Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I couldn't possibly imagine it would be under $10k to get a turbo kit and all the associated things engineered (fuel system, intake, exhaust system, emissions etc etc).

Regency DO give you the certificate to say that you are roadworthy, but how does a cop know just because you went to Regency last week, that the car is still in the identical shape it went through Regency? The VAST majority of owners get defected then stock their car out back to factory (often costing thousands), go through Regency and have the defect taken off, then within hours all of the previous mods/turbos/whatever are re-fitted to the car and they are on their way. Hell, there are a couple of mobs around town that have a drive in/drive out service where they will stock out your car for inspection, then refit all of the previous goodies - for a decent fee of course. You really need to go and read this thread from page one and hear all the defect/Regency stories. Very intentionally cops/Regency have made it an absolute nightmare to own a modified car. In a lot of ways they have won :(

And no, you definitely can't sue the police in that scenario - if they SUSPECT that your car is illegal they have the absolute right to send you to Regency. That is the law. I know people who have been to Regency more than 20 times in the same car. I also know of people who have had their engineering certificates laughed at by the cops as they wrote them their defect notice.

Most people don't care about having a car engineered or the legality of mods. They run the risk , and then when caught stock it out, pass Regency and re-fit all the goodies. Sadly in the case of our cars to de-turbo for inspection then re-turbo a car post-inspection is a MASSIVE cost and you would not run the risk.

Oh shit this is f**ked!! My build is too extreme to be able to restock it then rebuild it every time. I have way too many parts invested into this, would cost me shit loads!!

Not sure what to do now? I have already bought all the parts and I don't really want to drive around without a roadworthy certificate and then get busted.

But I got an e-mail back from DPTI who are saying I am able to do the turbo conversion provided it goes through the correct procedures and correct testing. And they also stated their is 2 emission testing facilities in SA, Bells Auto and Graham West Workshop.

They just said I have to submit the application for modification and they will give me the statement of requirements.

  • 2 months later...

There's some restrictions around the size - but the main one is, if the car came from the factory with an air-bag - any replacement wheel also has to have an airbag.

https://www.sa.gov.au/topics/driving-and-transport/vehicles/vehicle-standards-and-modifications/steering-modifications

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...