Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's 5 minutes between PMs, and is currently being trialled as a solution. I might knock it down to 3 after the bot plague has settled down a bit more. But for now I'm gonna keep it at 5 mins as we're still getting signups from uncommon IP's which then don't become active on the forum.

just bear with it for a while.

You've got it half right...

But see one of the many threads on it (funnily enough, a few threads below this one!)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Sp...re-t265283.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ba...kz-t264737.html

:cool:

now that people are spamming to get up the 10 posts needed to pm I have a new policy. Anyone caught spamming to get up their 10 posts gets their post count reset to 0 and a suspension with warning note. or we can just flat out ban them. but surely some people will be actual genuine members who are just impatient. so we can do reset to 0, suspension/warning, and then if they do it a second time - ban.

I've been watching those spamming - seems many are dodgy - its actually exposed thing even better

I've banned a few accounts because of useless spam attempts that clearly offer nothing.

I say we make it 100 posts and limit it to certain areas!

I've been watching those spamming - seems many are dodgy - its actually exposed thing even better

I've banned a few accounts because of useless spam attempts that clearly offer nothing.

I say we make it 100 posts and limit it to certain areas!

great idea 10 is a little too low, and someone who has just joined the site and community really doesn't need to PM people as they wouldn't know anyone

since there are admins in this thread i will ask my 2nd question here, rather than start a new thread >_<

2) have adding trader comments been disabled for a bit or just mine, can a Admin please look into it, thank you

I could make it so if your post count is over 100 then it drops the time limit. If you haven't been caught out by 100 posts then I'm fairly confident that you're a regular.

  • 9 months later...
I could make it so if your post count is over 100 then it drops the time limit. If you haven't been caught out by 100 posts then I'm fairly confident that you're a regular.

can you at least set it up so if you have over 100 posts its only 30 seconds or a minute to send another PM.... not the 4-5 minutes it is now :laugh: 

  • 5 weeks later...

Hey

Any chance some of the members that have been here a while (ie. me :P ) could get this PM thing dropped? I'm PMing every one in the group buy at the moment for details and the 5 minute thing is killing me :(

Does making a donation get rid of it?

Edited by PM-R33
  • 1 month later...

Is there a way to drop this delay for paying Traders such as myself who have also been on the forum for a while now?

Running a business, i dont get alot of time to check the forum, and when i do, i can get the other forums all replied within 10 minutes, meanwhile i have to wait 5 minutes for each pm i send which is impossible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...