Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

interesting... wats the idle like.. i assume you'd probaly have troubles getting it down to 1000-1100 range with injectors of that size? than again.. the cams in that thing would be rather large and probaly prefer an idle around the 1200rpm mark?

Back to this question trent.. how does it idle with such large injectors?

Edited by Jaffar
  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Back to this question trent.. how does it idle with such large injectors?

like a bridgeport rotary (brup, brup, brup, brup) ..... real nice rotational lump... best sounding RB idle i have ever heard.. about 1200rpm.

Edited by URAS
Someone's a gay, squealing gimp then! LOL!

HAHAHA that was the owner (200sx), a good mate.... not me. video removed for fear he may bash me :P

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=CWom840WOhM

Edited by URAS

nice! it really would be one hell of a ride from 5,000rpm to 6,000rpm it sure piles on a whole lot of power thereafter. good result mate. :cool:

PS, I drove past your house on saturday as I was down that way, I was going to call and drop in but missed you you non phone answering bad man!

RB20's aren't capable of that power.

Well, no-one's arguing any more!

A conservative tune of 277rwkw on 1.25 bar says otherwise knackers.....

Made more than Athid's white S15 on the same boost level........

BTW don't eat all that hat of yours at once :cool:

Edited by Wheezy

Christ! People just don't get sarcasm even when it's jumping up and down in front of them.

But now you've kicked it off, the car this thread is about 'should' run some serious numbers but neither the tuner nor the owner are on here claiming 9's!

Have a smile and a Coke and cheer the hell up!

:cool:

Christ! People just don't get sarcasm even when it's jumping up and down in front of them.

But now you've kicked it off, the car this thread is about 'should' run some serious numbers but neither the tuner nor the owner are on here claiming 9's!

Have a smile and a Coke and cheer the hell up!

:P

:cool:

All in good fun!!!

nice! it really would be one hell of a ride from 5,000rpm to 6,000rpm it sure piles on a whole lot of power thereafter. good result mate. :cool:

PS, I drove past your house on saturday as I was down that way, I was going to call and drop in but missed you you non phone answering bad man!

ahh bugger ive moved closer to the shop.....

Quite the opposite, champ. I see you have misread/misinterpreted what I meant. No matter.

My point was that it's silly to make assumptions and guesstimates without knowing or at least having a pretty bloody good idea at what the other variables are.

I don't exactly understand where you have gone with this. My comment was:

1000cc injectors should be capable of exactly 1200 engine hp. Considering he would only be making 1100-1150 engine hp...it's high but not impossible.

I said 'should be capable of'. I don't see how I have made an assumption or guesstimate? Someone was saying you can't make 1000whp using 1000cc injectors. I did a calculation and found that it could still be possible so pointed that out. No assumptions or guesstimates there mate.

If you really really want me to, I will calculate the exact amount. I will also list the common types of fuels including their burn rates and tell you exactly how many CC's each one needs to flow to make that much hp.

Or you can just accept the fact that all I was saying was 1000cc injectors could still do the job.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...