Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No not your motor's dyno graph Paul, just cam duration change to Marko's one :cool:

lol...interesting comparison though...just shows a basic 26...is just as good as a big $$ 30...and makes earlier torque but doesn't hold on as long. The graphs are very similar with Marko's pipping mine by 0.1KW

I thought you may have been hinting at your engine...don't you run smaller cams Steve ?

Edited by DiRTgarage
  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats right, I used 270IN and EX with 10.25mm for the current one. But the cams were never dialled in during the tune as we were pressed for time, that aside it would be great if someone could overlay Marko's graph and this graph;

Note this is using the same size turbos (im pretty sure marko has the .6 -10's meaning 400hp each, im on HKSGTRS's) and my head is only cleaned up, its not "ported"

Down low its pretty much the same, but look at the midrange and up top, also lower boost

n719527336_2011094_7180963.jpg

stevo, if i switched them there is labour + another tune = $

your above graph is based on a 2 wheel dyno whereas mine is a 4 wheel dyno which may also change the results (i.e. jim @ crd advised my power level on 2 wheels on his dyno is 445rwkw)

the bigger the better with rb30's as i was informed!

to be fair yours still has a little way to go though Marko and i was running more boost (27psi)...why do you think im building one.

can't wait to see what it does with my head, turbo and plenunm on one drinking methanol at 35psi. :P

a direct comparison between my current bottom end and the 30 after running mine in with pump shall be interesting...my turbo should really come into its own. I feel that 30 bottom ends do have their application, but im far from convinced they are the be all and end all.

i spent over 20k building my engine BUT i sold off all of my other bits from the rb26, end of the day the whole thing cost me approx 13k (includes tuning cost @ $1500)

best 13k ive spent to date :P

As Bakes says...if it makes you happy its a bargain.

how much do you get back from Wayne Swan for the engine ?

Edited by DiRTgarage

no need. :) you can see if it peaks at 8500 that each line is 3,4,5,6,7,8000rpm. :ninja:

it's interesting that my 26 with headwork, small cams and GT-SS made 160kw @ 4,000 vs 150kw on the 30 with GTRS, and at 4,400rpm mine was 210kw vs 180kw for your 30. at 5,000rpm i'm making 250kw and you have 230kw. at 5,600 I have 275kw and you are now just overtaking me with 290kw (also getting very near your peak torque). and then at 6,000rpm I have just 290kw you have 330kw and from 6,000rpm to 8,000rpm you run away with the bigger turbos and make another 100kw.

it's interesting though that the 3 litre doesn't make the GT-RS turbos as responsive as people make out. there is still a lag price to pay when you see that a little ol 2.6 with the baby GT-SS are about even with it up to 6,000rpm. having said that mine was only running about 17 or 18psi at the time as I was being a bit conservative, it's now running 23psi in the hands of it's new owner and I think with that more boost, and it coming on sooner it would give the RB30/GT-RS combo a good fight up to 6,000rpm and would probably feel more responsive/torqueier down low on the street. the top end power can't be denied though!!! and when it comes down to it they are two different dynos so it's hard to really get any truth from it, but it is still interesting. I've no doubt though on the whole the 30/RS combo is faster. but i'm not 100% sure which would be the better street car/hills thrasher... ?

no need. :ninja: you can see if it peaks at 8500 that each line is 3,4,5,6,7,8000rpm. :ninja:

Well see that's i would think myself at first glance... However i don't want to assume just yet because as it was asked earlier...

Have I got it right, max torque is around 4,250 rpm and max horsepower is around 6,100 rpm and it makes less than 50 rwkw at 3,000 rpm? Or is my maths totally screwed up?

So 3 of us are thinking that is how the axis is, so indeed only making 50rwkw @ 3,000rpm (by what we think)

However Marko then came along and said...

your calculations are not right, would be if it was a rgv250

Which basically says none of us are correct in our assumption of the bottom axis

So that would almost certainly mean its not the scale we are thinking :ninja:

Hence I'm trying to find out by actually getting the bottom axis to be sure :)

i'll post another graph tonight from my other pc which includes the km/h axis (it is from 0-200km/h)

i had an rb26 with gtss's & i can tell you that the difference in torque is massive between the rb26/gtss v's rb30/-10s :)

chalk & cheese

well he himself said it was revv'd to 8,5000 not 9,000rpm. so assuming he's telling the truth then peak TORQUE is about 6,500rpm and peak power is about 8,000rpm and held to the 8,500rpm limit. not sure where gary got the 4,250rpm for peak torque if it's being revv'd to 8,500rpm?!

this well considering i pulled an 11.1 @ 129mph with my rb26/gtss setup which had 312awkw...this setup will smash a 10!

agree with that, but not all RB26/GT-SS set-ups are the same.... :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...