Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by rsx84

im in the site at this very moment using a translator assist and couldnt work out why two prices, translation makes no sence, thanks.

heh, heh... thats what I`m here for! (kinda)

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so rezz can u get us some stuff?

260km cluster is at the top of my list

followed by a front bar

i got my rb20 yesterday...uses a map sensor so no need for afm after all. but she idles all over the shop something about a open loop control or sumthing...um....help!

Originally posted by rsx84

Rezz, when you say exchange it for one of thiers, is that that they produce the 260km panel?  i did notice that they are completly different gages to the ones mine has (in terms of display levels).

They outsource the the speedo "faces" from another company. They only change the face and the little speedo mechanism inside as far as I know, so you give them yours (with 25,000 odd yen)and they give you another reconditioned "260km/h" cluster in return... the work they do on the cluster is quite minimal.

Hi Guys,

Have a '81 HR30 coupe L20E & 5 speed in the garage, seems to be no demand for these old girls. Have offered it for sale complete, but no bites, next weekend will start dismantling it.

One guy has already put dibs on the taillights & window seals, car is virtually complete...anyone looking for trim pieces etc?

And what would a DR30 grill sell for? Every other R30 I have seen has some variation of a honeycomb-type grill on it, but not this very early one (chassis number low twenty thousand).

Russ

Timaru, N.Z.

[email protected]

Gus this is the dr30 updated grill

http://community.webshots.com/scripts/edit...security=NIXjvs

when you say got dibs on window seals is that the rubber around the out side as im looking for the seal between the front door window and rear window,

rsx84,

The grill is the 'prior-term' to quote babelfish/r30.co.jp, is identical to all the early DR30's.

And sorry, yes, the strips of rubber between the front door window & rear window have been claimed by StageFumer11.

99% of other parts are available, if it comes to wrecking it, I will strip what I can and put it away in the garage. The price of early RX stuff is going ballistic, I guess the demand will outstrip supply soon for R30 stuff.

hmm could be interested in a few things

nz could be a doozey for shipping tho

im still keen for a dr30 front bar despite the cost of freight and the greedy middle man

oh yeah...the 260k dash cluster, the tach goes to 9 grand as well doesnt it as opposed to the aussie ones reading to 8??

gus, always the way full into that 1% that is just not there, no worrys carn't think of any thing else that i might need, wait a minute what rims do you have? that translator still didnt help much.

stu, i think there is also one that goes to 10, not that there would be any need to see it hit 10 grand(bang)!!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...