Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for anyone thats interested, i just printed something off dtei that says as of the 1st of jan, 35% tint will be legal on windows except the windscreen (obviously).

very interested brew

might even motivate me to get my tinting redone later 2010... was not happy with the shit job tintacar did

-D

What % is currently legal?

In SA...0%, your not meant to have any on the front windows, but you can go as dark as you want behind the driver. Well that what i was told by the guy who did my window tinting.

The Road Traffic Rules 1999 set the standards required for window tinting on motor vehicles in SA.

Windscreens - must have a luminous transmittance of at least 75% for vehicles built after 1971 (70% for others) and cannot be coated in a way that reduces the luminous transmittance in any part of the area below - either the top of the windscreen wiper's sweep or the top 10% of the windscreen whichever is lesser.

Driver and front passengers windows - These windows must have a luminous transmittance of at least 70%

Windows behind the drivers seat - These must have a luminous transmittance of at least 35%.

All windows must not have a reflectance value of more than 10%.

SA Transport - Window Tinting Laws

That is so bloody awesome - I'd heard rumours of this coming in, but it's good to see it's a definite.

I can finally get my R34 fronts darker than factory (and maybe closer to matching the factory privacy glass rears).

Woot Woot Woot! *happy*

I can finally get my R34 fronts darker than factory (and maybe closer to matching the factory privacy glass rears).

Woot Woot Woot! *happy*

+1 :cheers::santa:

Just gave Auto Perfection a ring, R34's with no current tint on the front passenger windows, in 35%, costs around $110, not including SAUSA discount :) i know what ill be doing soon! They re-open on 4th Jan.

hey guys just went through the pits not long ago and talkad about tint to the guy. 75% front and 35% rear is legal in sa. 75%'s f**k all and not even worth bothering with. my s2 stageas come standard with 75% front and somethin stupid like 14% rear but cos its built in and factory item theres fark all they can do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...