Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When you go over a bump and the G's force your foot down further on the throttle, the car speeds up/lurches, foot comes up, then down in this horrible lurchy/jerky acceleration/deceleration of repeat, repeat, until to lift your foot off. Some sort of positive feedback or something going on?

I'm finding this happens more now I've stiffened up my suspension and put stiffer sway bars on.

It tends to happen at certain intersections in 1st or 2nd gear.

Kind of embarrassing.

Anything I can do?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/294013-what-do-you-call-it-when/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Lol how fast are you going over said bumps? Because if you are going fast enough for the G-forces to push your foot down, i really wouldn't be worried about the embarrassment of lurching lol...

Lol how fast are you going over said bumps? Because if you are going fast enough for the G-forces to push your foot down, i really wouldn't be worried about the embarrassment of lurching lol...

Hmm not that fast, but I've been driving a bit more 'uninhibited' now I've got some mild mods.

I've had my foot totally on the floor a few times lately just to test the car out. :( Within the speed limit of course and with no loss of traction. :rofl:

I don't think he means speed bump, just any bump... I can't say i have experienced this though lol. Maybe i have, but i wouldn't describe it the same way as you haha. Don't really understand

Yeah not speed bumps as such, I don't go over them fast. I mean just the bumpy/poor surfaces of intersections etc.

We've got some real cr@p roads here in Perth that is for sure.

Yeah taking your foot off the gas until the car settles seems to work, but this seems to mean that with some traffic lights/intersections you just can't do a 'hero' type launch....er hypothetically that is. :( I guess that is the prices of stiff suspension for good cornering?

hehe, i know wat you mean, my aristo has fairly stiff suspension and this happens to me wen i drive over bumps n stuff, i have found letting off the gas until the car settles is your best bet!!

You just answered your own comment there, your aristo (read barge) is so bloody heavy it NEEDS stiff suspension to eliminate all the commodore like bodyroll.

As for the lurching, what sort of clutch do you have? How much play do you have with your release point etc? Might just want to give it a few move revs before you engage the clutch. Your suspension doesn't have anything to do with how you're using the clutch :(

Fair dinkum guys, he's not talking about jerky clutch take offs.

He's talking about going over a bump and that bump translates into his foot moving slightly on the throttle.

Rysies, why would you clutch in when rolling through an intersection? if anything you'd just lift off the gas or just raise your heel off the floor.. that's what I do, especially over railway tracks.

Hmmm i think i get it, seem to remember this happening when i was first on my L's... No offense intended with that lol. Just that in my first car i learned to do what these guys are saying, balance your foot on the accelerator and make sure your heel isn't on the floor.

In the Skyline it doesn't happen to me anymore because i make sure to not go over said bumps lol, ive replaced one rim already from Perth's sweet road surfaces, making sure it doesn't happen again

He's not talking about speed bumps, he's talking about shitty roads with holes and bumps. Don't worry mate, it is a normal by-product of stiff suspension. All your controls become extra sensitive as a result. Bumps make you lose traction very easily too. As for taking off from the lights, you can either:

A. Wedge your foot against the kick panel so that it is less likely to move when going over bumps

B. Lift off throttle and just coast in gear or use a bit of clutch over the shitty parts of the road to turn power on/off. Or if in a drag race...

C. Foot flat to the floor and let an LSD take the blame.

With my coilovers I don't bother with traffic light heroism on shitty roads, particularly uphill...you'll just get messed up in 1st gear.

I've read this thread a few times for shits and giggles - the guy can't drive his car.

I've got stiff suspension, a monster clutch and the roads around here are f**ked, maybe I'm just used to it but I have no drama's, my driveway is even worse and I can reverse up that without spitting gravel. I didnt get my license from the bottom of a Fruit Loops box..so I dunno.

I've read this thread a few times for shits and giggles - the guy can't drive his car.

I've got stiff suspension, a monster clutch and the roads around here are f**ked, maybe I'm just used to it but I have no drama's, my driveway is even worse and I can reverse up that without spitting gravel. I didnt get my license from the bottom of a Fruit Loops box..so I dunno.

You've read it a few times and still didn't know what he was talking about?

How about you shut up now.

Edited by bubba

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...