Jump to content
SAU Community

Rta Car Breaks The Rules!

Kujotk

By Kujotk,
in New South Wales

 Share

Recommended Posts

madbung Grand Master

madbung

Posted
Posted

Here are the road safety regulation requirements for licence plates...

Must not obscure the number plate in any way, ii. Must be clear, untinted and uncoloured, iii. Must have surfaces which are flat both on the side which faces the number plate and on the side which faces away from the vehicle, iv. Must have non-reflective characteristics and, v. Must have no unusual refractive characteristics. These requirements effectively prohibit number plate covers which have curved, domed, tinted or reflective surfaces from being fitted to a vehicle. Number plate covers which have lines or other markings on the surface which go over the number plate are also effectively prohibited. Regulation 222(2)(b) of the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1988 also requires that a number plate fitted to a vehicle must be clearly distinguishable and not be wholly or partially obscured.

Pretty sure they are uniform across all states.

Yo-Yo Grand Master

Yo-Yo

Posted
Posted

pfft I've got one of those license plate covers with the black lines across it.

Driven past plenty of patrol cars and even had a patrol car tail me out of curiosity, and haven't had any problems

one of many rules in place that aren't really enforced I guess, there's all these p platers around my street with sh$tbox cars and cannon mufflers and they seem to get away with them even though they can't do modifications

Kujotk Grand Master

Kujotk

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Here are the road safety regulation requirements for licence plates...

Must not obscure the number plate in any way, ii. Must be clear, untinted and uncoloured, iii. Must have surfaces which are flat both on the side which faces the number plate and on the side which faces away from the vehicle, iv. Must have non-reflective characteristics and, v. Must have no unusual refractive characteristics. These requirements effectively prohibit number plate covers which have curved, domed, tinted or reflective surfaces from being fitted to a vehicle. Number plate covers which have lines or other markings on the surface which go over the number plate are also effectively prohibited. Regulation 222(2)(b) of the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1988 also requires that a number plate fitted to a vehicle must be clearly distinguishable and not be wholly or partially obscured.

Pretty sure they are uniform across all states.

So this confirms i'm correct by saying this car is now deemed as a possible defect????

whoop de doo

there are people starving in this world and your worried about a numberplate cover?

you really wasted our time replying to this with that reply???? There are people starving and your making random smart ass comments???

lol jkz

You also dobbed yourself in for using your phone/camera while driving.

I was parked and the keys weren't in the ignition :blush:

pfft I've got one of those license plate covers with the black lines across it.

Driven past plenty of patrol cars and even had a patrol car tail me out of curiosity, and haven't had any problems

one of many rules in place that aren't really enforced I guess, there's all these p platers around my street with sh$tbox cars and cannon mufflers and they seem to get away with them even though they can't do modifications

That doesn't mean they wont get defected, just that they are running the risk of being defected, and their are people who get done for number plate covers.... even on these forums ive found them.... but i'm 100% sure that this rta car will never get defected for it where as if you get a smart ass highway patrol car you still have the possibility of getting done.

Black Widow Veteran

Black Widow

Posted
Posted

Ok firstly:

How do you know its an actual RTA company car? Maybe its just someone that really likes the RTA? Or has the initials RTA?

And secondly are you sure its not just a number plate frame? not a cover?

Kujotk Grand Master

Kujotk

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Ok firstly:

How do you know its an actual RTA company car? Maybe its just someone that really likes the RTA? Or has the initials RTA?

And secondly are you sure its not just a number plate frame? not a cover?

its even got the lines going across the numberplate in the dodgey photo....

and RTA will not let anyone choose a numberplate starting as RTA, especially RTA.002

there are RTA cars from RTA.000 - RTA.999

also its a WHITE toyota Aurion = company car lol

madbung Grand Master

madbung

Posted
Posted
So this confirms i'm correct by saying this car is now deemed as a possible defect????

Well no if you'll take the time to absorb what was written, it appears the licence plate cover you have pointed out falls within the legal guidelines ie: NOT illegal.

Must be clear, untinted and uncoloured, iii. Must have surfaces which are flat both on the side which faces the number plate and on the side which faces away from the vehicle, iv. Must have non-reflective characteristics and, v. Must have no unusual refractive characteristics. These requirements effectively prohibit number plate covers which have curved, domed, tinted or reflective surfaces from being fitted to a vehicle. Number plate covers which have lines or other markings on the surface which go over the number plate are also effectively prohibited. Regulation 222(2)(b) of the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1988 also requires that a number plate fitted to a vehicle must be clearly distinguishable and not be wholly or partially obscured

Looks flat and clear, no distortion and I can't see any lines on it.

You were able to take a clear picture of it weren't you? So...

Kujotk Grand Master

Kujotk

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Well no if you'll take the time to absorb what was written, it appears the licence plate cover you have pointed out falls within the legal guidelines ie: NOT illegal.

Must be clear, untinted and uncoloured, iii. Must have surfaces which are flat both on the side which faces the number plate and on the side which faces away from the vehicle, iv. Must have non-reflective characteristics and, v. Must have no unusual refractive characteristics. These requirements effectively prohibit number plate covers which have curved, domed, tinted or reflective surfaces from being fitted to a vehicle. Number plate covers which have lines or other markings on the surface which go over the number plate are also effectively prohibited. Regulation 222(2)(b) of the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1988 also requires that a number plate fitted to a vehicle must be clearly distinguishable and not be wholly or partially obscured

Looks flat and clear, no distortion and I can't see any lines on it.

You were able to take a clear picture of it weren't you? So...

Doesn't matter if I could take a clear photograph of the number plate or not, it is against their own regulations. I did read what was posted and it clearly says its "...effectively Prohibited." Open the photo again, use the zoom function and you can see lines across the cover. The RTA doesn't state that lines are acceptable if under a certain width. All in all there's 8 black painted lines across the numberplate that I can still make out even though the quality of the camera phone picture isn't very good. Imagine how much more obvious the lines are in person to grab my attention like that?

I still can't see why everyone jumps to defend the RTA when they make up allot of pointless (also allot of good) rules that ultimately cost us money in fines, even unintentional non dangerous defects.

A regulation is a regulation and I don't care who breaches it, no matter how small the infringement is. They say rules are there for a reason, are they not? Not all the rules are there for safety. A friend of mine got fined for having her Registration sticker on the tinted section of her front windshield, is this dangerous? Is she a hoon? No! but the regulation for sticking the sticker says it cannot be behind any tint, it has to be on naked glass on the windscreen or the left hand side of a fixed glass window. If she can get done for that, this Car should not have black lines across the numberplate.

madbung Grand Master

madbung

Posted
Posted (edited)

19" mon @ 1280x1024 zoomed, unzoomed and over zoomed.

Could be your shit camera resolution but I still see NO lines.

But hey if you say they're there thats good enough.

Lol

Edited by madbung
MaTBoY Grand Master

MaTBoY

Posted
Posted

It's def RTA. they have reserved all RTA and RTB plates.

I can read the plate... you could ready the plate... whats the problem? Sure if one of the letters was obscured it might be an issue.

I think you're touch the tip of a much larger ice berd. QUICK call ACA with your hot scoop!

Tezzah Experienced

Tezzah

Posted
Posted
It's def RTA. they have reserved all RTA and RTB plates.

I can read the plate... you could ready the plate... whats the problem? Sure if one of the letters was obscured it might be an issue.

I think you're touch the tip of a much larger ice berd. QUICK call ACA with your hot scoop!

Yet if the police officer didn't like the RTA driver, he would defect the car for an obscured license plate...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah. Was just wondering if you were having a small stroke or if there was some slur/gaf/inside joke that I wasn't aware of.
    • MBS206
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By MBS206 · Posted

      That was a fark up, it's Salamanca Place I was thinking of. And now I'm curious as to what potential slur/gaf I have caused with Salamander Road, ha ha!
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Was that deliberate?
    • Kinkstaah
      gtr hood match gt/gtt front fenders?

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
×
×
  • Create New...