Jump to content
SAU Community

Devostating Dyno Results For R34

scottmiller
 Share

Recommended Posts

scottmiller Enthusiast

scottmiller

Posted
Posted

hey i recently brought a skyline r34 gtt everything is stock, so i decided to put it on the dyno to see what is puts out in only managed to do 184bhp (i think that it feels faster than that), i was told that they came stock with 280hp is that right, anyway i was devo when i saw the results so i booked it in to get a after market ecu and an electronic boost controller (getting done on 17th). i was wondering what the next upgrade would be best to make more power out of my car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/255972-devostating-dyno-results-for-r34/
Share on other sites
rtune Experienced

rtune

Posted
Posted
hey i recently brought a skyline r34 gtt everything is stock, so i decided to put it on the dyno to see what is puts out in only managed to do 184bhp (i think that it feels faster than that), i was told that they came stock with 280hp is that right, anyway i was devo when i saw the results so i booked it in to get a after market ecu and an electronic boost controller (getting done on 17th). i was wondering what the next upgrade would be best to make more power out of my car.

stock r34 gtt (neo) is 145kw at the wheels, which is 194bhp so your result is right on the money.

See: http://nissanskyline.6te.net/GTT_spec.htm

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
stock r34 gtt (neo) is 145kw at the wheels, which is 194bhp so your result is right on the money.

See: http://nissanskyline.6te.net/GTT_spec.htm

I wouldn't trust that site if my life depended on it.

1. The information was all ripped from these forums about 4 years ago.

2. Its out of date, never updated

The best info is always found by searching these forums, rather than some muppet who claimed limited info from these forums as his own.

IMO that site should be shut down as there is so much wrong with it that it gives me a headache to read

ANYWAY - 206kw = 280hp

184bhp is about 134rwkw... so that sounds exactly right give or take a 10kw difference for dyno's etc

So realistically there is nothing devastating about it at all, its a factory car making pretty much exactly the factory HP/KW.

To be honest you need a full exhaust etc before a ECU/Tune... You wont get anywhere near the gains with JUST a ECU/Tune as you would if you put a decent flowing exhaust on there

trel Mentor

trel

Posted
Posted

don't be upset dude, as others have said. if the car is stock (completely) then thats RIGHT on the money on what your car should be making. Look at getting an exhaust and an EBC running around 10psi and you'll be making about 160rwkw maybe less depending on the dyno.

some_cs_student Veteran

some_cs_student

Posted
Posted
hey i recently brought a skyline r34 gtt everything is stock, so i decided to put it on the dyno to see what is puts out in only managed to do 184bhp (i think that it feels faster than that), i was told that they came stock with 280hp is that right

<cut>

i was wondering what the next upgrade would be best to make more power out of my car.

First question, no, that's wrong.

Second question, there are threads on this, what exhaust system are your running? And are you running a decent cat converter?

Yes, people often go the ECU + more boost + exhaust system and either a pod filter or airbox panel filter upgrade + good tune and get a nice gain :D

Ultimategtr Proficient

Ultimategtr

Posted
Posted

Hey, maybe im a bit confused, i thougth that the GT-T's came out with 206kw(flywheel) as well as the GTR? Ok maybe not 206 but it should still have considerably more then the R33 (187).

So on paper given a high 20% D/T loss, a healthy GTT should see around 160-170rwkw stock form am I not correct in thinking that? 184hp is a mere 137rwkw.

When was it serviced last?

Could you post up your dyno sheet by any chance?

scottmiller Enthusiast

scottmiller

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hey, maybe im a bit confused, i thougth that the GT-T's came out with 206kw(flywheel) as well as the GTR? Ok maybe not 206 but it should still have considerably more then the R33 (187).

So on paper given a high 20% D/T loss, a healthy GTT should see around 160-170rwkw stock form am I not correct in thinking that? 184hp is a mere 137rwkw.

When was it serviced last?

Could you post up your dyno sheet by any chance?

yeah i thought it would put out more than what it did, last service was about a month ago

yeah here is dyno sheet

post-57941-1234052813_thumb.jpg

Al Grand Master

Al

Posted
Posted

If a mechanic advised you to spend money on an ecu and boost controller, before exhaust and even a better quality air filter (in the airbox), you should go else where; It seems he is just interested in making the most money from you and doesn't care about your interests.

Fair enough he may have gotten confused about the power figures etc, but any good mechanic would recommend upgrading the factory exhaust system first.

trel Mentor

trel

Posted
Posted

guys, seriously now, a "non-happy dyno" on a stock car will go anywhere from 120-140rwkw depending on the health of the car and other factors. as al said too, you're mechanic is probably saying that to you to squeeze $$ out of you. oh dude your car is really low on power you need this this and this now to make it go hard.

first things first. get an exhaust, a cai, and maybe a hi-flow cat. you will notice a very nice gain alone just with those mods.

Kujotk Grand Master

Kujotk

Posted
Posted

if your going to be boosting it id be putting a larger intercooler at the same time.....

also the r34 gtt is alittle heavier than the r33 gtst so the extra engine power is almost cancled out so not much differnece in actual real life power between stock r33 and stock r34...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...