Jump to content
SAU Community

RB26DETT or 2JZ  

263 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

who really cares. this thread from back in 2008, and was dug up by some noob, so i don't think the OP is going to care anymore.

as for what is better, the engine in the supra is superior in quality to that of the GTR (and you will find that anyone with any decent mechanical knowledge will agree, even on this forum). also in stock form the supra isn't far behind the GTR in a drag race.

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 1 year later...

lol 2j may be a better enginem but be f#*ked if I would drive a fat ugly supra. Esp since 99% of them on the streets are N/A and have been fast and the furious over done, making it the ricers 2nd weapom of choice behind hondas

lol 2j may be a better enginem but be f#*ked if I would drive a fat ugly supra. Esp since 99% of them on the streets are N/A and have been fast and the furious over done, making it the ricers 2nd weapom of choice behind hondas

A supra looks more sleek than an r34 gtr =\. But i do agree with the non turbo point. But twin turbos are in a different league.

still the same looking car. Not like a GTR and GTT where the supr model has phat guards and a stance like a BOSS. Supra make have a sleek look but GTR screams.....get out of my f**king way or i will destroy you....tough

ahahaha, and the interior looks like it's from the 1970s. they have the potential to look good, but they often end up looking like arse. a bit like a 33 4 door, LOL

just kidding, the 33 4 door doesn't have the potential to look good

Must...not....necrothread.....ahh, stuff it.

Supras look homo.

Therefore RBs win by default (unless you can find a manual Chaser).

/thread

What about the Aristo?

2J + rear seats + a boot?

I'll stick with my 20B, more factory power and torque then both of the formentioned... :whistling:

Edited by Hank Scorpio

What about the Aristo?

2J + rear seats + a boot?

I'll stick with my 20B, more factory power and torque then both of the formentioned... :whistling:

I didn't think they came in Manuel?

So therefore a Supra TT would be on par with an R34 GTR?

This means the Supra TT is better value for money... $25,000 Vs $45,000

Is this right?

Interesting that a R34 Gtr can be acquired for $45k back in 08. It must have been quite a steal at that price... either that or they haven't gone down in value over the past couple of years, in regard to all the other flagship cars from Japan.

still the same looking car. Not like a GTR and GTT where the supr model has phat guards and a stance like a BOSS. Supra make have a sleek look but GTR screams.....get out of my f**king way or i will destroy you....tough

I do like the look of the R34 Gtr's in general, although they do tend to appear fairly lean and tall for an all-round performance orientated car. How Nissan managed to make them handle the way they do in relation to their form deserves some accreditation. Perhaps the same goes for the R35 and all prior models.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
    • 300kW is so boring in a Skyline, you'll get spanked by someone's mum's Golf with Alibaba pipes, and an email tune.
×
×
  • Create New...