Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have finally managed to track one of these real Gt3076R's down 700382-12 or 700382-5012

For peoples reference

GCG $2195 available around the 9th June

MTQ qld $2066 available around August

Slide $1775 in stock but is not the anti surge compressor inlet. (Not the real gt3076)

Capa $1375 with no rear housing. No stock.

Rear IW .82 housing ATP delivered $620 or Garret Aust for $680-780

Another Brisbane supplier who I have order thru. Getting assemble tomorrow $1800

Once they have supplied me the correct turbo I will let you know who they are.

They have great pricing online compared to others.

All plus actuator and bracket $150-180.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How confusing.

Is it worth kicking up a stink for the correct spec 3076 with port shrouded cover? Or not worth my trouble?

Check out ATPturbo.com home page , scroll right down and look at the GT3076R-WG

0.70 comp 52 Trim 0.86 rear

You may have this configuration, sounds like a pretty damn good street turbo. Quick spool 500 hp .

Check out ATPturbo.com home page , scroll right down and look at the GT3076R-WG

0.70 comp 52 Trim 0.86 rear

You may have this configuration, sounds like a pretty damn good street turbo. Quick spool 500 hp .

That one looks like it has the T2 rear.

fkn confusing shit!

That looks like it though, except I don't have that rear housing...

GT3076R-WG_top.jpg

I have this rear housing

internally_wastegated.jpg

It seems to me the only differences are the 7 T04S blades instead of the 6, and no ported front...

Also, ID tag says 700177-5018

And a simple Google search of "Garrett 700177-5018" lead to this link http://www.turbofast.com.au/GTseries.html which indicates it is a GT30 family turbocharger that uses a TO4S compressor (7 blades). That makes it a GT3076R

There's really no science to those searches and you'd have found out long ago what your specs actually are.

All that aside, do you actually have it fitted and running, and if so what do you think about it? Those specs support same/similar flow capacity as the 6 bladed GT3037R so I'm interested to hear how it goes in service.

Hi people. Just a question to all you guys that have done this upgrade. What is generally used on the intake side of things as far as connecting the standard pipe to the turbo. Is some sort of fabrication required or is there an actual correct size intake pipe that can be purchased. Im asking because i've generally not seen it mentioned when people post about these upgrades. All the people i've asked dont know? If there is a correct pipe for this application where should i purchase from and rough estimations on price would be very helpful. Thank's guy's ;)

Regardless of what specs state the T04S 7 blade GT3076r is a crappy thing. The -12 is what you want; if you can't then its either the 3071r or the 3082r.

The GT3071's tend to make power easier than them. :S

Edited by SLAPS
And a simple Google search of "Garrett 700177-5018" lead to this link http://www.turbofast.com.au/GTseries.html which indicates it is a GT30 family turbocharger that uses a TO4S compressor (7 blades). That makes it a GT3076R

There's really no science to those searches and you'd have found out long ago what your specs actually are.

All that aside, do you actually have it fitted and running, and if so what do you think about it? Those specs support same/similar flow capacity as the 6 bladed GT3037R so I'm interested to hear how it goes in service.

Yeah me too Doof..

It seems, within the posts, heaps of blokes didn't and still don't even know if they have the TO4S Comp cover and 7 blade wheel instead of the genuine Garrett GT3076R.

Hey, if it's a good package, then tell us.

Please , post your results ASAP, we gotta keep this thread alive, and kicking.

If you ask me, spending $2K plus on a turbo, and getting something else, it's a blatent rip off.

Imagine if you walked into Hugo Boss for a leather jacket and found out it was made in Bali.

Same thing here man.

  • 1 month later...

This is a good example of why Garrets and HKS's turbo description systems fall down , the figures given are not always exacting probably in the interests of simplicity .

Specific to the GT3037 and GT3076R turbo group .

Firstly to HKS , in long figure form it probably should have been called GT30GT37 because what they mean is a GT30 turbine with a GT37 compressor , the only real differences in the HKS marketed GT3037's is the compressor trim and since they are all GT37 compressors the same handle applies .

The Garrett system is slightly different because their terminology - GT3076R - means GT30 turbine with 76mm OD compressor .

If all they used was "76"mm OD GT37 compressor wheels there wouldn't be a problem but they don't do they ...

For reasons known best to themselves they market "GT3076R's" with an earlier tech T series compressor - the one with the higher blade count ie 7/7 rather than 6/6 . Full height blades/splitter blades .

What it comes down to in the end is the part numbers on the turbos ID tag . Mostly but not always they have a cartridge or CHRA number and for a GT30 turbine based ball bearing one it will be 700177 series . The prefix or dash (- xxxx) after the 700177 tells you precisely the compressor wheel options and any mods to the turbine itself ie cropping or grinding down from 60mm to 56.6 .

700177-7 or -5007 is the CHRA number for the real or all GT wheel spec GT3037/GT3076R in 56 comp trim .

Basically if it doesn't say -5 or -6 or -7 (5005 5006 5007) it hasn't got the GT37 compressor on it .

If you wants what I call the real GT3037 or GT3076R then it has to have a GT series compressor to be a matching set with the GT series turbine .

I look at it like this , GT compressor for GT turbine and T series compressor for T series turbine . Left shoe for left foot and so on .

At the end of the day the only thing that's significantly different between a GT3037S 56T and a real GT3076R is the turbine housing , a HKS one on the 3037 and a Garrett one on the 3076R .

True the HKS has the bell mouthed insert in the comp cover but I think that's of little consequence unless you are running these turbos to the absolute limit and getting every last 1% out of them - with the largest proper respective turbine housing available .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...