Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently running -9s with 335kw, nismo 600cc injectors and fuel pump, with a max injector duty cycle of 86%

Just for reference

Dyno graph please!

What air flow meters are using to get up to that figure? Are the standard still coping or have they been changed to Nismo or Z32?

My car is getting tuned in just under two weeks with -9s and 720cc injectors so i'm thinking the AFM's are going to be the next limiting factor.

I'm using Z32s works well recommend upgrading or like stated earlier mafless ECU

Just last weekend i make 311kw on my 32gtr. -7 turbos, tomei cams, supposed head porting, turbo back exhaust, 750cc injectors, fuel pump, pfc. I bought brand new z32 afm's, messed around getting them all fitted up nicely; when it came to getting tuned the tuner basically said we were reaching only maybe 20% of the z32's efficiency and had bigger jumps in voltage vs trim than the original so much harder to get a steady afr. Ended up swapping back to the original afm's and instantly became better to tune (smaller voltage steps meant more refinablilty) and still have 0.5v to spare. Spools up quickly and pulls harder that a professional thaiwanese girl :thumbsup:

Edited by joeyta22

For everyones information, I have compiled this spreadsheet of all the results from the RB26 dyno thread here:

SAU_dyno_comparisons.xls

This only includes results that aren't from standard turbos, but heaps of results from -7's/N1's, -9's/GT-SS, and -5's/2530.

I have also added this to the dyno thread.

And yes I did get really bored to find the time to come up with this one lol.

Just last weekend i make 311kw on my 32gtr. -7 turbos, tomei cams, supposed head porting, turbo back exhaust, 750cc injectors, fuel pump, pfc. I bought brand new z32 afm's, messed around getting them all fitted up nicely; when it came to getting tuned the tuner basically said we were reaching only maybe 20% of the z32's efficiency and had bigger jumps in voltage vs trim than the original so much harder to get a steady afr. Ended up swapping back to the original afm's and instantly became better to tune (smaller voltage steps meant more refinablilty) and still have 0.5v to spare. Spools up quickly and pulls harder that a professional thaiwanese girl :thumbsup:

Hey mare do you have dyno graphs with rpm etc? If not when do you hit full boost and what boost are you running? Cheers

Just got my dyno result back from racepace. Got 316kw running 17-18psi with n1's, fuel pump, ID 1000c injectors (53% duty), nismo afm's, pfc, racepace 3.5" full custom exhaust and cam gears. This is a really safe tune. Can post up dyno sheet if you want.

Car is mega responsive and still kicks out with 285's all around 1st and 2nd gear.

Hey mare do you have dyno graphs with rpm etc? If not when do you hit full boost and what boost are you running? Cheers

Is running at 17psi max and hits that at 4500rpm, could be much better but the actuators are piss weak (only about 8psi) which is why the power becomes a little wavey around the top of the graph aswell. Overall im stoked with it tho, 200kw at 4000rpm is a great result in my eyes.

296330_10150326044066843_606966842_8560634_1321811639_n.jpg

joeyta22, nice results mate. im still deciding whether to go -7s or -9s as an upgrade.

how much better are the -9s in terms of response compared to -7s?

is there any -9s dyno sheet with RPM instead of speed.

is there anyone in sydney with -7s or -9s on an unstroked motor who are willing to take me for a test drive? worth a shot asking anyway lol

Just to throw a spanner in the works for low mounts, here is a direct comparison between a -7 set up and a GT3582R on 6boost manifold :)

I dislike 35R's because they are so lazy but even a lazy single appears to kill the low mounts everywhere :nyaanyaa:

haha i got the exact same setup tuned on my car 2 days before you posted this..

Unopened rb26dett (115,000km)

tomei 260 9.15mm poncams type b

gt35 0.82 rear

6boost mani

tial 44mm w/g

700cc sards

stock rail

044 intake

tuned on BP98

485hp @ 20psi on a safe tune (at hubs)

full boost at 4300rpm, love it! shits all over my old twin setup in every way

thick line is gt35 + poncam tune, thin line is -7 tune

7TYI8l.jpg

Apologies for the poor phone pic of my dyno graph!

Not really a spanner. It's already been established, the -7 setup was 100rwkw down @ 4500rpm compared to every other -7 set-up. That ain't no dyno variance :)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/379561-gtr-r33-v-spec-build/

So whilst a direct 'comparison', it's totally wrong to compare a working set-up with one that has major issues.

Very misleading info, although it wasn't intended that way of course.

Not really a spanner. It's already been established, the -7 setup was 100rwkw down @ 4500rpm compared to every other -7 set-up. That ain't no dyno variance :)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/379561-gtr-r33-v-spec-build/

So whilst a direct 'comparison', it's totally wrong to compare a working set-up with one that has major issues.

Very misleading info, although it wasn't intended that way of course.

It's not misleading at all, if you look at ANY result on the ALLSTAR dyno they are always down on midrange compared to most other dynos...

For instance my car only makes 127rwkw at 4000rpm on the Allstar dyno but 196rwkw at the same rpm on a Dyno Dynamics dyno. That was on the same tank of fuel with about 50km driving between the 2 dynos!

Another RB25 neo makes 135rwkw at 4000rpm on the Allstar dyno but 220rwkw at the same rpm on a Dyno Dynamics dyno...

Then we could compare my set up to batterys, both same motor, same fuel, same turbo, same manifold, same gate... Same top end power on the same boost on the same type on dyno. Plus same boost response and build up on the road. His makes 200rwkw at 4000rpm (funnily enough almost exactly the same as mine on a dyno dynamics) and mine makes 127rwkw...

Take from it what you will, I have no idea why it is like that but every single result I see off the Allstar dyno appears to have shit mid range compared with other dynos which explains most of the "100rwkw down @ 4500rpm"

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...