Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now I say test because I'm using an application on my iPhone to test this. I was expecting <14.3 but have been getting between 14.4 - 15.1 depending on launch.

The reason i expected a certain time is due to a friend of mine getting a 14.4 i believe, in a bunky piece of shit s13 CA18 running like a brick who to all of my knowledge drives terribly.

The application asks for certain parameters and I put my weight as the stock 1320kg + my 75kg + a tank of fuel 60kg = 1455kg which if incorrect will effect the outcome, does this weight sound about right ?

also i think i could probably get faster because its listing my 60ft time on my best run of 14.42 as 2.57 sec, i understand that's quite high ?

my question is should i expect a faster 1/4 mile with these mods:

3" turbo back exhaust

3inch stainless intake with pod

FMIC

never dyno'd but this application says 160rwkw on my best run

also does that time sound unusual for the S13 ?

Ill post graph of run if anyone is interested, also its called dynolicious if any of you want to check it out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253470-r32-rb20-14-mile-tests/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

0-100 km/h = 6.43 sec

0-160 km/h = 13.87 sec

60' = 2.57 sec @ 45.2 km/h

1/8 mi = 9.51 sec @ 130 km/h

1000' = 12.18 sec @ 149.6 km/h

1/4 mi = 14.42 sec @ 166.3 km/h

max G's = 0.60 G's

peak power = 160rwkw

post-22805-1232467883_thumb.jpg

does this all seem consistent or should i worry it isnt accurate ?

if it is right, looking at my 60foot and final speed do i have much room to improve ?

if this thing is right, you can do in the high 13 sec. 2.57 60ft time sucks, you need to get in the 2.0-2.2 and you'll hit 13.

thats what i thought, was expecting a 0 - 100 closer to 6 than i been getting. Having trouble launching with traction. very inconsistent. dunno weather to dump it on launch at a lower rpm or ease off the throttle at a higher rpm

might also need some new tyres. ive had the same crappy no name ones on since i bought the car. keep putting off RE01's till i get new wheels >_>

Take it to a real strip. Where are you managing to run a 1/4mile on the street anyway? 166kmh is well over the speed limit :thumbsup:

P.S. with 183rwkw I ran a 13.9 @ 103mph, 2.3sec 60' (no traction in 1st).

Edited by bubba

Bubba, he said he's doing it on his iPhone (ie it's a simulation).

thrtytwo,

A RB20DET only puts 160kW at the flywheel, and only when it's new. I doubt with your minimal mods you would have 130kW at the rears.

The application asks for certain parameters and I put my weight as the stock 1320kg + my 75kg + a tank of fuel 60kg = 1455kg which if incorrect will effect the outcome, does this weight sound about right ?

never dyno'd but this application says 160rwkw on my best run

also does that time sound unusual for the S13 ?

The weight only comes into the power calculation, so the acceleration time should be reasonably accurate as long as the hardware and software are up to it.

If you run at the track use the iPhone as well to compare and post up results.

Yeah the weight shouldn't matter unless you are wanting to estimate power - the time etc SHOULD be fairly ok if the phone is mounted well and the road is good etc. We tried out my mates Dynolicious setup on his iPhone and the results seemed all screwed though I had a look through the settings and the rollout was "0" etc which can make your 60ft/ET etc look worse than if you ran it at the strip. Check the config and see if the rollout is set to something sensible, 166kph should have you in the 13s.

Things like GTimers come default with sensible rollout and "start timing" g-Force settings so are a bit more realistic from the outset.

I say track it and really find out.

To be honest I think the iphone meter is way off.

An exhaust and FMIC has your Rb20 pulling 103mph over the quarter? That is big MPH for not many mods!

Considering stock is low 90mphs at best, thats is a massive increase.

Not ragging on your car but I believe it is far off being accurate.

My 34GTT pulls a 14.0 with a cat back and boost, at a best trap speed (not on the quickest run) of 99mph, for comparison.

Also on topic, 2.5 seconds for a 60ft is pretty slow, but its not easy to get it right. Anything near the 2 flat is doing pretty well. Whatever you shave off in the 60ft, double it and thats what will be off your time by the end (generally speaking this is pretty accurate)

If your car really is hitting 166kmph, you should be well into the 13s!

Bubba, he said he's doing it on his iPhone (ie it's a simulation).

thrtytwo,

A RB20DET only puts 160kW at the flywheel, and only when it's new. I doubt with your minimal mods you would have 130kW at the rears.

No, I think he's using an app on his iPhone which uses the GPS features to time himself. It's not all virtual :)

I say track it and really find out.

To be honest I think the iphone meter is way off.

An exhaust and FMIC has your Rb20 pulling 103mph over the quarter? That is big MPH for not many mods!

Considering stock is low 90mphs at best, thats is a massive increase.

I managed a 100mph on my first drag day of my life with my rb20 with only exhaust & fmic, stock boost at 10-11 psi. and my clutch started to slip on 3rd gear..

I managed a 100mph on my first drag day of my life with my rb20 with only exhaust & fmic, stock boost at 10-11 psi. and my clutch started to slip on 3rd gear..

Really? Whoa... there are some major discrepancies with results in the drag area. I know there are many variables and we are talking about 20 year old cars which doesnt help, but thats good mph.

On the same track (We race at benaraby raceway) my mates SR sil, hiflo turbo, cooler, zorst, 17ish psi boost managed 98mph. Obviously you would expect higher if you are pulling 100 with such minimal mods, considering the SR has bucket loads or torque.

Without coming up with excuses most cars seem to be abit down on what they should be at Benaraby.

Then again, a dead stock JZX100 Chaser was pulling 94ish MPH, which is pretty much the same MPH I was pulling back when I first got the 34. Hmmmm its interesting. But from my expericences of sitting and watching/racing against, most 32 skylines with coolers and boost are not coming near 100mph.

Congrats to those who do though, you are obviously making some good power ;)

Well out of 3x 32's that I personally know over here all making the same power (my RB30 making an early 250rwhp, and two mates with RB20's sporting 25 turbos and all the usually bolt on stuff.. one untuned the other a de+t tuned), we've all run 102/103mph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...