Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if found the 595rs to be a semi semi (ie not as soft as r888 or 555 etc) so you should be ok, ive dynoed a few with the 595rs without drama, mind you they were only high 200 rwkw cars.

Those and the KU36 are a street compound in a semi pattern not an R compound(Like the RE55), or an I mistaken?

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if found the 595rs to be a semi semi (ie not as soft as r888 or 555 etc) so you should be ok, ive dynoed a few with the 595rs without drama, mind you they were only high 200 rwkw cars.

these were the tyres I was using. well actually 595rs-r's

it should be somewhere around 350+kw at the rears which is the bit that concerns me (RB30 + GT3582 0.82)

Those and the KU36 are a street compound in a semi pattern not an R compound(Like the RE55), or an I mistaken?

They have a tread wear rating around 150 unlike the RE55's which are between 50-100 from memory

yep the KU36 and 595rs-r and RT615 are all in the same basket... pretty aggro tread pattern but no where near as soft as full semis... all around 180-200 tread wear rating

I've just had a set of the KU36 put on my car... I wouldn't think they will affect the dyno at all... they drive pretty much like normal road tyres just have a stiffer sidewall, fatter shoulder and bigger tread blocks

I dunno what's up with your car but I would be looking for a second opinion

480rwkw... yes!

480rwhp... no!

unless it was stripped to a bare shell and even then it would probably be too heavy

Defiantly 480rwhp and full body totally as driven and as it sits at my house for sale right now. So many shops give dodgy power figures and people have become so brainwashed that they believe these silly figures. Many high powered GTRs are Dyno queens with very poor power curves with late boost and falling off boost between gears etc.

This thing even does over 500ks to a tank and is very nice to drive with a simple smart package that now its sorted works.

Defiantly 480rwhp and full body totally as driven and as it sits at my house for sale right now. So many shops give dodgy power figures and people have become so brainwashed that they believe these silly figures. Many high powered GTRs are Dyno queens with very poor power curves with late boost and falling off boost between gears etc.

This thing even does over 500ks to a tank and is very nice to drive with a simple smart package that now its sorted works.

sold haha.

I had mine tuned ages ago and at the time it only had 250ish kw, but it was strapped down with NUMEROUS straps. Anyone who has been to the PITS knows the top notch setup matty has going on there.

Pluss I would think that it would have to be strapped down WELL due to OH&S requirements. I dont care who you are, not strapping a car down, or just using 1 strap is completely negligent.

Edited by r33cruiser

Well I have the Time cards and I tuned it myself. Ive been accused of over rating Power graphs but under rating is a first.

I have racecars at every meeting at Wanneroo beating similar cars that claim sometimes 100s of HP more than my cars so these huge power claims make me laugh.

Ive even seen GTRs with 800rwhp power graphs run 11.9s etc so forget Dyno sheets and rely on time cards.

Edited by N I B
i said you could run 134mph with 480rwkw... doesnt mean it would be a good run!

480rwhp on the other hand is bending physics

No it's not... Head out to WSID...

Maybe a car making 480RWHP at 9000RPM it is...

But if it's pushing 480RWHP at 4500RPM... You're making double the torque... IE, it'll accelerate twice as fast... :(

Edit: As to that video of the car "climbing" out of the dyno... I wouldn't even call that movement if you'd seen how mine used to walk around when coming on boost until we worked out how to strap it on perfectly...

Car used to walk 1.5Ft sideways, and if it didn't go sideways, it'd climb OVER the front of the roller and nearly touch the front of the dyno... Oh, and the whole time it's doing this it's filling the work shop with tyre smoke... :cool:

Took us a bit to work it out, but lower the ramp rate, and we actually LOOSENED one of the straps to stop it wheel spinning so much... Still shredded the tyres though in the end... And they were just normal streets!

No it's not... Head out to WSID...

Maybe a car making 480RWHP at 9000RPM it is...

But if it's pushing 480RWHP at 4500RPM... You're making double the torque... IE, it'll accelerate twice as fast... :P

You developing double the torque in order to make the power at that speed but will you accelerate twice as fast?

Edited by DCIEVE

ive only dyno'd a few cars... but in my experience, when i strap them down (using dyno dynamics dyno) that this will not stop them from jumping off the dyno.. the front wheels being choc'd will more then likely .. the strapping down with snatch straps via the lower control arms to the traction bar only achieves better downforce on the rollers for more accurate figures and hopefully preventing wheelspin..

i get alot of people who get scared of thier cars jumping off the dyno and hitting the brick wall 8m infront of the dyno haha... does no one understand the theory of momentum ... a car has none when on the dyno... its not going far if it jumps off, especially when choc'd and the operator backing off.

Edited by Ruffels
Never claimed outrageous power numbers and nothing like I see posted these days. I did once claim very high 400rwkw from a Skyline and it did run well over 140mph over the 1/4 in full street trim to back it up.

what am i doing wrong?...ive got a r32 running around 145 MPH weighing 1571kg...its got over 600kw at the treads.

In 2004 ND4SPD was 500rwkw(683rwhp) on My Dyno and ran over 140mph on normal road Dunlops. ET was quite poor at high 10s but Speed proves the power.

I think people like having unrealistic power figures on their cars and are happy to believe they do even if they cant run the MPH they should.

http://www.dragsource.com/index.php?navsel...mp;calctoview=4

checks out here...

3457lb

best et 9.45

best MPH 145

best dyno figure 820hp

the result is only 2.5hp off

its made between 810 and 820 on two different dyno's in two different cities with a very skilled dyno operator.

NIB the car you are refering to is a freak (not ND4SPD the other one)...actually something has come to mind...what final drive is it using? ND4SPD's MPH is about right for the power as i ran 139.6 holding 3rd with 500KW at the treads.

Fatz the 145MPH was using 4 gears...hehe

Edited by DiRTgarage

Engine HP maybe not rear wheel. The figures used for these Power/weight v Speed calculators are all based on USA Superflow type dynos.

The car I was talking about backed up its power within 2rwhp at a big car show. 500rwkw is just short of 800 at the flywheel and returned 143 and a bit MPH.

Big George Toyota is around 1440kg and ran 150 and low 9s with 600rwhp, Glen Robinsons Ford is 1275KGs and ran 8.8@ 152mph with 820 flywheel on a Superflow engine dyno.

Engine HP maybe not rear wheel. The figures used for these Power/weight v Speed calculators are all based on USA Superflow type dynos.

The car I was talking about backed up its power within 2rwhp at a big car show. 500rwkw is just short of 800 at the flywheel and returned 143 and a bit MPH.

Big George Toyota is around 1440kg and ran 150 and low 9s with 600rwhp, Glen Robinsons Ford is 1275KGs and ran 8.8@ 152mph with 820 flywheel on a Superflow engine dyno.

they refer in the text below the calculator to being within 2hp of a dynojet dyno...i.e. a chassis dyno

http://www.dynojet.com/automotive_dyno/default.aspx

what am i doing wrong?...ive got a r32 running around 145 MPH weighing 1571kg...its got over 600kw at the treads.

Thats with you in the car and the fuel cell filled right? I thought a stripped R32 drag GTR would weigh less than that... I suppose the roll cage adds a bit of weight back?

I've weighed mine with me in the car and fuel (can't remember exactly how much fuel there was, probably half a tank) and it was 1500kg on the dot. Mates aero top supra was 1620kg with him and fuel in it for reference.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...