Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I got the M35 on Tuesday afternoon and have already put almost 300klms on it :D

I have a quick question, does the xanavi version of the navigation system have the economy leaf and so on? I can not seem to find it if it does. I had a look at the guys M35 around the corner (autech axis) and this has the normal Nissan program with the economy leaf.

Thanks in advance.

Cameron

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/294974-xanavi-help-on-m35/
Share on other sites

all nav units are xanavi units?

im pretty sure

it's the 3rd button

then toggle with the stick

do you mean the 3rd button from left to right? and on the top or bottom?

thanks, ill give this a try :D

Hey guys, I tried the above advice but the third button did not do anything, it does not make a noise or anything. Also, from the photos I have seen of other peoples screens, mine is very different, it does not say nissan on it but has 'birdview' with all blue backgrounds and so on. There is only 1 screen that is the 4th button accross from the left on the top with any kind of info on it and it has only got a very basic compass and the rest of the info is these little graphs and so on.

Hey guys, I tried the above advice but the third button did not do anything, it does not make a noise or anything. Also, from the photos I have seen of other peoples screens, mine is very different, it does not say nissan on it but has 'birdview' with all blue backgrounds and so on. There is only 1 screen that is the 4th button accross from the left on the top with any kind of info on it and it has only got a very basic compass and the rest of the info is these little graphs and so on.

Ooops, my error :)

When I jumped in the car last night, I noticed that it IS the 4th button across that you will need to hit.

The leaf is then the top right option.

Sorry about that Cam.

That leaf is pointless!! haha economy and m35.. does not go together

I guess you just have the wrong mods then! My fuel economy is through the roof on a standard tune.

Travelled 136kms last night... mostly freeway (ahem, tollway), but with some main road and residential in there too. Averaged 94kph according to the trip computer and 13.9km/L.

Which works out at 7.2L/100kms. :):):)

Will be putting up a post, with pics regarding this mod very soon.

Edited by iamhe77
I guess you just have the wrong mods then! My fuel economy is through the roof on a standard tune.

Travelled 136kms last night... mostly freeway (ahem, tollway), but with some main road and residential in there too. Averaged 94kph according to the trip computer and 13.9km/L.

Which works out at 7.2L/100kms. :):):)

Will be putting up a post, with pics regarding this mod very soon.

Cam, you ought to put and exhaust gas temperature probe in your exhaust to make sure you do not lean out tooooo much.

I am looking forward to seeing the details of your mod.

Edited by andy65b
Cam, you ought to put and exhaust gas temperature probe in your exhaust to make sure you do not lean out tooooo much.

I am looking forward to seeing the details of your mod.

I will soon enough (I hope).

It is only when cruising that the economy is fantastic. When the engine is under load (accelerating) it actually uses more fuel than normal.

Think of it like a 1.5x (example) modifier... 1.5x fuel use when accelerating. 1.5x less fuel used when cruising.

Oh, and the throttle is a fair it more sensitive as well.

I will soon enough (I hope).

It is only when cruising that the economy is fantastic. When the engine is under load (accelerating) it actually uses more fuel than normal.

Think of it like a 1.5x (example) modifier... 1.5x fuel use when accelerating. 1.5x less fuel used when cruising.

Oh, and the throttle is a fair it more sensitive as well.

...the room goes quiet while we all wait with baited breath to hear about this new mod...

7.2L/100km. Thats DAMN good for any car!!

you serious?!

I realise you have a larger turbo and exhaust, both which will help...but even so, I had both of these (+tuning) on my previous stagea and even then it couldn't crack the 10L/100km mark on the highway.

Best I've seen from the M35 is 9.5L/100km and that was 100% highway, no A/C, constant 100km/h in 5th gear.

...the room goes quiet while we all wait with baited breath to hear about this new mod...

7.2L/100km. Thats DAMN good for any car!!

you serious?!

I realise you have a larger turbo and exhaust, both which will help...but even so, I had both of these (+tuning) on my previous stagea and even then it couldn't crack the 10L/100km mark on the highway.

Best I've seen from the M35 is 9.5L/100km and that was 100% highway, no A/C, constant 100km/h in 5th gear.

Very serious... actually scale that down to "quite serious". I don't like getting "very serious".

I don't have a dump done yet, so I don't know if that will aid or diminish economy.

Didn't have the A/C on, but I did have the climate control on if that makes any difference. (18 in cabin, 13 outside)

far out thats good, i can get 7.5L from the fiat on a bad run tho :(

Fanboy.

Maybe you should give your wife the Stag and just get around in your little Fiat :bunny:

Edited by iamhe77
I will soon enough (I hope).

It is only when cruising that the economy is fantastic. When the engine is under load (accelerating) it actually uses more fuel than normal.

Think of it like a 1.5x (example) modifier... 1.5x fuel use when accelerating. 1.5x less fuel used when cruising.

Oh, and the throttle is a fair it more sensitive as well.

i was getting 700 out of a tank to and from the snow..

so it doesnt sound like its going to help me all that much, whats needed is less fuel everywhere else on the map..

400-500km around town, i do drive rather quickly tho. tho its yet to bother me really

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...