Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for anyone thats interested, i just printed something off dtei that says as of the 1st of jan, 35% tint will be legal on windows except the windscreen (obviously).

very interested brew

might even motivate me to get my tinting redone later 2010... was not happy with the shit job tintacar did

-D

What % is currently legal?

In SA...0%, your not meant to have any on the front windows, but you can go as dark as you want behind the driver. Well that what i was told by the guy who did my window tinting.

The Road Traffic Rules 1999 set the standards required for window tinting on motor vehicles in SA.

Windscreens - must have a luminous transmittance of at least 75% for vehicles built after 1971 (70% for others) and cannot be coated in a way that reduces the luminous transmittance in any part of the area below - either the top of the windscreen wiper's sweep or the top 10% of the windscreen whichever is lesser.

Driver and front passengers windows - These windows must have a luminous transmittance of at least 70%

Windows behind the drivers seat - These must have a luminous transmittance of at least 35%.

All windows must not have a reflectance value of more than 10%.

SA Transport - Window Tinting Laws

That is so bloody awesome - I'd heard rumours of this coming in, but it's good to see it's a definite.

I can finally get my R34 fronts darker than factory (and maybe closer to matching the factory privacy glass rears).

Woot Woot Woot! *happy*

I can finally get my R34 fronts darker than factory (and maybe closer to matching the factory privacy glass rears).

Woot Woot Woot! *happy*

+1 :cheers::santa:

Just gave Auto Perfection a ring, R34's with no current tint on the front passenger windows, in 35%, costs around $110, not including SAUSA discount :) i know what ill be doing soon! They re-open on 4th Jan.

hey guys just went through the pits not long ago and talkad about tint to the guy. 75% front and 35% rear is legal in sa. 75%'s f**k all and not even worth bothering with. my s2 stageas come standard with 75% front and somethin stupid like 14% rear but cos its built in and factory item theres fark all they can do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...