Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

according to the turbo builder there is a .56 and .63 rear housing size. i'm trying to determine if i have the .63

if it's the .56 then i guess it's probably not worth the change over, as you've already pointed out. I will however seriously consider the change if i have the .63 or can get a .63

according to the turbo builder there is a .56 and .63 rear housing size. i'm trying to determine if i have the .63

if it's the .56 then i guess it's probably not worth the change over, as you've already pointed out. I will however seriously consider the change if i have the .63 or can get a .63

R33 is smaller = .56 or whatever

R34 is larger = .63 or whatever

OP6 (via search) - has always been .63.

So you know where the base is to work out backwards in this instance that R33 would be smaller than .63... ie .56

true, but i'm getting confused as previous posts indicate the R33 is .48 and the R34 can be EITHER .56 or .63 - Al previously mentioned that the 34 as TWO different rear housings.

mythbusters ahoy

GTR twin turbos are 0.48 a/r rear

so therefore a single GTS turbo would be larger, as its a big single, so 0.56 a/r rear for GTS turbo sounds about right

and 0.63 a/r for the OP6 sounds about right again - OP6 being for VG30 single turbo setup

The turbine housing A/R number is just that - a number .

The important thing is the application of the largest of the three housings (OP6 one) - which was a four cam single turbo VG30DET .

I think the best way to look at them is 2L size , 2.5L size and 3L size .

I'd say if you fitted the OP6 housing to an otherwise std R33 GTS25T you would get a noticable lag penalty because the housings passage is larger and gas speed will be slower through the turbine blades .

If you did things to pull the bottom end torque up like increased CR or better cams or porting etc the loss of low end starts to disapear .

Nissan got around it in one case by using a larger 3L engine and another by having variable cam timing on the R34GTt .

The ability to vary cam timing makes a huge difference because you can alter the valve overlap period throughout the engines rev range . With less overlap at low engine speeds you can drag the dynamic or effective compression ratio up and not have the lack of low speed torque that say the R33 version would have with the larger OP6 turbine housing .

I noticed that people are quoting differences in power output ie the std vs OP6 housing on R33s .

There would be other influences such as more sophisticated engine mamagement and cam profiles etc but from memory an R33 made 184 Kw out of the box where an R34 did 206 Kw ?

I suppose the ~ 20Kw gives a rough idea of what the potential difference would be minus the electronics and cam profile differences .

Thoughts ?

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Pity you couldn't get a better curve with your turbo tune today Daniel :)

I have an OP6 VG30 rear housing just sitting here if you really want it, but I think you might be hunting down somebody else atm :down:

Edited by MacGillaZ

hey mate, nice to meet ya ;) Andrew wasn't it? or have i got that completely wrong? :P sorry, i am shocking with names. Lots of people say that, but i really am stupidly bad with names.

i'll send ya a pm bout the OP6, keeping my options open at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...