Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With all the basics... im doing 230-240kws..... Heres my list...

*Greddy Power Extreme II Exhaust system 3inch

with a CATCO 3inch(bashed cat) Highflow cat,Greddy

Trust Front pipe 3inch,turbodump pipe some cheap brand.

*Blitz LM intercooler

*Apexi Pod Filter

*Greddy Profec Spec-B II boost controller

*Splitfire coil packs with 0.8mm BCP7ES

*Walbro fuel pump 255l Gss-342

*My stock r33 S2 Turbo highflowed by

hypergear with (ATR28 450HP CHAR using Garrett Bearings seals and collars

with ATR's 360" multiport thrust) 71mm compressor

*Apexi Power FC

*AFM z32

*740CC injectors

*Coilovers are TIEN HA's - hieght and damper adjustable

*Rear Sway Bar whiteline adjustable

*5 Puk Button Clutch

Air & Fuel

1. you wont crack that sort of power on the standard turbo

2. injectors will be at maxing point

you say basic mods, i'm guessing Exhaust, higher flowing air filter and a FMIC. 160-180rwkw's seems to pull most cars up running the standard ECU.

even with after market ECU 190-200 is max

Edited by Mr. Untouchable
just buy a gtr and you'll find that power very easily, then you can start the hunt for even more :P

Or a 2JZ or even a gen3 for that matter but thats not what hes asking. RB25's respond well to a decent turbo and supporting mods 225 rwkw is a walk in the park.

GT30 sized turbo and supporting mods should see 225 quite easily with potential for 270-300 if pushed to its potential on 98.

  • 3 weeks later...
i got 198.9 Kw ATW(r33 S2)

r34 SMIC

Stock Turbo

Remapped ECU by Toshi

3 inch enhaust with split front/dump pipe

12psi

Running very rich probably could squeeze more

I wouldn't believe your car is running rich. 200rwkWs from a stock turbo is a very good tune, doubt you can get more power :)

By checking the RB25 dyno thread and seeing what other people have done

And that pretty much answers the question.

meet07 - please read the sticky thread.

People post their power, dyno sheets and their mods... its really basic to workout what you need

Thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...