Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thought i might add to this awesome e85 thread, during my z32 ownership there was a lot of talk about ethanol causing corrosion to injectors. In an early model z32 89-94 they ran pintle style injectors which recieved constant 12v powering the injectors even when the car is off, when using ethanol the alcohol creates a conductive bridge which caused corrosion over time. The later model z32 95+ were fitted with popett style injectors and did not have 12v powering injectors when the key is off, no injector failures have been reported with this setup.

It is a common mod in the z32 community to rewire the the injectors to only power 12v when the key is on, to stop the corrosion on pintle style injectors. On poppet style injectors there have been no reported failures even with the 12v circuit still intact. I would assume other Nissans of the same era might share similar wiring circuit for the injectors. Definitely something to look into if running e85, hope i didnt open up a can of worms :whistling:

Edited by linkems

it would be better if caltex would just make e70 and e85 only, and tell us the dates for the changes....

but i'm guessing they are aware of cold start issues and aren't willing to risk it on such a big $$$ venture

the caltex e85 will be aimed at normal cars, pushing normal revs in normal conditions, with the driver noticing no difference between pulp on cold start

that's why i'm going to stick with the manildra ethanol...

Yeah, the variance as I mentioned in GT's thread is between 70% and 85%. This is FAR too much variance. We need the ability to change the map ourselves at any time, and we need to KNOW the percentage when we fill up.

Hell, what if only half the servo's tank of E85 has been used when the truck arrives to fill it up with E70....then we will be filling up with ~E77.5, right? What if there was more or less of the previous fuel in there when we fill...we will never know the actual percentage coming out of the pump. The closest we'll get, is knowing what the tanks were filled with last.

This will not work for us.

Better give up now then ey?

Flex fuel cars have ethanol content detectors in the lines to adjust the mapping. They output a voltage to tell the ecu what percentage is in the lines, these could be fitted and wired directly to most standalone or p!ggyback computers and control a secondary map.

I run a wideband and would simply add 5 litres of 98 to the tank (keeping an eye on the afr) or swap to a different map.

I agree the Manildra blend seems to be the best option but if a servo pops up near me I will be using it regardless. 22k's for a fill is a bit excessive. They will only change the blend once a year and will hopefully warn the customers first.

I agree the Manildra blend seems to be the best option but if a servo pops up near me I will be using it regardless.

Agreed. Something is better than nothing for people that aren't as "blessed" to get the good shit :D

it's funny though, as Powerplus (manildra) take on it is that Australia does not require a winter mix, so i'm not sure why Caltex believe the need is there... would they want to push as much petrol as possible? probably bigger margins

If they only use the winter mix (E70) for say 2 months of the year, hopefully Powerplus will be more readily available and we won't have to worry about having limited servo's for a couple months of the year. Most of us make do at the moment as it is, i'm sure we'll be ok for the winter months.

as i said before, giving up servo real estate to ethanol pumps is a huge $$$ venture....

caltex will want nothing but good press from this venture and people having to crank their cars more than once will result in people saying it's shit.

also.. ethanol rated tanks are ~40k a pop aswell... so that's already a ~4 mil outlay for the 100 proposed pumps

as i said before, giving up servo real estate to ethanol pumps is a huge $$$ venture....

caltex will want nothing but good press from this venture and people having to crank their cars more than once will result in people saying it's shit.

also.. ethanol rated tanks are ~40k a pop aswell... so that's already a ~4 mil outlay for the 100 proposed pumps

Subsidised to some extent I think, I know the US govt definitely cover the costs of servo conversion.

My workmates say they get pissed just driving behind me when its cold, smells heavily of ethanol. I guess people will have to get used to the different smell. :ermm:

My workmates say they get pissed just driving behind me when its cold, smells heavily of ethanol. I guess people will have to get used to the different smell. :(

I just tuned my car on a 50/50 ethanol / BP98 mix on Monday and it smells so sweeeeet :ermm:

if my car only sees use every month or two what will the e85 do sitting in my tank/lines?

Still just sit there?

All tanks are sealed so no moisture can get in the tank or lines and from my testing it doesnt go "off" like 98 does after a month or two. I have pure ethanol that has been stored for a few years, I should mix up my own batch and see how it goes...

It wont eat your lines out in a few months if that's what you were trying to ask. It seems to be a popular misconception due to the problems with methanol storage and acidity.

^^ if a tank is completely sealed how can 98 go off?

tanks aren't sealed, they have a breather on them which goes to your charcoal canister. 98 goes off because the volatile chemicals evaporate, ethanol is 85% high octane stuff so if you lose some ethanol to evaporation all that happens is you have a bit less fuel than when you started. petrol is low octane base with some high octane additions and if these evaporate then you are left with shit fuel.

the main danger with ethanol is when it absorbs moisture, it will form two different layers in the tank with the water concentrated in one of the layers and this is obviously bad for your motor. it's a much bigger problem in boats because it's easier to get water contamination, in a car it's not so bad but something to be aware of if you let the car sit for long periods of time (especially outside - in a garage it would be fine).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...