Jump to content
SAU Community

Which Stroker Kit  

177 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

if i was building a forklift id put an RB30 engine in it as thats what they were designed for.

If i was building a high rpm drag engine id stick with a stock crank and high quality pistons and rods (my preference is JUN and this is the set-up i currently have to chase 8's with)

Interesting, my forkift RB30 motor runs 8.7 in a street car on street tyres and revs HIGHER than one of your local RB26 GTRs that has just ran 7.8s, go figure??

As far as a 26 being able to rev faster than a RB30 thats not true either unless your talking about in Neutral, in the real world the engine can only gain revs as quickly as the car is accellerating (unless you have wheelspin or clutch slip) so a RB30 making 700hp would actually rev faster than a 700hp RB26 due to the broader spread of torque.

Rob

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey Rob,

how long would that engine last for doing 1/4 mile pass's of 8.7 sec? Is the car drivable on the street? ie the cams aren't so lumpy that you need a skippers chair to sit right.

What kinda boost are you running through this " street car" to achieve that 162mph?

What do you define as a street car and in particular what are the specs of that one that does 8.7 secs? kerb weight?

cheers

rob

Stock internal REBUILT RB30 with alot of time spent, modifications, new parts, all assembled ready to go.

What a load of rubbish, if you can supply me fully forged shortblocks built to the same standard as I do for nzd3500 I'll have 20 a month please. Whats your account number I'd like to get started on these please.

Have you run 8.7 @162mph in a street car on street tyres with one of your forged bottom ends?

I'd bet you probably havn't done an 11.

Your not comparing apples with apples, not even close.

Rob

Rob dont bother with the doubters, i saw the same thing happen to you on the UK site and its best just to remain silent and keep showing your amazing workmanship.

Keep making those movies of dyno runs and drags and they will do the talking. Show the wheelstands and mention the customers who ship their cars across countries for your tuning.

Post some of your fabrication skills pics on here and leave it at that.

I have an r34 gtr and when i ready for a built motor, i will be buying from you!

I pm'ed with Rob from RIPS last year about an RB30 T04Z combo. It worked out almost the same price as a full house Step 2 HKS (all the extras) but the there was a shed load more fab involved, more hp on tap + a T04Z and piping in the RIPS deal . The guys on GTRUK seem very happy with Robs work.

Hey Rob,

how long would that engine last for doing 1/4 mile pass's of 8.7 sec? Is the car drivable on the street? ie the cams aren't so lumpy that you need a skippers chair to sit right.

What kinda boost are you running through this " street car" to achieve that 162mph?

What do you define as a street car and in particular what are the specs of that one that does 8.7 secs? kerb weight?

cheers

rob

The engine has done a full season, hours and hours on the dyno, a fair bit on the street and I pulled the pants off it recently to check it and I'm not even going to change the bearings, they are like new.

We run 2 bar and 9000rpm at the strip to get 162mph.

The car has full interior, full exhaust system with muffler, full steel body, all glass, dot street tyres etc.

It idles nice at 1000rpm, its smooth as silk to drive, doesn't get hot and is pretty good on gas on the open road (as long as you don't nail it, lol)

A 1200hp engine we just fitted to a R34 GTR was also very nice on the street, would pull nice from 1200rpm, make plenty of boost by 3500rpm and be hauling by 4500 to 9000rpm.

It made 620whp at all 4 with 1 bar of boost and 98 pump gas.

It made about 750whp at all 4 on 98 pump gas at 1.7 bar with a very safe tune and 1000whp on C16 at 2 bar.

It weighed 1740kg and on its first ever run at the strip (which I made a bit of a mess of) it ran a 9.7.

Rob

its also a lot lower than some 11000-12000rpm rb26's going around

True, the RB30s we usually do have stock blocks, stock cranks, stock cradles etc so 9000 is plenty I think, lol.

Besides that, by 8500rpm we are usually making more power than a similar spec 26 doing 9500-10,000 and I'd rather keep the rpm as low as required to get the job done.

Rob

its also a lot lower than some 11000-12000rpm rb26's going around

still seems very impressive

Still seems? I dunno quite what you're getting at, but I don't ever recall the highest revs you can reach is a tangible indication of good performance. The whole 8.7 @ 162mph in a street car is however. If revs were the most important thing then we could just put little 2stroke motors in our cars :blink: High revs is one of the best ways of killing an engine fast...

With your RB30 stock bottom ends from NZD$4000, are these all ready to be bolted straight onto a twin cam head?

Yep, the mods are done to the oil system and the belt tensioner is relocated.

A twin cam head will bolt straight on but the R33 RB25 head needs the usual mods first.

Rob

the luckiest thing for Rips would be there road rules are a shitload less strict than ours.. the car that does 8.2's is great however it wouldnt be a road car here in aus seeing as it drives around with a chute 4link and wheelie bars from memory?

Yeah aussie road rules are pretty bad in some places I've heard.

When on the street we usually take off the wheelie bars and parachute but although I've been pulled over many times by the cops they only want a look at the car usually, I've never had a warning or a ticket.

Rob

^^ variable timing with the RB25 is actually quite tasty :(

I always thought that you lose the VCT when doing a RB30 bottem end because of the oil galleries or something :D

Edited by PM-R33
you can modify the head + an external oil feed from the block to retain it.

A little sideways off topic, but... I came across pictures of an RB25 VCT cam conversion that was being done to an RB26 head the other day. Where there's a will there's a way.... A little clever thinking and access to a machine shop will get you VCT on a RB26 a lot cheaper than the HKS variable cam system.

the luckiest thing for Rips would be there road rules are a shitload less strict than ours.. the car that does 8.2's is great however it wouldnt be a road car here in aus seeing as it drives around with a chute 4link and wheelie bars from memory?

Yeah thats a fair point.

Soon as anything shiny is seen in the engine bay its off through the ringer, so depending on what you want, use etc you are restricted in some ways depending on where you live.

I remember being in Wellington a couple years back and a VN with a massive blower sticking out the bonnet came driving past.

And friends i was with said ye, that doesn't really get much attention over here.

I nearly fainted :D

Yeah thats a fair point.

Soon as anything shiny is seen in the engine bay its off through the ringer, so depending on what you want, use etc you are restricted in some ways depending on where you live.

I remember being in Wellington a couple years back and a VN with a massive blower sticking out the bonnet came driving past.

And friends i was with said ye, that doesn't really get much attention over here.

I nearly fainted :)

yeh when a mate of mine from NZ was telling me wat you could get away with over there in the ways of mods i couldnt believe it..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...