Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

i was comparing simons 625hp not my own setup nick.

cerbera thats something i expected from you on a forum, just your style lol

borg warners are where its at :P

come on its a matter of personal preference i think, everyone has there own ideas of lag/power/fast.

11m59gn.jpg

beii5j.jpg

pretty much the same engine/turbo but one has 6-boost twin scroll and one has china manifold and a dodgy gate

shows what a well set up manifold/gate/boost controller combo can do...

Would it be possible to overlay a stock curve for those following at home?

post-11223-1261636788_thumb.jpg

Ah ic ic - makes more sense now :P

Would be interesting to see the GT35 on a good setup i think, one thing that's missing from the comparo's haha ;)

Here is a graph of my GT35 with .82 rear on a decent manifold setup

also i plotted it on brockas graph to compare, its the black line.

post-11223-1261636788_thumb.jpg

diff ratios dont seem to be the same and isnt yours a RB30 therefore totally useless comparison?!?

lol ye exactly - twice in as many days... stand back george :)

Thanks sky30 - but kinda... not really relevant unfortunately :(

Didnt realise that its a RB26, for some reason i thought brockas was a RB30det, That would explain why it seems so laggy to me. Oh well interesting comparison between rb30 and rb26.

Its a r32 gtr diff, 4.11 ratio, what are the ratios in the other graphs?

Car should be running in a week or so. And i'll head to the plex again see if it can go decently into the tens on street tyres. To4z has the top end to get decently into the mid 130mph's. With the small things its had done to it this time round 650rwhp should be enough for mid tens on street tyres.

I'd love to see a GT4088R compared with these things :D

lol give my bank balance time to recover after this change in setup first!!

I've now taken 2 people for a spin in my car. They both saw the graphs before going for a drive, and said the exact same thing. "It doesn't feel as laggy as it looks on the dyno plot".

Would love to have it snapping on boost hard, but I don't think my gearbox would like that...

Just looking at Pauls Graph compared to mine as a t04z to to4z comparison seems to be quite a bit of difference in response. They are both roughly based on speed vs hp and at say at 130kms pauls is making 220hp ish and mine is making almost 400hp at the same speed. Just an interesting comparison as mine didn't really feel laggy at all and should be better with the new setup of bigger valves and bits and pieces. As a comparison mine was running 27psi and i think pauls is 25psi so pretty close.

ftzcck.jpg29kvupj.jpg

Edited by R32-GTS

I think you can put it down to the boost control.

You can see in your graph the boost comes on hard where as Brockas is a bit lazier. A good boost controller makes all the difference.

Car should be running in a week or so. And i'll head to the plex again see if it can go decently into the tens on street tyres. To4z has the top end to get decently into the mid 130mph's. With the small things its had done to it this time round 650rwhp should be enough for mid tens on street tyres.

LOL

no chance you will have it running in a week or so!!!

Indeed arguable. Effiecent range on the GT35 is probably 28 - 30psi and 35 + on t04z.

Brockas like most probably not keen to push to those levels.

All your graph comparo proves is that brockas china manifold / setup is crap compared to 6boost and your setup.

GT35 on your setup would have rocked.

LOL coming from the guy that never raced his 26 !!! Simon N has times you got wannabe ......

Final word

IN PERTH GT35 smashs the t04z on RB26. Best single t04z time is like 10.8 on a fully built motor ??

There is more then one GT35 RB26's quicker then that IN PERTH.

RockoGTR's 10.4 on Nexan Radials is a GT35 and China manifold. We are going to put it on E85 and MT Drag radials and try again.

I think you can put it down to the boost control.

You can see in your graph the boost comes on hard where as Brockas is a bit lazier. A good boost controller makes all the difference.

I now have one of the best boost controllers on the market, the Blitz Dual SBC Spec R.

Unfortunately, it's my wastegate which is letting me down.

Simon, we overlayed yours versus mine and yours destroys my setup everywhere. It's on earlier due to the head porting, but yours snaps on boost so much harder. I think once I sort this wastegate issue it will change the midrange dramatically and also carry a few more HP to the top.

For now though, I'm going to see how long this $300 2nd hand box lasts... the fact that it lasted the dyno run means it's been good value so far...

Natto it will be interesting for me to see if your car can repeat the 627. That is a 4 year old dyno graph your clinging on to. Dyno's get worn, software updates and re-calibrated over that time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...