Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

One for the admins,

why is it that the same people can post absolute crap in this thread yet nothing gets done ?

i thought there was a section made for these types of rubbish comments that seem to be common amongst the same users.

Agree. Move thread to Wasteland?

look out, its the same troll back again trying to troll the trolls.

Troll elsewhere kta

:D

lol you're just pissy that SK keeps rolling you Marc, awesome thread would read again! (now for someone to link this thread to a rotor forum ha ha ha)

lol interesting reading apart from the tl;dr posts about physics etc. Most of the rotor forum invaders have done nothing to help their cause, they are nearly as bad as the muzza's from Calais Turbo lol.

IMO rotaries suck pure and simply because they are impractical as a street car or a daily in any form. That and the insane fuel consumption.

just FYI fuel consumption above 15L/100km is shithouse.

Funny how everyone I know with rotary powered cars never seems to have them on the road for more than a month or two at a time, and are getting fuel consumption skywards of 15L/100km. (AFAIK the R32 GT-R is quoted at around 16L/100, and GTS-T at 10L) Thats why I mentioned reliability, and fuel consumption, from my own experiences. The OP asked why they suck (and if they were any good they would be in mainstream use), and apart form epic thread diversions and invasions from RX-7 owners, is being told opinions why.

Rb30s are stronger than local motors - 500 000km on an unopened RB30S FTW
I can't wait to meet another rotary owner and inform them all about the 'mazda lies' which have been uncovered in this thread :D
I think the main problem is your continuing acceptance of the Mazda lies Birds :)
good point about the turbo sizes, all that air has to fit in somewhere! (even with the rotary's lower inherent compression ratio).

After reading this thread, I can't look at an RX-7 the same way because I'm constantly thinking theres a 3.9 litre motor in there, and my boner goes down just that little bit more :P

I think we're all forgetting that this is a thread about why rotaries suck, rather than an existential discussion about what "is" a 2 stroke a 4 stroke or a rotary engine etc etc. Nor is it an RX-7 appreciation thread. Therefore anyone who wasn't bashing Mazda's or rotaries in general is wrong, and should gtfo :D
so the other main reason why rotaries suck is their relative inefficiency compared to modern piston engines?
well now we all agree that the RX-7 sucks due to the Mazda lies since it is a 3.9l rotary cycle motor with characteristics of both 2 and 4 stroke piston engines!
This thread is starting to die off a bit, so before someone takes it and collates it into their university thesis, is the wrong side willing to concede to the Mazda lies?

I cannot be stuffed anymore, but I think this one sums your contribution to this thread perfectly,

What you call fact I say subjective opinion...the length of this thread is evidence of that. But really, shut up man. The debate finished a long time ago...we all got sick of it, even the most argumentative of us. You had your chance for input back then, of which I didn't see much besides you saying who is right and who is wrong. Why try to reignite the fire when the thread is long enough as is? It sure sounds like trolling to me.

um I think you have the wrong quote there, my name isn't marc, and I haven't tried to argue anything with SK? I appreciate the trouble you went to to quote nearly every post I've made in this thread, you must get bored!

If you don't like it, hit report and continue on your way.

most of the posts in this thread are opinion based, does that make them all trolls?

A mate got a Series 5 FC a few months ago, and it's completely stock, it actually has decent fuel consumption and hasn't had any problems yet, though it's been looked after by its Aussie owners well.

so you don't even remember what you've posted in this thread?

people shouldn't have to hit the report button, how come you just couldn't stfu and keep your school yard comments to yourself?

most of these what you say 'opinion based' comments actually come from people that have some kind of first hand experience with the rotary engine and not what they heard from an uncles mates brother who has a cousins sisters boyfriend that owned one.

i just don't get it one bit. but i am sure you will make up another bull shit comment in an attempt to justify your reasoning.

thanks for the laugh though, you really are dumb :P

IMO rotaries suck pure and simply because they are impractical as a street car or a daily in any form. That and the insane fuel consumption.

Funny how everyone I know with rotary powered cars never seems to have them on the road for more than a month or two at a time, and are getting fuel consumption skywards of 15L/100km. (AFAIK the R32 GT-R is quoted at around 16L/100, and GTS-T at 10L) Thats why I mentioned reliability, and fuel consumption, from my own experiences. The OP asked why they suck (and if they were any good they would be in mainstream use), and apart form epic thread diversions and invasions from RX-7 owners, is being told opinions why.

Care to elaborate on why they dont make a perfectly good daily driver? as i beg to differ

Being the owner of 4 rotaries so far i can tell you that my old R100, a 13BT that ran mid 12 all day long, was driven a good 30klms in peak hour traffic on a daily basis and was never an issue. I drove it to work for a good 18 months and it was trouble free.

No personal attack on your mates but clearly they need to find a decent mechanic as the ones they are using sound pretty useless. Reliablity is not an issue if they are put together properly and BLOJOE is a perfect example of this. A car that if set up properly ie slicks, rollcage etc would run high 8's and it cops it every time the car gets started up. Joe has raped this car and it always comes back for more. I have also seen an FD with its original engine and 250,000klms....

If people wanna pick on engine parts ie seals, lets not go near the RB26 oil pump lol

i think you should remember that this is a public discussion forum, not the Forced Induction section that is more aimed at factual and objective posts. I do like how you've posted about 1 comment that was actually OT and have continually tried to attack me.

As they say, "haters gonna hate"

thanks for dropping docs you top bloke, feel better now? I think it tells a lot about you that you would go to THAT much trouble.

this is a through and through case of trolls trolling trolls like I said

Edited by bozodos
  • 11 months later...

so some good stuff on here.....and the usual E-peen comparison rubbish. i feel like im in a PS3 Vs Xbox thread all over again.

Rotors are great at what they do, and if they were bad they wouldn't have kept them alive so long. i know a 13B will be the engine of choice for my silly little VW bug......even in standard untouched form, a hell of alot faster than any beetle motor for the money....and other than a sardine canned WRX engine..the only thing that fits

That hyper car on this forum, that's what I was originally talking about in very first post on this stupidly long thread.

http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/worlds-greatest-hypercar-hoax-20110829-1jhw3.html

The RSC website states the car will be powered by a 5.2-litre, quad-turbocharged, eight-rotor rotary engine producing 2089kW of power and 3494Nm of torque – or roughly five times the power and torque of a 911 Turbo S.

Rotors are great at what they do.

Amen to that. They are brilliant at turning petrol into noise. The old ones also turn some of the oil dumped through them into noise and stinky fumes aswell. Bonus.

As for the rest of this thread it was stuffed when SK posted a bunch of half arguable "facts". But then people should never let the facts get in the way of a good internet trolling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...