Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

spotted - heaps of lines (2x white 33's 3 x32's, a 4 door 34) at stonefest last night.

and god do i feel rough!!!!

d

One of the white R33's was mine, nice to meet you djhatton! Yeah i think im going to feel rough all this week. :D

Big thanks to the bloke with the White R33 that stopped when my car was on the side of the road broken earlier this arvo

No worries. Glad to hear it was only a simple problem. Very nice car by the way :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/227/#findComment-1677654
Share on other sites

Yep me too. It made me smile when I saw the indicators flashing on and off... It was a very good way of making a point! :lol: Ever feel like your being watched :)

I couldnt help have another look though. *Drool*

I hardly drive mine but when i do its where I can see it! I even park it in a spot I can see from my desk when I drive it too work! :lol:

Edited by Stevie
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/227/#findComment-1678367
Share on other sites

I swear i flogged the pants off that car or one similiar at the lights near Canberra Hospital ages back while I was getting my car registered.

It was a good day.........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/227/#findComment-1679170
Share on other sites

Spotted slither in civic this arvo about 5:30, drove past me but i was in the girls car

wasn't me dude i was at home by 5:30 theres a burgendy r33 with a 400r front by and my wheels around tho

spotted johny r31 in fyshwick today

Edited by Slither
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/227/#findComment-1679191
Share on other sites

yea that was me i spotted you as well was gonna wave but you wernt looking. i figured it was you though it sound very N/A :P

Yeah, it was missing the whole 'pshtt' side of things;) It was a little hard to see you as the sun was in my eyes:P Was trying to keep an eye on the road too :lol:

Sweet as cooler but bro.

Dayne

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/227/#findComment-1679218
Share on other sites

cheers :) yours looked like a nice package not over the top suited it also what colour is yours it looked sort like black/grey ???

Yeah, it was missing the whole 'pshtt' side of things;) It was a little hard to see you as the sun was in my eyes:P Was trying to keep an eye on the road too :lol:

Sweet as cooler but bro.

Dayne

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/227/#findComment-1679392
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...