Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

-7s being a tad more responsive again (over -9) would be an excellent choice if response is your #1 goal.

FYI, here's stock vs -7 boost response (very few data points.....its rough) same engine and probably same cam timing.

med_gallery_15274_3730_6060.png

FYI, here's stock vs -7 boost response (very few data points.....its rough) same engine and probably same cam timing.

med_gallery_15274_3730_6060.png

I thought N1 turbos were different to -7 turbos?? The legend on your graph says N1 whereas your text says -7. I thought -7 were a lot more responsive then N1.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey guys, great thread, some useful information in it.

i am slowly working on my car to achieve just this set up 300awkw

at the moment, i have just installed

GT2860-7 x 2 turbos

Tomei expreme dump pipes

already has a front pipe, and a hks preist cat back with a high flow 3" Catco cat. (looking at changing exhuast to one with a bit louder/better flow) any suggestions?? rear cannon style.

i have a vipec ecu (which i need to get retuned but going to wait till after mods) MAFless

it has pump incar already, so that is a non issue.

suspension is all done.

i am at the stage of buying injectors, i have been looking at seimens injectors, can anybody give me some info on which type to run if they know about seimens injectors? part numbers etc, im looking at about the 600cc mark for injectors

Also never really though about cam gears, but might also look into those b4 retune.

Cheers

Daz

ive got very similar mods to urs Daz.

im running 600cc nismo injectors with a sard intake fuel pump with a direct 14v power supply.

im also running GReddy cam gears, i think they are great on an RB26. they gave me more flexability when it came time for tuning. ie i had a choice between getting them tuned for outright power or sacrifice abit of top end for more midrange power/torque :)

ive got very similar mods to urs Daz.

im running 600cc nismo injectors with a sard intake fuel pump with a direct 14v power supply.

im also running GReddy cam gears, i think they are great on an RB26. they gave me more flexability when it came time for tuning. ie i had a choice between getting them tuned for outright power or sacrifice abit of top end for more midrange power/torque :)

Whats your max injector duty? What power is it making and what boost is that at?

+1 on cam gears

Not sure on injector duty, il have to find that out

296kw @ 19psi - cam gears adjusted for midrange, feels so responsive And just screams out of corners like a mofo :) I'm happy with it 100%

Duty couldn't be too high with 600s, im running 700s and only seeing max of 65% @ 350-360rwkw. Has a minor rail pressure bump so move it to 70-75%

600cc @ 300rwkw, rough stab would be 55-65%?

Had a good read of this thread before I started my round of mods for 300kw. My mods so far are

2860-9

Nismo 600cc

New PFC

HKS cam gears

Greddy dump/front pipe extension

Kakimoto Regu exhaust

Splitfire coil packs

Hasn't been tuned yet because of coilpack and EBC issues. But I'm hopeful I'll get close to cracking the 300 mark but at this stage I just want it tuned and running

Time and time again I see ppl try to estimate duty cycle in relation to power output but it seems like we are leaving out the most inportant fator which is afr.

A car with 600cc making 300rwkw tuned at 11.0afr will show higher duty cycle than if it was tuned to 12.0afr and making the same 300rwkw.

Can any one explain why my boost curve is fluctuating, at a glance i'd guess some sort of fuzzy logic function however im pretty sure the blitz spec r are theoretically just an open loop controller with simple duty cycle adjustment. The car is running the standard 8psi actuators on dash 7s and the blitz boost controller set to 86. When i eventually fit bigger dumps (i have stock 32), bigger afm and retune on e85, i'd like to run more boost. Is it worth while upgrading to 14psi actuators?

Cheers

Pat

l.jpg

Time and time again I see ppl try to estimate duty cycle in relation to power output but it seems like we are leaving out the most inportant fator which is afr.

A car with 600cc making 300rwkw tuned at 11.0afr will show higher duty cycle than if it was tuned to 12.0afr and making the same 300rwkw.

No different to estimating a dyno figure range or RPM turbos will come on.

There are always variables, however you can work out 'roughly' in most cases, hence its called an estimate...

Currently running -9s with 335kw, nismo 600cc injectors and fuel pump, with a max injector duty cycle of 86%

Just for reference

What air flow meters are using to get up to that figure? Are the standard still coping or have they been changed to Nismo or Z32?

My car is getting tuned in just under two weeks with -9s and 720cc injectors so i'm thinking the AFM's are going to be the next limiting factor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...