Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well obviously im wondering how much of a difference in handling the front strut bar makes

ive lowered my car and taken out the entire a/c system and shifted the batter to the rear of the car and already it handles about a thousand times better

i almost got one put on the car when i lowered it, but the shop that installed my new shocks and lowered the car reckoned that because of the suspension design on the front of skylines, a strut bar doesnt make much difference, but obviously it must make a difference if a gtr gets one.... right?

what do you guys/girls think?

thanks!

Edited by AYW550

Find a new suspension shop. Strut bar is, IMO, a great benefit. Tying the strut tops together helps to stiffen the car up and stops a lot of body flex whic saps performance through the twisty stuff. Just go and get one you know you want to.

I agree with rb ryan!

the top of the strut/shock takes sfa force in a double wishbone setup like skyline compared to say a silvia with strut front suspension. the force is on the inner end of the upper and lower control arm which are not really braced by a strut brace.

btw also gtrs did not come with a strut bar, except n1.

btw also gtrs did not come with a strut bar, except n1.

Really? I thought they did. Mine does and I only wish it were an N1 (although no rear wiper like an N1). Pretty much every GTR I've ever seen has them.

An the extra bracing on the GTR is amazing - there are "extra" bits all over under the car.

yeah seems like a split descision really, id want one for looks just as much as for handling benefits, (but doesnt seem like there are many) any one driven their car before and after a strut brace?

also, how much do they get in the way of working on your car? like in the way of the intake and stuff, would be a pain to tkae it off and on whenever i was under the hood

Edited by AYW550

not sure about the technical suspension setups, but having installed a cusco front brace on my s2 33 just on the weekend, i can tell you GET ONE!!!

I only have shocks, not coilovers - and ive heard that with coilovers the difference is minimal but shocks is definitely recommended.

the difference is actually amazing. Maybe its just my driving style or the way the car is set up but i find now the steering feels much lighter, and the front grip has increased dramatically. For $150 - 200 for a decent one i would not think twice - my opinion now is that they are quite underrated.

As for working on the engine, it seems they are easy to remove (4 nuts) so personally i wouldn't worry about it too much.

Hope that helps :)

One of the first changes I made to my 33 and noticed the difference straight away. Car was more responsive on turn in at normal road speeds let alone track. Get one and you will see.

Edited by skylinecouple
I agree with rb ryan!

the top of the strut/shock takes sfa force in a double wishbone setup like skyline compared to say a silvia with strut front suspension. the force is on the inner end of the upper and lower control arm which are not really braced by a strut brace.

btw also gtrs did not come with a strut bar, except n1.

My R34 sedan got a stock strut brace...

And there are alot of R34s out there that has it stock. :)

I too noticed a tighter and more direct front end.

She is a little bulky with the front diff and half shafts etc though.

The only thing a rear one did was add a little weight to the car.

  • 2 weeks later...

Another benefit you will hopefully not have to find out, is that it does supply extra body rigidity in in an accident..my friend found out the hard way..but was told the car would have been alot worse off had the brace not been there after he put his the front corner of his car into a wall

My car has coilovers and front and rear strut braces and it feels mega tight more like a smaller more nimble car thru the corners,

on saying that i aint drove a std skyline without one, so cant really compare but if mine is anything to go buy they go nice and tight :D

Another benefit you will hopefully not have to find out, is that it does supply extra body rigidity in in an accident..my friend found out the hard way..but was told the car would have been alot worse off had the brace not been there after he put his the front corner of his car into a wall

Do you want more rigidity at the front though?

What you want in a crash is for the driver compartment to stay intact but for everything else to deform/yield and absorb the energy. i.e crumble zones etc. That way the rate of deceleration on the driver/passengers is less.

If you're adding rigidity/strength to the front it's the opposite effect surely?

Tony i think what doozooby was referring to may have been a side impact crash...

i agree with you that a head on crash increasing the rigity may not necesarilly be a good thing, but then again i suppose its not front-back rigidity, its side to side...but im no crash tester expert lol.

Either way i think the question has been answered - handling is improved :D

Do you want more rigidity at the front though?

What you want in a crash is for the driver compartment to stay intact but for everything else to deform/yield and absorb the energy. i.e crumble zones etc. That way the rate of deceleration on the driver/passengers is less.

If you're adding rigidity/strength to the front it's the opposite effect surely?

front = decent amount

rear = not a lot

the strut brace holds not too far away from the upper link at the front, stopping this sideways distortion helps a lot, especially mid corner understeer.

rear does f**k all as all ur links are connected to the subframe, which ur strut brace is no where near. u can add bracing to the subframe, which is the equivilent of a strut brace on the front, but ur talking about nowhere near the amount of flex.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...