Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got back from my 3000k road trip, Stag performed fine, got 10.5L/100km (9.5km/L), which i was happy with.

However, during the trip the intake developed a leak i think, idling fine but will no longer reach desired boost, about 0.05 bar below, and has a low pitch whistle sound above 0.5 bar, not there before and separate from the usual spooling sound. Done a quick check of hoses, and now thinking it may be around the turbo itself.

Anyone have any ideas on the most likely place for a leak on the turbo ? seals. gaskets etc

PS sydney drivers, the horn is not a blinker. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/
Share on other sites

hey mate. If you had a leak after the AFM, you notice the car will idle rough. Check to make sure you have no shaft play in the turbo. Thats the only thing that will make a high pitch noise under boost and possible lose of boost.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4333406
Share on other sites

update; pressure tested the intake system, held fine. No visible/audible exhaust leaks, but really need a dyno to check properly.

tested the PCV valve, faulty, should be a one-way valve, its leaking boost air into the crankcase from the intake manifold.

Not sure if this is the smoking gun im looking for but i wont go any further till I replace it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4334592
Share on other sites

update; pressure tested the intake system, held fine. No visible/audible exhaust leaks, but really need a dyno to check properly.

tested the PCV valve, faulty, should be a one-way valve, its leaking boost air into the crankcase from the intake manifold.

Not sure if this is the smoking gun im looking for but i wont go any further till I replace it.

I just went thru all this, or similar. While fitting the R34 smic I broke the seal on the intake hose to the turbo. Sounded like a CA spooling up. There is a thread on it. Even bought another turbo caus I thought mine was RS. I also found three leaks in the exhaust mannifold because of broken studs and a huge crack in the manni where the turbo bolts on. It was a long and frustrating experience as Mrs could not drive the manual Skys.

But now she runs like a Nissan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4334634
Share on other sites

Interesting point about the PCV valve. I was just thinking though that perhaps that is a bit backwards... I could be completely off here (someone please correct me?) but I think the PCV valve connection is to the intake side of the turbo, so the one-way valve is purely to prevent the manifold sucking air in under vacuum? I didn't think it had a connection to the boost side of the turbo? If it does then I don't trust mine either as it doesn't make a perfect one-way seal (but then no PCV valve I've ever played with ever has).

Edited by DaveB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4334892
Share on other sites

It is designed to suck air from the engine into the intake manifold under vacuum, and seal off under boost. I have cleaned out the carbon deposits in mine and it is still not a completely tight seal. Has anyone played with a brand new one ? Are they supposed to be air tight ?

Interesting point about the PCV valve. I was just thinking though that perhaps that is a bit backwards... I could be completely off here (someone please correct me?) but I think the PCV valve connection is to the intake side of the turbo, so the one-way valve is purely to prevent the manifold sucking air in under vacuum? I didn't think it had a connection to the boost side of the turbo? If it does then I don't trust mine either as it doesn't make a perfect one-way seal (but then no PCV valve I've ever played with ever has).
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4334983
Share on other sites

update; pressure tested the intake system, held fine. No visible/audible exhaust leaks, but really need a dyno to check properly.

tested the PCV valve, faulty, should be a one-way valve, its leaking boost air into the crankcase from the intake manifold.

Not sure if this is the smoking gun im looking for but i wont go any further till I replace it.

And how did you pressure test the intake system?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4335034
Share on other sites

And how did you pressure test the intake system?

real backyard stuff, blocked off the hose into the AFM (with a wine bottle), blocked off the reducer hose before the throttle (with a can of fly spray). clamped them up. Also clamped off a few other smaller hoses, pressurized the system with a bike pump. around 10psi, held fine, couldnt hear any leaks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4335151
Share on other sites

my money is on manifold to turbo gasket. if you've lost some boost pressure and are getting a whistling sound then i'd be checking the studs that hold the turbo to the manifold are done up tight

thanks, will check this next, although might just give it to Godzilla motorsport for them to do.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4335153
Share on other sites

my money is on manifold to turbo gasket. if you've lost some boost pressure and are getting a whistling sound then i'd be checking the studs that hold the turbo to the manifold are done up tight

When mine started sounding like a CA I went straight home and started stripping down caus I thought it was the turbo, which it wasn't.

It seems that there are many reasons to cause the "noise". My turbo to manni nuts were up tight but there was the crack right across the manni mounting

aperture, also the three leaks in the exhaust caus of broken studs. I came across the intake hose looseness on the way in but kept going to check the rear end of the turbo, which was fine. The stud problem needed fixing and was done. I am still not sure what was the exact cause and this still frustrates me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4335200
Share on other sites

Well I'll be... the PCV valve does appear to connect to the inlet manifold/plenum!? So when you're boosting, and getting the most blow-by, the pressure on the other side of the PCV valve is your boost pressure which means that it's least capable of doing its job...???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249984-boost-leak/#findComment-4335515
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...