Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Going to start tracking my car and Im after a helmet.

I was wondering what is the most preferred helmet... Open face or Full face?

Full face seems quite restricted in air flow, as it covers your face and being in a car you dont have wind passing over the helmet..although it looks better and the stig has one! :worship:

Open face is much easier to put on (especially with my glasses) but its hard to find one which doesnt look suited for a scooter :)

What would be the best design for a trackday helmet :blink:

Thanks

Patrick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257771-open-face-vs-full-face-helmet/
Share on other sites

This is three for an open face.

I run a Sparco mainly because it's comfortable for my head shape, and as I wear glasses a full face is just way too much of a pain. Glasses mean even the Stilo open face with the built in microphone boom are a pain.

I have a full face and voteing for open face..

interesting, could you explain why you voting for the open face?

cheers all for response.

Will most likely get an open face helmet. The only open-faced helmets at bike shops are $100, and there isnt anything above. Rest are all full-faced..

Tried one of those full face flip-up's which convert to openface, but they feel very top heavy when its opened hehe

i have always had full face ones but i think if i had to buy another id get an open face.

the full face gets the safety first tick as if you hit a wall hard im sure you want to smile afterwards. also i gess in a roll over ect with flying glass ect it will save your face.

ful face is you use a seat belt

open if you use harness's

saw a guy who smashed his face up with and open face on the steering wheel (would not have happend if it was full face and he had harnesses)

when i stuck my car in the wall my head hit the wheel full face all the way if you ask me

Absolutely full face is safer, and some events will not accept open face for that reason. No way would I go open face (I know some rally types like it, easier to see and speak) but there is more than enough field of view for track work with a closed face helmet.

Recently needed a new helmet for a track day, my old one – think cheap Chinese (Bike) helmet wore through and was in pretty average condition after only 4 years and a handful of uses. I initially went out looking for an open face, but was persuaded after trying a few on. Arai has a close face helmet with an extra wide eye port. Best of both worlds I think, closed face, but with great visibility & comfort. Was happy paying more for quality.

I think it all depends on what you use it for, if your only going to do club days and wear a lap/sash belt get a Fullface.

If your looking at doing more full on stuff where your spending longer periods of time in the car, wearing a harness consider an open face.

I feel so much more comfortable in an open face i don't think I could possibly wear a full face again.

Don't buy the cheapest available, there is a reason why they are cheap! Most good helmets start about $6-700, but you may find sales where they can be had for more like $500.

open face/full face - your choice. I'll add my vote for full face helmets because you're wearing them for safety - a full face offers more protection. Just seriously consider this article before purchasing an expensive helmet that meets Snell standards. The results of their impact tests are a real eye-opener.

http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/gearbox/...view/index.html

ful face is you use a seat belt

open if you use harness's

saw a guy who smashed his face up with and open face on the steering wheel (would not have happend if it was full face and he had harnesses)

when i stuck my car in the wall my head hit the wheel full face all the way if you ask me

I agree completely as another person who's run into a wall (though luckily didn't head butt the wheel). There is no way i'd wear an open face helmet at a speed event.

A secondary consideration is additional protection from flying glass and debris in an acco, as well as some (but not heaps of) additional protection in a fire.

Forget safety. I would only ever use a full face helmet because of the risk of an accident. ,I have never been injured, thank god, but i have always been thankful for wearing a full face helmet as with a simple drop of the visor nobody can be sure who was driving and after returning to the pits after the accident you can claim it wasnt you driving

Full face all the way.... a great analgy for you...

"A full face helmet is just like a condom".... I'd rather have one on me for safety sake and not need it, than need it and not have it ....

So in short i would rather have the full face, just for the off chance you are in a pickel of a moment

:P

  • 3 months later...

Opening and old thread here, I'd go a full face helmet as well, even in a closed top car.

I hit a seagull dead centre in the windscreen at over 200kp/h on the main straight at PI a few years ago, this shattered the windscreen and sprayed glass all over me. If I hadn't had the full face helmet on, I most likely would have had serious eye damage, as well as major facial cuts. The glass hit the visor hard enough to gouge the material, so I would hate to think what it would have done to my skin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...