Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine supposedly has 270bhp at the wheels. Jacky's S15 290bhp at the wheels. My horses sound lazy compared to his. lol But his times make my head hurt. I've been to EC so I know how fast 1:45 is! And that's on Federal RSRs! unbelieveable

Might be worthwhile doing a wheel/tyre swap for a session? He's punting his this around very quickly! Callum's is pretty close to yours on "spec" isn't it Harry?

he's 4 stud, so we can't swap rubber. I have been offered me a try before you buy deal though :ermm:

His is also stripped out, some basic aero - wing and undertray/splitter. It went a sec faster from them alone. Lower diff ratio (like I had in the old car) and a mech diff. I have none of those things.

I ran one day in a Scirroco at Nurburgring with some Bridgestone street tyre, then the next day on those Federal 595 RS-R, they are a very good tyre. I dont think they give away much at all to an RE55, which appear to be showing their age compared to the newer A050.

But, the RS-R was an amazing thing...its is a true semi... so that experience combined with the times at EC and Wakefield of the E85 sniffing S15...then they are on par with RE55s in my eyes. At least close enough that it would be interesting to back to back them as the differences are not obvious

I ran one day in a Scirroco at Nurburgring with some Bridgestone street tyre, then the next day on those Federal 595 RS-R, they are a very good tyre. I dont think they give away much at all to an RE55, which appear to be showing their age compared to the newer A050.

But, the RS-R was an amazing thing...its is a true semi... so that experience combined with the times at EC and Wakefield of the E85 sniffing S15...then they are on par with RE55s in my eyes. At least close enough that it would be interesting to back to back them as the differences are not obvious

The new Federal semi FZ-201 in medium compound is about 1.5 sec faster than RS-R's :ermm:

I ran one day in a Scirroco at Nurburgring with some Bridgestone street tyre, then the next day on those Federal 595 RS-R, they are a very good tyre. I dont think they give away much at all to an RE55, which appear to be showing their age compared to the newer A050.

But, the RS-R was an amazing thing...its is a true semi... so that experience combined with the times at EC and Wakefield of the E85 sniffing S15...then they are on par with RE55s in my eyes. At least close enough that it would be interesting to back to back them as the differences are not obvious

With a hardness rating of 140 it falls short of some of the true semi's Roy.

It is the best all round (street/track) tyre I have ever used but it is at least 1 & 1/2 seconds slower than the direzza,s I replaced them with.

So the new Federal semi is widely available now?

I was enquiring about them a few months back and they were nowhere to be found.

no. 255 x 17 is still the biggest they are importing atm.

They only have a couple or so of sizes available.

With a hardness rating of 140 it falls short of some of the true semi's Roy.

It is the best all round (street/track) tyre I have ever used but it is at least 1 & 1/2 seconds slower than the direzza,s I replaced them with.

140, 50 or 230....dont care. They are a good tyre and only a guide. There is more to grip then a number or how soft they are. They work well. And if you have used them back to back with RE55s and they are 1.5seconds slower then i fair enough. But i would be surprised if that was the case

140, 50 or 230....dont care. They are a good tyre and only a guide. There is more to grip then a number or how soft they are. They work well. And if you have used them back to back with RE55s and they are 1.5seconds slower then i fair enough. But i would be surprised if that was the case

Not arguing as to wether they are good or not Roy. A great tyre. My quoted times were actual time differences I ran from one track day to the next.

The rsr's were amazing compared to the street rubber i used prior but the dunlops semi's took grip to a whole nutha level.

140, 50 or 230....dont care. They are a good tyre and only a guide. There is more to grip then a number or how soft they are. They work well. And if you have used them back to back with RE55s and they are 1.5seconds slower then i fair enough. But i would be surprised if that was the case

I almost have, i used to have 595 rs's on the skyline for street tyres and re55's for track. There was a couple of seconds in it around wakefield on the same day. Don't know that there is a significant difference between the old rs and the new rsr.

I almost have, i used to have 595 rs's on the skyline for street tyres and re55's for track. There was a couple of seconds in it around wakefield on the same day. Don't know that there is a significant difference between the old rs and the new rsr.

Buger all that I could tell Dave, Maybe a 10th or so at best.

Have a hard think... the only difference was tyres? If so then I seems i am selling the RE55s short :) That is dramatic and i wouldnt have thought it would be that dramatic. But a back to back is more accurate then my seat of pants! They were the 595RSR, not the 595, or the 595 EVO etc etc (just checking)

http://www.federaltyres.com.au/ss595

Edited by Roy
Have a hard think... the only difference was tyres? If so then I seems i am selling the RE55s short :) That is dramatic and i wouldnt have thought it would be that dramatic. But a back to back is more accurate then my seat of pants! They were the 595RSR, not the 595, or the 595 EVO etc etc (just checking)

http://www.federaltyres.com.au/ss595

Definitely the RSR Roy, I have been a big fan of them as a street/track combo tyre for a long time but as a track only tyre they fall short of the dedicated semi's.

Probably the reason why federal are in the process of introducing the new semi as used by callum earlier in this thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...