Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Spotted two white GT-R's leaving Wagga and heading for home this arvo, - very f'ing nice, was going the other way in my purple R33, gave you a little wave - not sure if I scored was back or was snobbed!

Hope you had a good day and enjoyed Wagga - just didn't quite make it back home in time damn it!

G'day Stolly:yep saw you wave-just managed to wave back b4 you were gone! Nice ride,BTW. That was me(pearl white 32),Sinista(silver 32) and Tridentt150v(black R33) just leaving when you saw us...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/121/#findComment-1186934
Share on other sites

my mate spotted (and keeps spotting) a marone 32 getting fully sideways (or fishy-ing) turning onto canberra ave near officeworks/fyshwick builders supplies (he works at the latter). he says he's seen him do it a stack of times, usually around the same time of day-ish.

 

thought i'd check to see if its any of you nutcases!!! hehe

 

d

ummmmm it might be me Sorrry :wassup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/121/#findComment-1186981
Share on other sites

they are. i agree. i dont do sideways action anymore my wheels are too big and too expensive so i toned it down a bit. anyway enough of that. also spotted the 4 door silver r34 in jerra god i lve that car

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/121/#findComment-1187035
Share on other sites

Spotted a gunmetal R32(GTR?) thismorning coming off the monaro highway out towards the airport, waved to each other

also spotted parked on Gladstone st a very nice looking 4dr R31. had frameless windows, and text on the side that indicated an RB20DET. looked very flash, i've never seen a frameless windowed R31 before.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/121/#findComment-1187113
Share on other sites

also spotted parked on Gladstone st a very nice looking 4dr R31. had frameless windows, and text on the side that indicated an RB20DET. looked very flash, i've never seen a frameless windowed R31 before.

that's one of the import models

pillarless = classy :cheers:

there's one parked on lonsdale street all the time as well

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/121/#findComment-1187207
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...