Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Craig don't you have the Haltech installed? Is it the PS2000?

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

Ahh ok...I think the Etuner's site has your car there listed with haltech....that's why I asked

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

i still cant get over this.. mines still yuck on take off lol..

i wanna see it happen in Video form!

I had the Impul on by itself......I also had just put on the suction pipe and the fabricators had not followed my instructions correctly so I had a slight over boosting problem and as the Impul has no restrictions it helped me to melt a cylinder.

Never had a PS2000 on my car!

Ironpaw where is this Etuners site you speak of....I might have to go and update it a little!huh.gif

.....and if I remember correctly OZ is punching bigger numbers than Japan with the E-manage ultimate with a VQ25det!

You don't remember correctly.

450awps (331awkw) has been done in a street registered NM35 in Japan.

Scott isn't there yet... at least not until the new turbo is installed (if it ever fkn arrives!!).

Having said that, all the "big number" NM35's in Japan have had their capacity increased to over 3L.

Much more impressed with the 2.5L numbers Aus is producing!

i still cant get over this.. mines still yuck on take off lol..

i wanna see it happen in Video form!

I need to find someone stupid enough to sit in the car with me and film:P....where Andy when I need him...lol!....I wont do it again until the shift kit goes in either!.....then I might have to do a quarter run!

Edited by Jetwreck

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

You don't remember correctly.

450awps (331awkw) has been done in a street registered NM35 in Japan.

Scott isn't there yet... at least not until the new turbo is installed (if it ever fkn arrives!!).

Having said that, all the "big number" NM35's in Japan have had their capacity increased to over 3L.

Much more impressed with the 2.5L numbers Aus is producing!

Scott's will smash that on E85......shit I recon I'll get to that with a shift kit and 100 Octane and 20PSI and no F-Con Pro!

Scott's will smash that on E85......shit I recon I'll get to that with a shift kit and 100 Octane and 20PSI and no F-Con Pro!

Take a breath Craig.

That 450awps was on pump... and yes, I know Scott will smash that power level... and yes I know that with the old turbo, his car had very little lag.

Oh, I should mention that particular car wasn't using the Fcon V-Pro... it was using the iS.

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

I ran a cable throttle and still had the same takeoff, the cams go into full retard below 35? Kph to negate the need for traction control and make the car nice and friendly do drive. I will have the stock cam mapping data soon when I install the Vmanage so I will let you know exactly what it does.

Take a breath Craig.

That 450awps was on pump... and yes, I know Scott will smash that power level... and yes I know that with the old turbo, his car had very little lag.

Oh, I should mention that particular car wasn't using the Fcon V-Pro... it was using the iS.

I'm breathing just fine buddy!

Hey did they post up the dyno sheet.....I remember seeing a couple but that was a while ago.......want to compare to Scott's and mine....cannot find in in my J a p browser for some reason!

So what's that advantage of the Fcon units?

Edited by Jetwreck

I ran a cable throttle and still had the same takeoff, the cams go into full retard below 35? Kph to negate the need for traction control and make the car nice and friendly do drive. I will have the stock cam mapping data soon when I install the Vmanage so I will let you know exactly what it does.

DO WANT THIS!!!

hurry up!!! before my reno funds dry up!! :ninja:

No dyno sheet unfortunately.

Both F-con's intercept the signal from the ECU to the engine and modify it as per the tune, but they are quite different.

Fcon iS is pretty much an eManage Ultimate + Vmanage, but with a Video output... and it looks pretty (not that you'd see it :P).

That being that it add's/subtracts to the OEM ECU's signals (timing, fuel etc etc).

The problem with this is that the stock ECU is damn clever and will react to the return signal accordingly.

(ie Ecu sends signal to engine, iS intercepts signal and adds a fixed number of degrees to the timing, signal returns from engine to stock ECU, ECU takes additional timing out to bring it in line with what the stock levels "should" be, iS intercepts and adds it's fixed number again - which is now less due to the reduction in timing in the "send" signal from the ECU).

I guess the trick here is to tune outside of the stock ECU's limits :)

Fcon V-Pro intercepts the OEM ECU signal and completely replaces the them with the "tuned" information, so regardless of what the stock ECU receives and adjusts for in the return signal, the V-Pro dictates the parameters in it's "base" tune to the Engine.

Edited by iamhe77

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

I think it is 79%. If no one else weighs in to say differently l can plug it in & do a test. I do know that I can't get above 87%, ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
    • Well the articals keep saying a Q50s (Skyline in Japan) with a new Manual gearbox. I like the talk about the new looks with the round tail lights. I hope they bring back the retro look like they did with the Z
×
×
  • Create New...