Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My bad i thought it was leshy, when people spell my name right i will spell yours hehe :P

Name's Leshy, get it right... crikey.

That would have been my missus going to work at the hospital, as she's been driving my Stagea around for the past 2 months while Toyota do a really efficient and cost-effective repair job on her Corolla. I'm now cruising around in a crappy red VL commodore, so don't bother trying to spot me :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/391/#findComment-2962920
Share on other sites

Thats me :D

Nice to meet you..on the forums,anyway! Sounds nice,your thing!

Delayed spotted:me hopping out of the tired old Liberty to help a stopped R32 GT-R(in beautiful Bayside Blue)on Dairy Flat Road last Saturday arv'. Whilst he's not on the forums(yet),the young owner is a nice guy,so if you see this car,make sure you give him a wave!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/391/#findComment-2967537
Share on other sites

Is that the one with the plates RB026 or similar ???

Nice to meet you..on the forums,anyway! Sounds nice,your thing!

Delayed spotted:me hopping out of the tired old Liberty to help a stopped R32 GT-R(in beautiful Bayside Blue)on Dairy Flat Road last Saturday arv'. Whilst he's not on the forums(yet),the young owner is a nice guy,so if you see this car,make sure you give him a wave!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/391/#findComment-2968124
Share on other sites

Is that the one with the plates RB026 or similar ???

Can't remember the plates,but do remember that it was at F & F Imports for sale for a little while. Basically a stocker with nice rims and a choice colour applied...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/391/#findComment-2968140
Share on other sites

Is that the one with the plates RB026 or similar ???

Now I know why the plates were familiar;Veilside just jogged my memory! Dave's 32 (RB026) was 'Calsonic Blue',the one I stopped for was "Bayside Blue"- two different model colours and eras,but excellent nonetheless!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/391/#findComment-2968194
Share on other sites

Also i finished work at like 12:30 driving back to my hotel room and what do i see bucket loads of imports on the main drag here in Christchurch i mean heaps. Side of the roads littered with them. So i pull over to watch and see what sort of cars are around (may as well nothing else to do) and some kiwi comes up and starts chatting to me for like 20 minutes he was a champ he was there with a guy in a nice clean RX7 and R34 GT-T. Anyways at the 20 minute mark a cop siren sounds and i wish i had my camera everyone jumps in there cars and flys off up to road GOLD...

Anyways spotted mainly

WRX

Legacy Wagons

RX7

Evo's

R32 GTS-T (although most of these were pretty crappy condition big dint's,scratches, rust etc)

R32 GTR

R33 GTS-T

R34 GT-T

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/391/#findComment-2969198
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...