Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've had the GTT for almost a year now and honestly can't remember if it's always been like this or only since suspension update ...

Anyway, few months ago I had the Bilsteins and whiteline bushes from SK's groupbuy installed as well as the 'rear subframe alignment kit'. I'm using factory springs lowered about 2cm on the Bilsteins. Pretty decent directional tyres from Maxxis..

Now the problem I'm having is that the car loses traction extremely easily if there are any sort of bumps in the road ESPECIALLY when going into a corner. So much so that I am now in a habit of turning TCS off whenever I get in the car. But even that doesn't help when I go around a corner (and I'm not talking spirited cornerning, just normal speed) and if there are any bumps, potholes etc in the road the car feels like it's losing power. Almost as if the TCS is kicking in (however its turned off) but not quite as violent. So I lose power as if the one or more wheels aren't making contact with the road

Is this axel tramping or something else and what should I be looking at fixing ? Is it just my stock springs being too soft or something? The ride seems pretty harsh since changing to Bilsteins and lowering it on the stock springs..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265698-r34-traction-issues/
Share on other sites

I had heasman's install the new shocks/bump stops etc and seeing as how they're supposed to be good at this sort of stuff I would've hoped they installed the bumpstops correctly .. is there any way to check without taking the shocks out??

From personal experience those Bilsteins are valved way too hard for standard springs. Better suited to King or other stiffer springs. As most will agree, mismatched suspension parts are just as bad as the original worn out suspension. I have a feeling the springs are allowing the shocks to move too quickly and since the shocks are valved to have more resistance per millimeter travelled with stiffer springs they are resisting the fast movement which comes across as a harsh ride. However, those shocks should easily control those springs and not cause a loss of traction.

This would bring us back to the bump stop issue, ah, wait a minute, you said you lowered the springs two cm's. Ok, so perhaps now with a weak spring that is designed to travel a certain distance is now 20mm shorter and allowing the shocks to bottom out regardless of shortened bump stops.

By the way, I can tell you two of the most important things. Good wheel alignment will transform traction problems. I know because I wasn't too impressed with my shock, spring and bush changes till the alignment was done and it all just started working well. The other is the pinapple installation in the squat position. Car just sits on the road like glue now. 264rwkw's and it just takes off like a scolded cat.

I've had the GTT for almost a year now and honestly can't remember if it's always been like this or only since suspension update ...

Anyway, few months ago I had the Bilsteins and whiteline bushes from SK's groupbuy installed as well as the 'rear subframe alignment kit'. I'm using factory springs lowered about 2cm on the Bilsteins. Pretty decent directional tyres from Maxxis..

snip...

how did you lower the factory springs? did you cut them with a grinder?

with SK's kit, the Bilsteins are supposed to be used with springs that are stiffer than standard. (Whiteline / Eibach)

sounds like mis-matched parts to me

also, if you have lowered the car and have not had a rear camber kit installed, you may have too much rear camber which would add to the problem

camber bushes (whiteline) were installed back and front .. as well as pineapples (aka "subframe alignment kit") The stock springs were NOT cut .. the Bilsteins just has extra circlip grooves cut into them by Heasmans to adjust the height.

Heasman had aligned the wheels as well ... but it was one helluva quick alignment. I might just try get a proper alignment somewhere else. If that still doesn't work, I'll get new springs installed. I've been quoted $750 for new springs supplied and installed .. some aussie brand, not Kings. The place is pretty reliable from what I hear (Eastcoast Suspension) .. or should I stick to Kings?

Edit: oh yeah just remember the brand ..Lovells ? Does that seem like a fair price for supply/install?

Edited by Delta Force

Most springs you have heard of like King or Lovell's or whiteline Eibach, Pedders are all good. I think my King standard lows were 3.5kg rear and 4.5kg front, but thats a R33. I find them a little soft and think the 4.5kg rear and 5.5kg front would be better. So I guess what I'm saying is get the King springs or Lovell's but ask for thei standard low but one kilo heavier. The wife's R34 has Tein super streets and I love them. Wish they fit my car cause she wouldn't know the difference. They are stiffer than the king springs and the shock control is near perfection.

so when you actually get new springs like say the Lovells you can ask for a specific spring rate ?? Or do they come with a predefined spring rate depending whether they're "lows" or "super lows" ?

I'd love to improve the ride quality .. the bilsteins + stock springs = VERY harsh ride and you can feel every bump. So what do you reckon should I be asking in terms of spring rate as I want to lower it another 2cm more than it currently is (its already 2cm lower than stock using the Bilstein circlip grooves)

Just spoke to eastcoast suspension ... he said the Lovells would be about 30% stiffer than stock springs but nowhere near 4.5kg like you mentioned, probably about 3Kg (still waiting for confirmation) and he said the stiffer springs (4.5Kg) would be a different kind (racing spring) but would be a lot costlier as other stuff would need changing too ..

I am getting so confusored now ... what do you reckon is the spring rate on the stockies ?? And would going to these standard Lovells actually improve my ride quality being that they're stiffer springs, keeping in mind I'll go 2cm lower than car is currently.. Thanks

Just heard back from them and they're saying the Lovells springs are 140lbs (2.5Kg/cm) front (??!?!?) and 160lbs (2.8Kg/cm) rear .. I woulda thought fronts would be stiffer but anyway. Does this seem too soft ? Should I go for some other brand springs ?

Edited by Delta Force
Just heard back from them and they're saying the Lovells springs are 140lbs (2.5Kg/cm) front (??!?!?) and 160lbs (2.8Kg/cm) rear .. I woulda thought fronts would be stiffer but anyway. Does this seem too soft ? Should I go for some other brand springs ?

they sound a bit soft to me; sound like standard spring rates.

i have the whiteline spring part numbers from the SK group buy if you want them

Yes Denis those spring rates seem stock to me. However, do the research and find out for yourself. Try Whiteline and Pedders. By the way, Someone like Slide in the sales forum might be able to get some Jap springs designed for your car. My set up I really liked was the King standard lows with KYB Exel-G shocks which are slightly stiffer than standard but much cheaper than Bilsteins. Put these with the whiteline adjustable sway bars front and rear and all the bushes to correct camber and castor, pineapples and diff bushes and you will have a weapon of a car. Put the front bar on the 2nd hole from the end and rear bar same ie: hard setting. Handling is flat as a tack and simply will not lose grip unless you really provoke it.

If you go too low be prepared to get a yellow sticker on your windscreen and besides, too low will not give you a fast road car but a fast track car and the difference would be negligable on the track anyway. The last thing you will want is to hit a large dip in the road half way round a fast corner and end up jumping a meter across the road. THAT's why the RTA and the rest don't allow it, common sense really.

yeah I'll give these Lovells a miss then ..will ask if they can get the whitelines in instead. Thanks guys

Oh and as for lowering ..didn't intend to dump it on its ass .. there's still like a 3cm gap between top of the tyre and the guards so I though another 2cm lower wouldn't look too sus as far as cops go and would look nicer as well

Edited by Delta Force

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...