Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im with you on this one :happy:

or one of these would be nice

B-E-A-utiful :mad:

Also was that an auto gear box being used? So even I can drive it with only a C-A license :D

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why draw the line at only V8's vs turbo cars ? Why not include V12's , rotaries, Diesels....Hell why not include a Jet engine as well........Really mate what is the point of this thread ?

its just like arguing Religion or Politics

There is no right or wrong - only personal preference

what about vtec motors?

Both types of engine have aspects that shit me, but I think a V8 turbo would be my choice something torquey to kick in before the boost through the top end :happy:

This is why the Typoons are good cars, torquey large capacity 6 + turbo

yeah for sure Dan mad combo

oh yeah, and fark that v8/turbo debate poo, honestly i've heard this argument so many times its annoying. both applications are effective in what they do.

ok dude ino that's been done to death but the main debate was that my cousin was sayin that turbo's have/make fake power compared to a v8, wats ur reply to that? is there any truth behind this?

tell your cousin he's talking out of his ass, wtf does fake power mean??

whats he trying to say? 300rwkw out of a turbo motor is fake compared to 300rwkw out of a NA v8??? dyno's dont lie, 300rwkw is 300rwkw.

he probably thinks just because a v8 sounds like its "making a whole" 300rwkw then a "hissing" jap motor mustn't be because it doesnt sound like it is.

mate all i can put it down too is ignorance of your cousin, he's one sided, always will be, because he's never known any better

be the better man and say to him "yeah v8's are decent" (coz they are) "but jap engines are also good and thats what floats my boat"

in my opinion im glad he's into 8's, one less dickhead to give us a bad name. lol (in all respect)

tell your cousin he's talking out of his ass, wtf does fake power mean??

whats he trying to say? 300rwkw out of a turbo motor is fake compared to 300rwkw out of a NA v8??? dyno's dont lie, 300rwkw is 300rwkw.

he probably thinks just because a v8 sounds like its "making a whole" 300rwkw then a "hissing" jap motor mustn't be because it doesnt sound like it is.

mate all i can put it down too is ignorance of your cousin, he's one sided, always will be, because he's never known any better

be the better man and say to him "yeah v8's are decent" (coz they are) "but jap engines are also good and thats what floats my boat"

in my opinion im glad he's into 8's, one less dickhead to give us a bad name. lol (in all respect)

couldnt have said it better if i said it myself.

man i cant stand these debates, and wat i even hate more is the arrogance and ignorance of the common V8 driver.

i like V8s aswell but id take an SR or RB anyday, shit id even consider a CA ova a V8 these days LOL

Morpheus: what is real? how do you define real?

Neo: A v8 is real, ill take the blue pill

Anyways, this fake debate; what about breast implants? they are real.....well technically they take up space and time, they feel great n look great and if they fell down in a forest they's make a sound lolz.

Weird comment from me, well so is the whole v8/turbo real/fake power lolz.

Is there actually any power serious benifit from arrangement of cylinders? I mean, is a 4L V8 magically going to make more power than a 4L v6?

The v8 should theoretically rev better due to smaller/lighter reciprocating components.

tell your cousin he's talking out of his ass, wtf does fake power mean??

whats he trying to say? 300rwkw out of a turbo motor is fake compared to 300rwkw out of a NA v8??? dyno's dont lie, 300rwkw is 300rwkw.

he probably thinks just because a v8 sounds like its "making a whole" 300rwkw then a "hissing" jap motor mustn't be because it doesnt sound like it is.

mate all i can put it down too is ignorance of your cousin, he's one sided, always will be, because he's never known any better

be the better man and say to him "yeah v8's are decent" (coz they are) "but jap engines are also good and thats what floats my boat"

in my opinion im glad he's into 8's, one less dickhead to give us a bad name. lol (in all respect)

Yeah well he use to have a vlt back in the day, I love both v8's and turbo's at the start I hated turbo's but in time they grew on me and now I couldn't live without 1 lol, spose his point is with a turbo it's fake cos u got a turbo bolted on where with an 8 it's pure power and hp, doesn't realise how tuff the jap cars are anyway i'm over it lol long live the nissans :down: especially skylines!!

I think you should both check out ;

www.realultimatepower.net

The only true power is NINJA . everything else is fake.

This thread is sooo cool I saw a ninja totally flip out and kill twenty moderators !!!

I feel like my brain capacity and IQ has just increased by 200% by reading this thread. I have never been so enlightened by internet wisdom before.

couldnt have said it better if i said it myself.

man i cant stand these debates, and wat i even hate more is the arrogance and ignorance of the common V8 driver.

i like V8s aswell but id take an SR or RB anyday, shit id even consider a CA ova a V8 these days LOL

Let's not forget the ignorance/arrogance of the common turbo driver...both sides have their f***ing morons who seem to think that their particular application is better than the other.

eh this debate will go on forever....

V8s are cool, I like turbo's just cause i like the feeling of hitting boost and I've always had an RB and just enjoy the way the whole setup of them is.

Theres those on both sides that will sit there and go 'this is better then that' but nether are better. you have to go to an individual engine setup. E.G. My engine setup vs a VL 5 litre holden motor.... mine is probably better yes. My engine vs a lamborghini V8, probably not better

The only way to say which is better is to put them to the test but like i said you cant group all V8s vs all Turbos. If you know wat i mean...

Can't even make that comparison 89CAL, not without specifying the variables that determine "better". Are we talking fuel economy or power or torque or what? Are the engines stock or modified? You need to be very, very specific when comparing engines - pretty much to the point where there's no point comparing them because it will come down to one being more suitable for the purpose it was designed for. This is where things get tricky and threads like this are just one great big moot point.

Better power doesn't mean a faster car, it all depends on the weight. Heck, i imagine the engies out of some of those huge luxury sedans are pretty dam beefy, but the car itself might not be fast around a track.

this thread is the reason why I don't even waste my breath trying to talk to either bogans or one eyed import lovers about cars.

ps rev[200] your links aren't funny, ninjas and maddox are f**king gay like chuck norris jokes, welcome to faggotry from 5 years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...