Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now I say test because I'm using an application on my iPhone to test this. I was expecting <14.3 but have been getting between 14.4 - 15.1 depending on launch.

The reason i expected a certain time is due to a friend of mine getting a 14.4 i believe, in a bunky piece of shit s13 CA18 running like a brick who to all of my knowledge drives terribly.

The application asks for certain parameters and I put my weight as the stock 1320kg + my 75kg + a tank of fuel 60kg = 1455kg which if incorrect will effect the outcome, does this weight sound about right ?

also i think i could probably get faster because its listing my 60ft time on my best run of 14.42 as 2.57 sec, i understand that's quite high ?

my question is should i expect a faster 1/4 mile with these mods:

3" turbo back exhaust

3inch stainless intake with pod

FMIC

never dyno'd but this application says 160rwkw on my best run

also does that time sound unusual for the S13 ?

Ill post graph of run if anyone is interested, also its called dynolicious if any of you want to check it out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253470-r32-rb20-14-mile-tests/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

0-100 km/h = 6.43 sec

0-160 km/h = 13.87 sec

60' = 2.57 sec @ 45.2 km/h

1/8 mi = 9.51 sec @ 130 km/h

1000' = 12.18 sec @ 149.6 km/h

1/4 mi = 14.42 sec @ 166.3 km/h

max G's = 0.60 G's

peak power = 160rwkw

post-22805-1232467883_thumb.jpg

does this all seem consistent or should i worry it isnt accurate ?

if it is right, looking at my 60foot and final speed do i have much room to improve ?

if this thing is right, you can do in the high 13 sec. 2.57 60ft time sucks, you need to get in the 2.0-2.2 and you'll hit 13.

thats what i thought, was expecting a 0 - 100 closer to 6 than i been getting. Having trouble launching with traction. very inconsistent. dunno weather to dump it on launch at a lower rpm or ease off the throttle at a higher rpm

might also need some new tyres. ive had the same crappy no name ones on since i bought the car. keep putting off RE01's till i get new wheels >_>

Take it to a real strip. Where are you managing to run a 1/4mile on the street anyway? 166kmh is well over the speed limit :thumbsup:

P.S. with 183rwkw I ran a 13.9 @ 103mph, 2.3sec 60' (no traction in 1st).

Edited by bubba

Bubba, he said he's doing it on his iPhone (ie it's a simulation).

thrtytwo,

A RB20DET only puts 160kW at the flywheel, and only when it's new. I doubt with your minimal mods you would have 130kW at the rears.

The application asks for certain parameters and I put my weight as the stock 1320kg + my 75kg + a tank of fuel 60kg = 1455kg which if incorrect will effect the outcome, does this weight sound about right ?

never dyno'd but this application says 160rwkw on my best run

also does that time sound unusual for the S13 ?

The weight only comes into the power calculation, so the acceleration time should be reasonably accurate as long as the hardware and software are up to it.

If you run at the track use the iPhone as well to compare and post up results.

Yeah the weight shouldn't matter unless you are wanting to estimate power - the time etc SHOULD be fairly ok if the phone is mounted well and the road is good etc. We tried out my mates Dynolicious setup on his iPhone and the results seemed all screwed though I had a look through the settings and the rollout was "0" etc which can make your 60ft/ET etc look worse than if you ran it at the strip. Check the config and see if the rollout is set to something sensible, 166kph should have you in the 13s.

Things like GTimers come default with sensible rollout and "start timing" g-Force settings so are a bit more realistic from the outset.

I say track it and really find out.

To be honest I think the iphone meter is way off.

An exhaust and FMIC has your Rb20 pulling 103mph over the quarter? That is big MPH for not many mods!

Considering stock is low 90mphs at best, thats is a massive increase.

Not ragging on your car but I believe it is far off being accurate.

My 34GTT pulls a 14.0 with a cat back and boost, at a best trap speed (not on the quickest run) of 99mph, for comparison.

Also on topic, 2.5 seconds for a 60ft is pretty slow, but its not easy to get it right. Anything near the 2 flat is doing pretty well. Whatever you shave off in the 60ft, double it and thats what will be off your time by the end (generally speaking this is pretty accurate)

If your car really is hitting 166kmph, you should be well into the 13s!

Bubba, he said he's doing it on his iPhone (ie it's a simulation).

thrtytwo,

A RB20DET only puts 160kW at the flywheel, and only when it's new. I doubt with your minimal mods you would have 130kW at the rears.

No, I think he's using an app on his iPhone which uses the GPS features to time himself. It's not all virtual :)

I say track it and really find out.

To be honest I think the iphone meter is way off.

An exhaust and FMIC has your Rb20 pulling 103mph over the quarter? That is big MPH for not many mods!

Considering stock is low 90mphs at best, thats is a massive increase.

I managed a 100mph on my first drag day of my life with my rb20 with only exhaust & fmic, stock boost at 10-11 psi. and my clutch started to slip on 3rd gear..

I managed a 100mph on my first drag day of my life with my rb20 with only exhaust & fmic, stock boost at 10-11 psi. and my clutch started to slip on 3rd gear..

Really? Whoa... there are some major discrepancies with results in the drag area. I know there are many variables and we are talking about 20 year old cars which doesnt help, but thats good mph.

On the same track (We race at benaraby raceway) my mates SR sil, hiflo turbo, cooler, zorst, 17ish psi boost managed 98mph. Obviously you would expect higher if you are pulling 100 with such minimal mods, considering the SR has bucket loads or torque.

Without coming up with excuses most cars seem to be abit down on what they should be at Benaraby.

Then again, a dead stock JZX100 Chaser was pulling 94ish MPH, which is pretty much the same MPH I was pulling back when I first got the 34. Hmmmm its interesting. But from my expericences of sitting and watching/racing against, most 32 skylines with coolers and boost are not coming near 100mph.

Congrats to those who do though, you are obviously making some good power ;)

Well out of 3x 32's that I personally know over here all making the same power (my RB30 making an early 250rwhp, and two mates with RB20's sporting 25 turbos and all the usually bolt on stuff.. one untuned the other a de+t tuned), we've all run 102/103mph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...