Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R32s (both GTR, GTS-T and GTS4), 300zx, more S13 silvias, 180sx first came out with the CA18DET... few popular cars actually appeared that year.

Come 2005, if the rule remains the same that is, 1990 models will be even more popular. While a lot of the cars above came out in 89, they didn't really hit full production en'mass until about 1990.

Much larger range of 1990 vehicles to choose from (of all types) it seems from the various auction lists I have looked at.

Hey Guys.

Ok i know first hand whats happening with the 15yr rules. I have been on the phone for almost an hour, trying to work out how they intend on implementing this rule.

Now it is NOT a change in the rule just a change in the way its interpreted. It has always been a 15yr rule, not a 14yr and 11 months rule.

Now basically they want the importer to prove what year(easy) and now the month also(hard)

Now they have said either dereg papers from japan, Proof from the manufacturer or a date and corresponding VIN list.

Now i don't know anyone who can supply me with the list of numbers i need.

But basically its to stop the potential flood of 89 models in jan 2004.

Being an importer sure is fun atm, with raws now this what mroe can they throw at us????

Glenn

somertoncarimporters.com

Finding the VIN numbers will be the key to 15 year imports a friend who is a buyier in Japan for some of the big players has nearly finished his collection of VIN numbers on all cars upto 20 years old that come into this country.

I have been sent a link to a car in free storage over in Japan and the only thing in short supply is bricks.

I would ask for info on my car if I had one sitting in Japan.

http://www.adultmovies.bz/~mandy/Celsior/C...Celsior%202.jpg

Celsior.jpg

I just cant believe that people are whinging about this. If you had've asked any importer - and I'm not talking about someone who is only interested in extracting a service fee from you - about whether the 1989 stuff would be allowed in and you would have been told that there was no way in hell the government would let them come in. I havent bought a single '89 car to store because I knew it would happen.

Its the old adage - if something appears too good to be true then it is - 16k GT-Rs fall into that bracket...

Jash

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...