Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

according to the turbo builder there is a .56 and .63 rear housing size. i'm trying to determine if i have the .63

if it's the .56 then i guess it's probably not worth the change over, as you've already pointed out. I will however seriously consider the change if i have the .63 or can get a .63

according to the turbo builder there is a .56 and .63 rear housing size. i'm trying to determine if i have the .63

if it's the .56 then i guess it's probably not worth the change over, as you've already pointed out. I will however seriously consider the change if i have the .63 or can get a .63

R33 is smaller = .56 or whatever

R34 is larger = .63 or whatever

OP6 (via search) - has always been .63.

So you know where the base is to work out backwards in this instance that R33 would be smaller than .63... ie .56

true, but i'm getting confused as previous posts indicate the R33 is .48 and the R34 can be EITHER .56 or .63 - Al previously mentioned that the 34 as TWO different rear housings.

mythbusters ahoy

GTR twin turbos are 0.48 a/r rear

so therefore a single GTS turbo would be larger, as its a big single, so 0.56 a/r rear for GTS turbo sounds about right

and 0.63 a/r for the OP6 sounds about right again - OP6 being for VG30 single turbo setup

The turbine housing A/R number is just that - a number .

The important thing is the application of the largest of the three housings (OP6 one) - which was a four cam single turbo VG30DET .

I think the best way to look at them is 2L size , 2.5L size and 3L size .

I'd say if you fitted the OP6 housing to an otherwise std R33 GTS25T you would get a noticable lag penalty because the housings passage is larger and gas speed will be slower through the turbine blades .

If you did things to pull the bottom end torque up like increased CR or better cams or porting etc the loss of low end starts to disapear .

Nissan got around it in one case by using a larger 3L engine and another by having variable cam timing on the R34GTt .

The ability to vary cam timing makes a huge difference because you can alter the valve overlap period throughout the engines rev range . With less overlap at low engine speeds you can drag the dynamic or effective compression ratio up and not have the lack of low speed torque that say the R33 version would have with the larger OP6 turbine housing .

I noticed that people are quoting differences in power output ie the std vs OP6 housing on R33s .

There would be other influences such as more sophisticated engine mamagement and cam profiles etc but from memory an R33 made 184 Kw out of the box where an R34 did 206 Kw ?

I suppose the ~ 20Kw gives a rough idea of what the potential difference would be minus the electronics and cam profile differences .

Thoughts ?

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Pity you couldn't get a better curve with your turbo tune today Daniel :)

I have an OP6 VG30 rear housing just sitting here if you really want it, but I think you might be hunting down somebody else atm :down:

Edited by MacGillaZ

hey mate, nice to meet ya ;) Andrew wasn't it? or have i got that completely wrong? :P sorry, i am shocking with names. Lots of people say that, but i really am stupidly bad with names.

i'll send ya a pm bout the OP6, keeping my options open at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...