Jump to content
SAU Community

33 Gtst Vs 34 Gt-t

nortj06
 Share

Recommended Posts

nortj06 Rookie

nortj06

Posted
Posted

Been looking at both of these cars a bit an leaning towords the 33gtst series2. Most of the gt-t's i see are tiptronic but is it really any good. how would both the cars compare stock and how would a manual gt-t compare to the manual gts-t. just interested.

cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GTR-N1 Grand Master

GTR-N1

Posted
Posted

GDay Jackson,

Someone after me will surely supply you with some engine specs comparing the R33 GTsT with the R34 GTT,

but I'd certainly pick the R34 GTT for a couple of reasons (even though I like the R33 shape better - purely from a subjective angle)

i) being a later model car, you have more chance of getting one with less Kms and less wear

ii) street cred says that an R34 GTT (manual) has won the past two NZ Targas with its 4.1 diff (against GTRs, Porsches, STis, EVOs etc)

The plus for the R33 is that they're going pretty cheap and there's lots to pick from. Just pick carefully and try >3 on the day eh?

Cheers, T

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nizmo_freek Experienced

nizmo_freek

Posted
Posted
GDay Jackson,

Someone after me will surely supply you with some engine specs comparing the R33 GTsT with the R34 GTT,

but I'd certainly pick the R34 GTT for a couple of reasons (even though I like the R33 shape better - purely from a subjective angle)

i) being a later model car, you have more chance of getting one with less Kms and less wear

ii) street cred says that an R34 GTT (manual) has won the past two NZ Targas with its 4.1 diff (against GTRs, Porsches, STis, EVOs etc)

The plus for the R33 is that they're going pretty cheap and there's lots to pick from. Just pick carefully and try >3 on the day eh?

Cheers, T

What the hell are you talking about? :)

If you are talking about Joe McAndrew then his car is not a gtt, its a gtr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GTR-N1 Grand Master

GTR-N1

Posted
Posted
What the hell are you talking about? :)

If you are talking about Joe McAndrew then his car is not a gtt, its a gtr!

Looks like a Black GTT to me! Just watched it again!

Never mind, let's get this thread back on the road and help our friend out eh?

Cheers, T

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nizmo_freek Experienced

nizmo_freek

Posted
Posted
Looks like a Black GTT to me! Just watched it again!

Never mind, let's get this thread back on the road and help our friend out eh?

Cheers, T

Thats because it has a gtt front bumper :)

And yes, back on topic.

It is probly best that you go and test a r33 and a r34 for yourself to make a decision, each have their good and bad points such as

r33 is lighter and less powerfull

r34 is heavier but has more power

r34 is newer so should be in better condition

etc etc

And when it comes down to modifying both are pretty similar, espcially when it comes to engine modifications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GTS4WD Grand Master

GTS4WD

Posted
Posted
r33 is lighter and less powerfull

r34 is heavier but has more power

r34 is newer so should be in better condition

etc etc

True..

In terms of engine.. a GTT is in every way superior - More PSi from stock, ceramic turbo etc.

R33 GTST pushes 184 kW, 294 Nm

R43 GTT pushes 206 kW, 343 Nm

I am really not a fan of either cars..

But after driving both.. GTT hands down..

Save a little more for a manual GTT..

R33's these days are usually thrashed to the shithouse.. which means more km.. which means you need to replace things earlier.

34's have a higher cabin quality with more comfort..

I think the question you should be asking.. is;

33GTR vs. 34GTT.

Even then.. you could buy a 34 GTS4 and would be almost the same a 33GTR for a cheaper price..

Thats my 2cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morgs Veteran

Morgs

Posted
Posted

The R34 is definately a better option, its just a bit more money.

I upgraded the girls 33 to a 34, and everything is nicer.. just a better / nicer car all around. Being newer will do that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yo-Yo Grand Master

Yo-Yo

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've got an r34 gt-t which I bought after trading in my r33.

Noticable seating position difference, lower and sportier feel in the r34. Less rear legroom in the r34 being shorter overall, but difference is marginal.

Noticable increase in chassis rigidity in an r34, steering feels a lot lighter, turn in is sharper and much more stable powering out of corners, this makes it feel lighter and more nimble than an r33 but is a heavier car

coming from an r33 they're definitely a worthwhile upgrade, which you will notice when you drive and look at both.

No battery in the boot made it easier for me to install split speakers into the rear parcel shelf (battery put back in the engine bay for the r34 models)

no ugly external radio aerial on the 34

R33 GTR, probably more chance previous owner would've thrashed it (as opposed to a gtst)

insurance premium jumps moreso I've found (I looked into getting an r33 GTR before I chose the r34)

I'd imagine running costs would be a bit more expensive in the sense of insurance, replacement parts and repairs shuld anything go bang

all the best with your car hunting :P

Edited by Yo-Yo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jenkk Collaborator

Jenkk

Posted
Posted

hey man,

my 99 R34 GT-T manual is on its way from Japan atm

i got it for 17000 complied and landed here in adelaide.

5 spd manny with 50,000 on clock grade 4.5 outta 5 in auction.

lowered, exhaust, tint

no scratches or dents, perfect body.

DVD system with sat nav

white 2 dr.

I have a mate that has the same one so i tested it before i bought mine, and eveything about them is amazing. im very happy with it so i recomend the R34 GT-T by all means, r33 are nice, but i prefer a 34 by FAR! nicer looking cars in my opinion

But good luck with everyhting mate! im sure you'll find what your looking for.

Cheers, J

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Granthem Mentor

Granthem

Posted
Posted

34... both are awesome but i think interior wise the 34 is much nicer. Triple gauge cluster, Tri spoke wheel, nice seats. Interior wise its a world above, and thats where you will be spending your time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dick Wadd Newbie

Dick Wadd

Posted
Posted

34 has a stiffer chassis too, even stiffer than an r33 gtr i think (happy for someone with more knowledge to either confirm or dispute this though, as I can't remember where i read it).

Plus, in my view more important than the differrence in KW is the better low-end torque of the NEO engine, 343nm@3200rpm vs. 295NM@4800RPM for the 33. This, and the better quality interior, is why most people say its a more refined ride than a 33.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gts-4 dreamer Mentor

gts-4 dreamer

Posted
Posted

if you want an R... like we all did.. buy it... you will ultimately wish you had.

33's are a cheap way into a well balanced car. Will take money to get the performance you will want.

chassis rigidity, 34 gtt's are 'better'... 33's feel sloppy as a wet fish without tensioning... SERIOUSLY.... being better isnt exceptionally hard...

33 vs 34 engines total output is not hte story... stock for stock a 34 will JUST beat a 33. the 34 will be more fuel efficient throughout the rev range making more average power throughout that same range.

p.s. they are all second hand cars...

as clarkson said and is quite accurate actually.... they have all been wound back somewhere around dubai..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R33GOD Grand Master

R33GOD

Posted
Posted

I think the question you should be asking.. is;

33GTR vs. 34GTT.

Explain how this is possible?

I dont think a r34 gtt would come close. Ive driven a r34 gtt and my current 33 gtr.

The R is far more superior.

The gtt just looks "fresher"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
krzysiu Grand Master

krzysiu

Posted
Posted

Ide take an R33 GTR over an r34 gtt anyday!

Thing is if you want a gtr, you wont be satisfied untill you have one...

Which is why i might be selling my series 2 r33 gts-t and upgrading to a 1996 R33 GTR V-SPEC series 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      rb20de neo +t conversion - boost pressure sensor needed?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • GTSBoy
      R32 GTR fuel gauge not working despite fixing fuel level sender

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • TurboTapin
      Can anyone shed some insight on this Turbo?

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • joshuaho96
      how do i install this 3 port mac valve for boost control?

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
    • Duncan
      how do i install this 3 port mac valve for boost control?

      By Duncan · Posted

      Thanks for updating the outcome; while anywhere in the system could leak, I hadn't heard of a wastegate actuator doing so before, can add that to the list of potentials for next time
×
×
  • Create New...