Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks guys ;)

Sure I can give you basics :P

It's an SR20VE+T now, big custom cams, sleeved / forged bottom end, modded Precision turbo on 6boost manifold, ported head, oversized valves etc, Bosch 2000cc injectors, custom plenum, Plazmaman throttle body.

sounds wicked. there is some cool stuff happening around the place with the SR VET heads going on to SR20s. but your thing is out of this world. I'd like to come check it out one day soon. :)

It's an SR20VE+T now, big custom cams, sleeved / forged bottom end, modded Precision turbo on 6boost manifold, ported head, oversized valves etc, Bosch 2000cc injectors, custom plenum, Plazmaman throttle body.

Thats awesome, its a PT6765 I'm guessing? The Precision and the FP-HTA billet turbos are wicked pieces of kit, good to see them catching on down this part of the world. I am hoping that soon I'll be able to report some results for a built RB25 running a PT6765 on E85... that should be quite interesting.

  • 2 weeks later...

cheers mate, allways keen to try new things!

Yes i used to get 380 to 450km's to a tank with BP98 depending how i drove it. I came up with a magical number in my head when making up the map in datalogit on my pc at home which was spot on, and its no way near double then what it was, but i will say it is more then 25% consumption.

My gtr uses bout 20 litres per 100 ks I did a trip from.Brisbane to.tweed on.the weekend and.went through a tank in 180 km mind u its a very very heavaly modified engine

cheers mate, allways keen to try new things!

Yes i used to get 380 to 450km's to a tank with BP98 depending how i drove it. I came up with a magical number in my head when making up the map in datalogit on my pc at home which was spot on, and its no way near double then what it was, but i will say it is more then 25% consumption.

My gtr uses bout 20 litres per 100 ks I did a trip from.Brisbane to.tweed on.the weekend and.went through a tank in 180 km mind u its a very very heavaly modified engine

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally joined the E85 club! RB25 Neo with super responsive turbo making 242rwkw on 98 and 279rwkw on E85! Very happy

Havent tried cold start yet but my idle is smoother than on 98! Thanks Trent from Status Tuning and Tao from Hypergear turbos!

post-29432-0-66365500-1313121774_thumb.jpg

post-29432-0-97175300-1313121793_thumb.jpg

Hi guys,

I just had my car run on a dyno on the weekend, it pulled 353rwkw @ 24.5psi

the AFR's were dead flat on 11:1

boost held strong to redline, only droping maybe 1.5-2psi from peak.

question is, is 11:1 AFR too rich for E85? i dont think there is much advance timing in the tune, maybe 3-5 degrees over PULP

turbo's -5's

exhaust 3in full system incl 3in decat

nismo AFM's

std airbox

K&N air filter

1000cc injectors

Nistune ECU

twin walbro in tank fuel pumps

ARC 70mm intercooler

silicone I/C piping

std cams (recond when engine rebuilt)

forged bottom end

Mines dump pipes

std manifolds

that's pretty much it

That is very low power for -5s on 98 fuel. I would fix whatever the issue is holding that back. Should be able to make around 350rwkw on 98 first. 318 is -7 or -9 power. Whatever restriction you have may be holding back your E85 results in a more significant way.

honestly in my experience it's in the ball park. having seen dozens of cars with -5s most often they make between 310 and 340kw at 20-22psi. 353kw on E85 is not bad. perhaps a little low but every car and every dyno is so different as long as it's performing it's not worth worrying about.

Hi guys,

I just had my car run on a dyno on the weekend, it pulled 353rwkw @ 24.5psi

the AFR's were dead flat on 11:1

boost held strong to redline, only droping maybe 1.5-2psi from peak.

question is, is 11:1 AFR too rich for E85? i dont think there is much advance timing in the tune, maybe 3-5 degrees over PULP

11:8 to 12 AFR is the sweet/safe spot. Leaning it out a bit will net you some gains.

Hi guys,

I just had my car run on a dyno on the weekend, it pulled 353rwkw @ 24.5psi

the AFR's were dead flat on 11:1

boost held strong to redline, only droping maybe 1.5-2psi from peak.

question is, is 11:1 AFR too rich for E85? i dont think there is much advance timing in the tune, maybe 3-5 degrees over PULP

11:8 to 12 AFR is the sweet/safe spot. Leaning it out a bit will net you some gains.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...