Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how much do both of these manifolds retail for ?

both are around the $1100 mark for a standard T3 flanged manifold.

an advantage the ETM product has over the 6boost is that they are laser cut to suit both RB25 and RB26 stud pattern. which is handy if you wish to sell the setup later on.

Edited by TiTAN
  • 11 months later...

I can't complain with my ETM set up only issue is it has a major boost spike. Goes from 15 to 24psi. Mine is plumbed off the housing not the manifold and the only thing anyone can tell me is that its where the gate hase been plumbed in

It will be coming off soon to go back and run a conventional off the manifold set up

post-39081-1288146406_thumb.jpg

post-39081-1288146464_thumb.jpg

post-39081-1288146524_thumb.jpg

post-39081-1288146563_thumb.jpg

post-39081-1288146606_thumb.jpg

Its a tial 44mm and it was screamer and we dropped the screamer pipe off the gate completely to see if it was a restriction but it wasn't. Tried a Turbosmart 45mm gate with the same result. had the turbo inspected and all is well. Plumbed in new vac feed with larger vac line and still no boost control

Weapon, even if you change to a conventional style manifold setup you may still suffer from the same issue. Get whoever welded the wastegate outlet on to redo it properly. It looks to be coming off at 90 degrees to direction of flow.

Should be shaped more around towards the rocker cover so the exiting hole nearly lines up with the exhaust flow into the exhaust housing. As much as clearance will allow.

Like this...

post-12828-1288161635_thumb.jpg

Yea i know :P i was getting told that until the guy tuning my car showed me 3 other GTR's in the shop that had just been tuned. 2 with T04z's and a then one with a GT3582 same as mine running 6 boost mani's with the gate off the manifold. All running tial 44's and the boost line on those were almost flat

  • Like 1

funny enough this is only going off my setup

i run a 50mm external gate setup from my gt3582r

i use to run a vacum line from the copy greddy inlet manifold, i then decided i wanted to shorten that vacum line and pickup vacum from the cooler pipe that comes off my comp housing so i got a nipple welded on, hooked up vacum so the line was now bout 25cms long instead of a mtr.. what do u know all i got was big boost creep upwards to 1.6-7bar.. put it back to inlet manifold vacum and havent had a problem since.. could be worth trying neway..

Ive got the same manifold with a 3582, with the gate off the collector but using a 48mm progate, no issues here. Plumbed back in next to the gearbox too.

Its getting boost pressure from the pipework just after the compressor.

  • 7 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...