Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The oldschool method for doing an oil flush, is dumping the old oil and refilling with a combination of diesel fuel and ATF. The diesel cleans it out, and the ATF lubricates. I wouldn't recommend doing this at all though.

Did some googling re using ATF, mixed results.

Can cause seals to fail due to moving away the sludge/carbon that is keeping them sealed, but it is a great cleaner.

Overall, good engine cleaner, but not that great for the engine as some can be bad for seal's/orings.

Maybe just using some cheaper oil for a flush may be a better option?

Do people run 10w-40 in their RB26's? Sometimes that particular weight in oil is on sale, or even 10w-30?

Or should I be using strictly 5w-40 even for flush's?

getting a UOA done soon on my Castrol Edge 10w60 to see what information it provides!

Mainlube do an engine oil flush for those who are interested. Probably pricey though.

Squareznboxez: do you have any proof about your claims of what is and isn't a proper Group 4 oil?

BTW Liqui-Moly were asked why their 10w40 is only an SL not an SN certified oil on another forum recently, and have not as yet answered. One would hope its because it contains additional ZDDP or something along those lines!

I don't understand why you guys are running such thick oils, are your engines built loose like a Cranbourne slapper?

A good read if you have the time...

http://www.briskoda.net/forums/topic/90661-16-important-oil-questions-answered/

Understand an oil that thick will have issues draining back to the sump, even at track temps. No way I would be revving it high either with thick oil, probably half the reason rb oil pumps fail regularly. At 80 degrees oil temp you probably only need a 0w20 for a high rpm modern engine...

racepace and status both recomend edge 10-60 for ethanol..only reason I went with it..5-40 for your average daily should be more than sufficient

lol @ cranbourne slapper...

I use everyday repco oil flush if Im changing oils...its about 12$ and definately thins your oil for good drainage..only do it if i'm changing to a different oil though.put it in run it warm and drain...liquimoly stuff is over 20$ a bottle...more than i want to flush down the ...errm.....drain

I only use a flush if I have cracked the engine, replacing heads or turbo's when im not sure everything is clean, or has had coolant through it. I always make sure to run a cheaper oil through afterwards and dump it within a few days. Perhaps i'm overly cautious?

Is there really need to run a engine flush after working on it? Most oil flush's just thin the shit out of your oil so you can get more out of your sump when you drain it. I'm definitely no expert, but i think its just a bit of a gimmick. If you change your oil regularly you should have no use for a engine oil flush product.

Most oils have detergents in them anyway to keep things clean.

The more I read about oil's, the more I get confused.

Edited by Booki

i like oil flushes,...are they necessary??..who knows but the way i see it it cant hurt...

That said i only use them when either changing to different oil or on my diesel ute on occasion. as iot was recomended by a mechanic as diesel oil tends to clog up.

when you use them I definately notice the oil drain quicker..

in my opinion, for the most part oil flushes are ok - however there has been cases where they have caused engine damage via the dislodging of carbon on the pistons and seals causing leaks/smoke and the kind - i believe there is no real need for engine flushes - it can be detrimental on older cars like ours

if you are wanting to get the oil thin before a drain - take it for a short drive, bring up the oil to temperature - then with gloves carefully unbolt the sump plug and it will drain much easier hot. this is the most efficient way to drain oil

also alot of talk with using higher weight oils such as 10w-50/60/70 - if your motor is built and your tuner recommends it - fine carry on - however for the rest of us with standard motors/bolt ons - bear in mind that the larger the gap in hot and cold numbers, the more viscosity modifiers need to be used - this makes the oil less sheer stable (more prone to higher temps and less stable strength wise)

i like oil flushes,...are they necessary??..who knows but the way i see it it cant hurt...

That said i only use them when either changing to different oil or on my diesel ute on occasion. as iot was recomended by a mechanic as diesel oil tends to clog up.

when you use them I definately notice the oil drain quicker..

Anyone used penrite premium ten 10w70 in there rb25det?

Lol, you obviously didn't click on the link.

Why don't you try some gear oil? Thicker oil won't save your engine, more likely it will cause damage, and certainly isn't recommended by Nissan.

Lol, you obviously didn't click on the link.

Why don't you try some gear oil? Thicker oil won't save your engine, more likely it will cause damage, and certainly isn't recommended by Nissan.

Oh great. The autobarn dude insisted on it for rb25det, Last time I listen to there shit.

Should I get rid of it and re-do or will it be ok

if you are wanting to get the oil thin before a drain - take it for a short drive, bring up the oil to temperature - then with gloves carefully unbolt the sump plug and it will drain much easier hot. this is the most efficient way to drain oil

Not really, sure the oils warmer but it's just been pumped around the engine, so there will still be oil draining from everywhere. If you drain it cold then all the oil that is ever going to drain is already sitting in the sump ready to drop. You gain nothing by doing it straight after a drive and probably end up draining less oil, not to mention the added worry of burning yourself.

Oh great. The autobarn dude insisted on it for rb25det, Last time I listen to there shit.

Should I get rid of it and re-do or will it be ok

Take it back and get a refund, if they crack the shits tell them they recommended you the wrong oil and demand your money back or an exchange. Something around 5w/40 is good as said.

Number 1 rule of owning a modified car is never listen to the opinion of anyone at an auto parts store, especially when it comes to oil and spark plugs!

very few manufacturers are using 100% group IV PAO based oils nowadays

was reading internal report leaked about all Mobil1 oils being a mix of group III and group IV - with your likes of Nulon, Penrite, Castrol, Shell priced the same way and employing the same sort of marketing - i would definately put money that none of these brands employ pure Group IV base stocks

report from Mobil's internal source;

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1990677 - if anyone wants to nerd out on 20pgs of why Mobil1 has switched from group IV to a group III/IV blend

A natural evolution of the formulation

The Mobil 1 formulation strategy has always been based on selecting the best components available. We now have the very high quality Group III+ base stock, ‘Visom’ exclusively available to ExxonMobil. As we developed the Mobil 1 ESP technology we found that combining Visom with PAO could deliver a formulation of equivalent performance to an all PAO formulation.

Competitive advantage

Visom is the only non-PAO stock that can deliver the required performance to formulate a 0W grade oil that meets European OEM engine oil specifications. Visom is not available to our competition.

To support Mobil 1 growth

Global PAO capacity is limited. As we quickly approach this limit, new base stocks must be explored to ensure we can support the continued growth of the Mobil 1 family of products.

To ensure continuity of supply

As we saw with the 2005 hurricane, the more flexibility we have in our formulations, the better placed we are to withstand disruption to our supply. We can balance PAO and Visom supply fluctuations to ensure we can always deliver the final product to our customers.

To maintain market relevant pricing

As PAO supply has tightened globally, raw material costs have increased substantially. In the future, an exclusively PAO formulation may be priced out of the market or result in significant margin erosion.

To prepare for next generation basestocks (GTL)

Commencing 2010, the next generation of base stocks derived from Natural Gas (Gas To Liquids) will enter the market. These high quality basestocks will arrive in substantial quantities and will probably be used in the majority of competitive premium formulations. Visom is viewed as a precursor of GTL, and hence it’s use now in our flagship formulations eases our transition to a GTL world, and helps us understand how to maintain flagship performance using these high quality non-PAO basestocks.

to my knowledge the only group IV manufacturers are;

- Motul 8100 - Group IV / V blend

- Redline - Group IV / V blend

- Royal Purple - Group IV only

- Amsoil Signature Series - Group IV / V blend ( i think happy to be corrected by i'm pretty sure this is not 100% double-ester based oil

- Mobil Delvac 1 - AFAIK this is still a Group IV PAO based oil

all of these oils are close to $100 / 5L with the exception of Motul 8100 X-Cess and X-Max which are around $70-80

anyone who would rate GW Syn-X 6000 the same as the above oils which has been confirmed by GW themselves to be a Group III/IV blend is simply misinformed - is it a great oil for most applications? absolutely - but they are chalk and cheese in terms of the base materials, money and R&D put into the group IV and V oils

Squareznboxez: do you have any proof about your claims of what is and isn't a proper Group 4 oil?

Edited by squareznboxez

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...