Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks dude. much appreciated. in the end i have researched my butt off to make sure im doing the right thing! and i know i am...sure its 30k but i know its gonna be worth it in the end lol :P im happy with my decision.

Well, stroking a 2.5 to a 2.7 is going to adversely effect you compression ratio and make the engine more prone to detonation, you need to shift a huge amount of air for 500kw, the two of these add up to disaster. But I think the sc and engine will run out of huff long before then.

Demotivation09.jpg

Edited by The Mundi
  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lolz na man she wants to do something unique like blow her car; thats different!

jokes aside, i like the charged route...check out the s15 twincharged which is really cool (i know its turbocharged too) but in the US they are selling quite a few supercharger kits for bmw 3 series with great results! aim for a reasonable amount of power like 400ish hp from an efficient supercharger and you can have a torque monster

The bmw kit is stealth; anodised black it just blends in with the engine covers so it can be made 'stealthy' im a big fan

Well now that I've read this from start to finish I'll comment:

To ahjosh - your a knob.

To the 34 girl - I think you may need to rethink the numbers, I know you say you have done "alot" of research and Im not doubting that. What I am doubting is the ability of a stroked 2.5L engine being able to produce 750Hp with a supercharger.

Regardless of what you do during this rebuild it simply won't flow enough - and if it does it will last all of about 1 day running 40 psi.

I don't mean any disrespect, but have you seen anyone get near these results with an RB25? or RB27? Best I've heard of is about ~200kw

At the end of the day - your car and your money so do what you want. But when its done don't expect people not to say "I told you so"

My 2 cents

Well now that I've read this from start to finish I'll comment:

To ahjosh - your a knob.

To the 34 girl - I think you may need to rethink the numbers, I know you say you have done "alot" of research and Im not doubting that. What I am doubting is the ability of a stroked 2.5L engine being able to produce 750Hp with a supercharger.

Regardless of what you do during this rebuild it simply won't flow enough - and if it does it will last all of about 1 day running 40 psi.

I don't mean any disrespect, but have you seen anyone get near these results with an RB25? or RB27? Best I've heard of is about ~200kw

At the end of the day - your car and your money so do what you want. But when its done don't expect people not to say "I told you so"

My 2 cents

totally agree with u on the fact tht ahjosh is a knob and the chick... but u can take a rb25 is capable of just more than ~200kw. im currently puttin gout 250rwkw....

but yea... 500kw even after increasing to 2.7L is just a joke.

totally agree with u on the fact tht ahjosh is a knob and the chick... but u can take a rb25 is capable of just more than ~200kw. im currently puttin gout 250rwkw....

but yea... 500kw even after increasing to 2.7L is just a joke.

he's referring to using a supercharger...

RB25's can make a shedload more than 200rwkw - has been proven many times, just not with superchargers...

there's a difference in the exponential power that a turbo makes and the linear power that a supercharger works. Also due to the supercharger's direct attachment to the engine (wheras a turbo works independently off the exhaust) there's a loss incurred. So just because a turbo can let an RB25 make more than 200 easily, doesn't mean a supercharger's gonna be just as easy.

just regarding the rb motor..i can't double check, but isn't there a few 1000hp skylines? what engines were they using? probably would be helpful looking up what exactly they did

Getting the horsepower from a supercharger isn't the problem. Getting the horsepower from a low compression engine to turn the supercharger to begin with will be a problem.

Maybe I should get all of my engineering/car manual stuff out and write up a FAQ on superchargers. It sure would stop a lot of speculation... Hell I'm going to do it.

EDIT: Oh and superchargers don't neccessarily make linear power gains. Centrifugal superchargers have a somewhat similar power curve to a turbo due to their design. Hell don't worry I'll write this FAQ up and be done with it.

Edited by R33_Dude

It's not hard to tell that no-one has done any real research into it.... 2 seconds of RB supercharger kit found one to suit an RB30 off the shelf.

Castlemain Rod shop do a SC14 kit for an RB30. I'm sure you could use that kit and modify the outlet pipe to suit the NEO. As for wasting cash, a complete kit cost $2400. Easy.

Here's the link

So now go do it.

Ok so lets just say that "hyperthiticly" I'm considering supercharging my r34 skyline as im on my p's,will a sc14 supercharger make enough difference to bother with and would it be hard to hide,I'd plan on setting up a hiden on/off button so i can use it when im on the track and then turn it of for daily driving :)

What will i need? other then the supercharger and do i need to add anything,would i be able to do it myself without any hasel's?

Stick to NA on Ps and turbos on full licence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...