Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fastest in what?

0-100 Km/h?

Quater mile?

Couldn't tell you who's the fastest but from memory WHEELS and SPEED Magazine did an artical on the R32 GTR and they ran 0-100Km/h in 5.3 secs and 13.7sec down the quater mile.

Car was stock.

But there have been websites say the R32 GTR can run 0-100Km/h in 4.9 sec and a quater mile in 12.8 secs.

Iam sure its posible but I will need some publication proof not some website made by GTR fans.

Would an N1, using... N1 turbos be classed as stock?

R32 N1 turbos or R34 N1 turbos?

R34 N1 turbos are pretty much the same as 2530's and Paul did 10.something on a pair of them.

Does that count?

Cheers

Gary

i think he means on the stock ceramic turbos...I have seen them doing mid 11's at 18psi...although a bit risky.. all you would need is a decent clutch, power fc, boost controller and maybe a bigger fuel pump/injectors/am AFM and decent rubber...redline clutch dump and hang on!

http://www.fullboost.com.au/feature_car.ph...yId=453&p=2

11.57 @ 117.89mph

Standard everything except exhaust (front pipes too), cam gears, air filters, clutch and some more boost.

Think you need to sign up though to view it.

ps xklaba that's some crazy mph with standard turbos. You sure they're standard?

Would an N1, using... N1 turbos be classed as stock?

Yeah sure, Nissan made R32's, R33's and R34's in N1 Race Versions.

Wheels Magazine tested the R34 GTR V-Spec II Nur and the did a quater mile of 12.1 secs

I would not bother boosting the stock R32 and R33 turbos due to it being ceramic.

Edited by (00)SKYLINE(00)
Best I've got from stock Ceramics was 11.6

If N1's are like 2530's then low 10's :D

11.36 would be the fastest ive heard of...i think i ran around 11.6 in a mates car at WSID with stockers. Quite embarrising for him as his best was 12.1 :)

Edited by DiRTgarage
11.36 would be the fastest ive heard of...i think i ran around 11.6 in a mates car at WSID with stockers. Quite embarrising for him as his best was 12.1 :D

I think dipping into 11's on stock ceramics is pushing it though. Wasn't long after this one spat on of the wheels :)

I guess in 2WD on slicks with a stripped car etc etc you could do low 11's maybe even 10s.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...