Jump to content
SAU Community

Joeyjoejoe's E85 Tuning Adventutres


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

15w50 isn't thick for an RB motor. the block design is from the late 80's and the unopened ones are all up around 150,000 - 200,000 now

for everyday pulp i'm usuing castrol edge 10w60 these days as i drive only 5 mins to work and the engine never even gets hot, but if the car ever becomes track only i'm just gonna go motul 300v lemans 20w60.

15w50 in a motul 300v or 6100 is a great compromise for engines that see lots of high revs

the oil pumps in RB's are very high pressure and the temps on track can really soar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially if its an RB26.

When i was at Advan we used nothing but 300V 20W60 in GTR's and after pulling several down for freshen ups i can say the oilis awesome. Because of this i will use nothing but the 300V in my own car.

You certainly pay a premium for 300V but if it means the engine lives longer who is going to complain

Edited by ido09s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without trying to turn this into an oil thread, Ive been under the impression from this forum that a 40w oil was plenty for most RB engines..

Now I believe thicker oils are better for older engines and engines that see a lot of hardwork, I even debated so in another thread to alot of people that swear a 40w was more than adequate for any RB.

Even you have said many times Hamish that you always used motul 4100 or has that bearing failure cause a change of heart.. :P

personally I just use the 8100 xces but I have considered the 6100, but what is the advantage of it and why is it recomended for Ethanol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For most intents and purposes, the 10w40 will be perfect for your average RB...but everyone's situation is different - to some, the 15w50 is a better fit. You should try different oil brands and viscosities until you settle on something that works for your own application. You aren't going to kill your engine in the 5000km that you spend testing an oil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without trying to turn this into an oil thread, Ive been under the impression from this forum that a 40w oil was plenty for most RB engines..

Now I believe thicker oils are better for older engines and engines that see a lot of hardwork, I even debated so in another thread to alot of people that swear a 40w was more than adequate for any RB.

Even you have said many times Hamish that you always used motul 4100 or has that bearing failure cause a change of heart.. :P

personally I just use the 8100 xces but I have considered the 6100, but what is the advantage of it and why is it recomended for Ethanol.

I had always used turbolight, and I was happy with it. As a daily driver, the car absolutely loved it! I still sell it every day to people with jap motors that are just for daily drivers, but you are correct, that bearing failure has made me re-think. I lean on my motors pretty hard and I feel the extra protection of the heavier weight is worth it.

the motul 6100 synergie 15w50 is recommended for gas and diesel motors. It has a slight mineral content that allows it to absorb small ammounts of water, which makes it perfect for e85 applications.

the 8100 series is aimed at newer cars than ones running RB motors and due to it's thinner nature I would recommend going a slightly different route. what weight are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

the motul 6100 synergie 15w50 is recommended for gas and diesel motors. It has a slight mineral content that allows it to absorb small amounts of water, which makes it perfect for e85 applications.

Ok now i gets it. :thumbsup:

I think Im using 5-40 (may be 10-40), car was always run on Mobil 1 but motul was on sale when i went to buy it.

I was under the impression light viscosity were recomended to lubricate turbos on startup, but I always let my car warm up a so little heavier wouldnt hurt.

Still haven't got my E85 tune :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the pertinent thing is what the running oil temperatures are and obviously in a track situation it will be higher in an engine without improved water and oil cooling systems . I know of people who club raced RBs and used 10W60 oils all the time , they freely admitted that they could have had better road fuel consumption and a bit more power on the street because of lower viscocity oils reduced oil sheer drag .

Personally I think the best of both worlds is to use a thermostactically controlled oil cooler system and slightly lower viscosity oils . The oil thermostat is there to make sure the oil cooler does zip until it reaches a certain point ie 90-100 deg C . The say 10W40 oil lubricates with less drag and the oil cooler keeps it from overheating when worked hard .

Just as a heads up GL Lubricants in Sydney is bringing in some of the various Mobil 1 oils not normally sold in Australia and the ones that interest me are the synthetic 4T Racing bike oils . I've used this in 15W50 and while I've had no issues with it I'll change to the 10W40 viscosity when it becomes available soon .

These 4T Racing synthetics are not dedicated race oils but they are very high in ZDDP or Zinc and Phos which are anti wear additives fast disapearing in many current "Green Era" oils because they poison Cats over time .

From memory the pricing will be around 12-13 a quart and available also in 6 quart cartons .

Food for thought , cheers A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I know of people who club raced RBs and used 10W60 oils all the time , they freely admitted that they could have had better road fuel consumption and a bit more power on the street because of lower viscocity oils reduced oil sheer drag .

so ant, what are your thought's on using say 300v 15w50 or 20w60 with it's advertised zero sheer factor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Transmission synchros feel pretty bad at this point in my car and sometimes the clutch feels like it has an inconsistent engagement point in the pedal travel. I figure if I'm going to swap in a new transmission I may as well also put in a new clutch. Obvious candidates are ATS's pull-type twin plate carbon clutch, Nismo Super Coppermix Twin, or some organic clutch option I haven't figured out yet. I have searched this stuff to death at this point and still don't feel all that confident in making a decision. Target power is not much. ~330 kW at the wheels max. I ballpark the torque spec at 600 N-m. The stock clutch feels a little light so a little heavier is ok but I would say no more than 15-20% additional pedal effort. For some reason most clutch manufacturers want to keep this stuff a secret but the Coppermix Twin is 950 kg clamp load so I figure it can't be too much heavier than stock. The hang-up I have is some people mentioning that the clutch is very grabby which sounds like a pain. The stock clutch is almost too easy to modulate so I don't mind if it requires more precision than that but I don't want to deal with something that feels like I'm getting rear-ended at every traffic light. Also I see some mention of the release bearing carrier sizing requiring some work which sounds like something that might complicate installation? It would be good to know exactly what is needed here for a 1995 R33 GTR. The ATS clutch is supposedly the best but I've seen some complaints that they wear out easily and also slip when cold. I don't know how much of that is true but the cost is also huge compared to even the Nismo Coppermix twin plate. It's also unsprung which normally I would reject immediately but supposedly carbon clutches don't need it. The higher clamp load at 1300 kg is also a little concerning but to me more clamp load seems like it inevitably means more pedal effort and also more strain on the engine crank thrust bearings.  This is a street car and despite being a weekend car I seem to spend a lot of time crawling in severe traffic congestion with it anyways so I will gladly pay to have something that is easy to drive on and will hold the power with no unexpected headaches. I really don't want to do a clutch twice.
    • Grease the poly bushes as your first order of business. Moly grease. Spanner check everything else. Inspect LCA inner bushes.
    • It's usually associated with a muffler. Often in the middle of the muffler, sometimes at an inlet. Not removable by just slipping something out. usually needs butchery (read outright replacement of the muffler). There's absolutely nothing magic about any Jap exhaust brand. Totally generic. Totally replaceable with anything else that will do the job. I've replaced the centre muffler in mine a couple of times.
    • I've had a 9280, 9280's in stock form produce a bit of a whine when coming on unlike the 9180 so you may already like the turbo sound as it is.
    • So everytime the car is changing momentum, say you were going forward, and then you brake, itll do the creaking  and then wont happen when you brake again while still going forward. but once you put it into reverse and then you brake itll creak, but wont creak any more after while still reversing. And then again, when you go back to forward and the first time you brake, itll creak.  ( note will only happen the first time you brake when traveling a direction ). Wont happen, when youre going up speed bumps or hitting a pothole etc. Sound comes from Front left area.    I'm unsure as to what might be causing this sound so if anyone has any suggestions please. Ive got a set of R34 GTT brakes that I will be installing soon too. (and disregard the gutter rashes, from previous owner(s)... ) Otherwise, it has a shot set of Tein Coilovers, original bushings except poly on tension rods. Car has 138k kms. Video reference :   
×
×
  • Create New...