Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, so I've installed the second card, but I'm not 100% convinced it's working properly.It SAYS that it's around 60fps but it sure doesn't feel that way.

Anyone here with a crossfire setup that can give me an approximate frame rate for BF3?

Settings are all ultra, at 1920x1200

There's no crossfire icon in any game as far as I'm aware?

Anyways, I think it was more to do with my unrealistic expectations than anything. I've turned MSAA off and now its pretty much always 120+ fps with Ultra everything so I'm happy with that.

I read this on Toms Hardware which was pretty useful to me:

In AMD’s Battlefield 3 documentation, the company makes a big deal about the difference between the Anti-Aliasing Post and Anti-Aliasing Deferred options, which toggle on and off Fast Approximate Anti-Aliasing and Multi-Sample Anti-Aliasing, respectively. Both features do different things, but have very disparate effects on performance.

It’s easy to see why AMD is so concerned with the use of Anti-Aliasing Deferred: it imparts a massive frame rate drop, which takes a card like the Radeon HD 6970 that might be playable at 2560x1600, or a Radeon HD 5850 at 1920x1080, and beats performance back quite a bit. Anti-Aliasing Post, on the other hand, though not always an effective approach, barely touches speed.

Perhaps more worrying for AMD is that, while the GeForce cards are also hit pretty hard by MSAA, the impact is far less detrimental. At no point does the addition of 4x MSAA take an Nvidia board from playable to unplayable (aside from maybe the GeForce GTX 285 at 1680x1050). AMD can’t say the same.

You’re at least safe turning Anti-Aliasing Post to High on AMD’s cards. Whether you want to mess with MSAA depends on how much performance you have “in reserve” to throw at eye candy.

Sauce

if your right click the Ati icon in your task back then go one of the options in there just have a look and you'll see an option for enable Crossfire logo in full screen game or something like that

but sounds like its working fine :D

Oops, deleted post just as you were replying.

As said, we're building this:

http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/

We've got 210 staff members generating a shitload of data (medical research, imaging, etc), so the bigger, the better. We're building one to start with, then possibly another two.

Just checked UMart; getting a quote off them now, they seem to have stock.

For something business related, wouldn't you be better off going a proper redundant, enterprise path? Especially then you'll have better upgrade paths in terms of expanding SANs with more trays, and then just growing LUNs.

Sure you'll pay more for it - but do you really want to risk important medical/research/etc data on that?

Does it actually run RAID or JBOD?

What are you doing for backups?

This is actually our backup box :P We already run a SATA Beast for main storage (as well as on people's machines).

Running RAID6 I think (my sysadmin's sorting all that stuff out), and we'll be using Crashplan Pro. We're moving off of Retrospect, because we're doing a hot-swap HDD set at the moment; sucks balls. Single threaded app with the server doing all the work is shit. Better to offload a little bit to the clients and have continuous rather than Retro just rolling through clients seeing one at a time.

  • 3 weeks later...

good luck finding an X6, they are EOL lolz

I got a few in stock, can get some more in... :domokun:

HDT90ZFBGRBOX PHENOM II X6 1090T 3.2GHZ 9MB AM3 BLK

HDT55TFBGRBOX PHENOM II X6 1055T 2.8GHZ 9MB AM3 (125W)

HDT75TFBGRBOX PHENON II X6 1075T 3.0MHZ 9MB AM3 125W

HDE00ZFBGRBOX PHENOM II X6 1100T

Edited by A-K

So I just took delivery of some Dell Precision T7500's at work for my whole team.

Dual Xeon X5647

2x16GB 1333MHz RAM (can go up to 6 of these for 96GB)

2x300GB SATA HDD (10,000RPM) RAID 0'd

1x120GB SATA3 SSD for OS

1x2TB SATA HDD (7,200RPM)

1 GB NVIDIA Quadro 600

plus dual U2410's.

bit of overkill for a bunch of dev's but meh. It's all deductible as R&D costs :P

bahaha Dell got our order wrong and shipped it with 256GB SSD's lawl.

  • 2 weeks later...

Just got one of these:

SteelSeries Sensei:

SteelSeries-Sensei.jpg

It has an ARM CPU inside it with about the same processing power as the original Pentium! Hahah!

The difference it's made to my accuracy is stunning, it tracks so much smoother and feels so much more responsive.

You have to remember to turn the sensitivity waaay down in games or it's much too twitchy.

Good investment, I recommend it :)

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...