Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With all the basics... im doing 230-240kws..... Heres my list...

*Greddy Power Extreme II Exhaust system 3inch

with a CATCO 3inch(bashed cat) Highflow cat,Greddy

Trust Front pipe 3inch,turbodump pipe some cheap brand.

*Blitz LM intercooler

*Apexi Pod Filter

*Greddy Profec Spec-B II boost controller

*Splitfire coil packs with 0.8mm BCP7ES

*Walbro fuel pump 255l Gss-342

*My stock r33 S2 Turbo highflowed by

hypergear with (ATR28 450HP CHAR using Garrett Bearings seals and collars

with ATR's 360" multiport thrust) 71mm compressor

*Apexi Power FC

*AFM z32

*740CC injectors

*Coilovers are TIEN HA's - hieght and damper adjustable

*Rear Sway Bar whiteline adjustable

*5 Puk Button Clutch

Air & Fuel

1. you wont crack that sort of power on the standard turbo

2. injectors will be at maxing point

you say basic mods, i'm guessing Exhaust, higher flowing air filter and a FMIC. 160-180rwkw's seems to pull most cars up running the standard ECU.

even with after market ECU 190-200 is max

Edited by Mr. Untouchable
just buy a gtr and you'll find that power very easily, then you can start the hunt for even more :P

Or a 2JZ or even a gen3 for that matter but thats not what hes asking. RB25's respond well to a decent turbo and supporting mods 225 rwkw is a walk in the park.

GT30 sized turbo and supporting mods should see 225 quite easily with potential for 270-300 if pushed to its potential on 98.

  • 3 weeks later...
i got 198.9 Kw ATW(r33 S2)

r34 SMIC

Stock Turbo

Remapped ECU by Toshi

3 inch enhaust with split front/dump pipe

12psi

Running very rich probably could squeeze more

I wouldn't believe your car is running rich. 200rwkWs from a stock turbo is a very good tune, doubt you can get more power :)

By checking the RB25 dyno thread and seeing what other people have done

And that pretty much answers the question.

meet07 - please read the sticky thread.

People post their power, dyno sheets and their mods... its really basic to workout what you need

Thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...