Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys and Girls,

This might be a very dum question but how importing is ABS break system on a Track.

Is it an advantage? I know how the ABS breaks work, but I can’t see how it can make much of a advantage on a track.

Thanks guys for your help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/264134-abs-on-the-track/
Share on other sites

I think an intelligent 4 channel abs system is quite good especially on the track, I think most on here would agree,

Flat spotting tyres is never a good thing. However I wasn't particularly impressed with the r32's abs system slow

And not all that clever. So I removed mine to shed some weight out of the front.

But on the Track would you press it so hard that the ABS would kick in. Just asking Because My GTR, The ABS has been removed. (Because onces in its life it had two big high mounted Turbos on it).

Iam going to do track days and just dont no if it worth putting a ABS system back on it.

After seeing pete Walsh from AMEC try another diff in his tt 300zx , on slicks, that did not have the sensor, and with his ABS disconnected, he was having all sorts of strife especially on the downhill into gumtree at Morgan park. The correct diff went back in straight away and no massive wheel lock ups.

It just went to show how modern cars rely so much on this sort of technology, here i am in a 30+ year old car, doing almost same lap times, and with no modern help like abs, it does make an average peddler look good, but when it is done by an OK driver in an old car, right on the limit of lockup into a corner, it is quite an eye-opener.

Yeah I think its a real good thing personally! I remember the electronics on mine failed at Phillip Island once and this was the result.

Having said that I deactivate my ABS for things like motokhana's / skidpans where I think it is a hinderence but on the track it's a god send.

post-5136-1238835676_thumb.jpg

post-5136-1238835691_thumb.jpg

We really the issue is safety. As Noel said, if you leave the track and ABS is connected, the ABS will stop the tyres locking on grass/gravel/kitty litter. Unfortunatetly the only way to get decent braking on a loose surface like them is to lock the wheels. So if you are in a bad situation and leave the track ABS can make it much worse...in fact there was a death in a race at phillip island that may not have occurred if ABS was disconnected.

Since then CAMS has made it legal to disconnect ABS if you want to in any category. And in Europe tracks are moving to tarmac run offs instead of gravel so ABS cars can still stop.

On the other hand, modern, fast acting ABS is a pretty good thing on the track. Like a lot of modern electrics it can make an average driver look pretty good under brakes. You still should brake until before it cuts in for stability, but if you get it wrong braking individual wheels can be really useful like at turn 2 at Oran Park.

Ahh well.....we had a good look into this years ago and gave up. There are a lot of differences.

ABS main unit (of course) 4 channel

ABS computer is in the attessa unit so you have to change that too

ATTESSA pumps are different

Wiring is different.

In the end it would be a total rewire so we gave up.

I think a R32 -> R33 ABS upgrade would be worth it. My R32 with big brakes locks the wheels, R32 just seems to be to slow to pick up diferences in wheel speed. But I think the R33 works reay well (granted it's only 3 channel), but where the R32 will lock up/have big wheel speed diferences, the R33 will pulse for like 1/2 a sec to stop this. I'm not sure if that makes sence, but i know what i mean :devil:

I'm wonding if R32 -> R33 ATTESSA/ABS will be any cheaper/easier than R32 -> R34?

Thanks guys for the info.

I guess i have to find a ABS system now. I just hope there not to dear to Buy. Thinking about upgranding my breaks soon just dont know what to, Need do some reserch.

What you guys recomened iam not looking for a Massive break like a AP Racing.

car for the street and maybe 5 track days a year.

Ben we were looking at 33 but I was sure it was 4 channel, maybe vspec is different? The R32 thing is horribly slow but that is good in a lot of ways, it will never be too obtrusive lol

Michael if the only thing you are missing is the ABS unit they are pretty common, in fact we have 1 or 2 around. But you probably need more like the brake lines as well. You are probably better to just go without unless you are ready for the stuffing around to get it all back in.

Best brakes for street and light track use are standard (maybe new lines and discs, definately with good quality fluid). If you want more than that you would be mad to go past the G4/D2 8 piston calipers and discs.

Definitely think the ABS sytem in the 32 is quite nice in the fact that it is a bit slower than the modern vehicle and in that sense unobtrusive. While the modern ABS systems are very quick and safe on the street, especially in combination with the raft of other vehicle stability systems that are incorporated, they are a bit annoying especially when used on track vehicles that have been upgraded with better pads. Brakes with higher initial bite really require quite a lot of pedal modulation to avoid ABS intrusion.........not really a problem with the R32.

^^ Agreed

My V35, which had Brembo's and upgraded pads, would be engaging ABS at the slightest touch on nearly every corner at Wakie. That being said it did give me extra confidence to brake at the last second.

But now you all have me worried cause my N1 has no ABS :-)

Ben we were looking at 33 but I was sure it was 4 channel, maybe vspec is different? The R32 thing is horribly slow but that is good in a lot of ways, it will never be too obtrusive lol

Michael if the only thing you are missing is the ABS unit they are pretty common, in fact we have 1 or 2 around. But you probably need more like the brake lines as well. You are probably better to just go without unless you are ready for the stuffing around to get it all back in.

Best brakes for street and light track use are standard (maybe new lines and discs, definately with good quality fluid). If you want more than that you would be mad to go past the G4/D2 8 piston calipers and discs.

the big difference is the R32 system runs at 5Hz...the R33 system is 50Hz and the R34 is 100Hz.

this is why the R32 system is a snail...it looks at the wheel speed signal only 5 times a second! The R33 system is 10 times faster to react and the R34 system 20 times faster.

Edited by DiRTgarage
We really the issue is safety. As Noel said, if you leave the track and ABS is connected, the ABS will stop the tyres locking on grass/gravel/kitty litter. Unfortunatetly the only way to get decent braking on a loose surface like them is to lock the wheels. So if you are in a bad situation and leave the track ABS can make it much worse...

word.

Ben we were looking at 33 but I was sure it was 4 channel, maybe vspec is different? The R32 thing is horribly slow but that is good in a lot of ways, it will never be too obtrusive lol

Michael if the only thing you are missing is the ABS unit they are pretty common, in fact we have 1 or 2 around. But you probably need more like the brake lines as well. You are probably better to just go without unless you are ready for the stuffing around to get it all back in.

Best brakes for street and light track use are standard (maybe new lines and discs, definately with good quality fluid). If you want more than that you would be mad to go past the G4/D2 8 piston calipers and discs.

I all ready have slotted rear rotors and cross drilled front rotors, Grex Trust pads. Iam not going to do track days at a competive level. So i guess i might just keep what i have for now.

Cheers, Micahel.

Have driven the exact same R32GTR both with and without ABS my preference is no ABS...sure I could go deeper on some corners with the ABS but the balance/mid corner speed of the car was shot.....maybe I'm a bit old school but I don't like computor stuff trying to help me.

P.S. Would give my left nut for traction control in the wet sometimes though...lol!!!

Edited by Jetwreck

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...