Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I can't believe you're posting on SAU only a few days after the new WoW thing came out. :(

I know!

Got Level 75 on Sunday afternoon though :banana:

To be honest, i came back cause i blew my Turbo on Thursday and was poking around to see what was what

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/519/#findComment-4266209
Share on other sites

gungrey wingless r32 just drove past my window at work (ie up joynton smith drive past between immigration and the belconnen mall) must be kind of loud because i heard it over my music (headphones) and through the window.. the car looked mostly stock apart from the wingless rear end. i didnt get a long enough look (and only from the back) at it to decide if it was a GT/R or not

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/519/#findComment-4267471
Share on other sites

spotted Shell this arvo heading into fyshwick turning on to Canberra Ave. hope i didn't chop you too bad when i merged! i was driving the white subie, which is why it probably looked really strange seeing some idiot waving at you in a totally different car!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/519/#findComment-4273264
Share on other sites

haha so it was you... I was fairly sure... yeh I did wonder who it was at first with just the arm, but then the head came out the window as well haha :D

No the merging was fine, I always leave a bit of space and let people in at that spot... cos I'm a considerate driver like that lulz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/519/#findComment-4274531
Share on other sites

Spotted an unmarked black VE SS ute stalking the dara formal last night ..massive cheers the random who knocked on the window and warned us

r33skylinegtst - I've seen a couple of new model lancers as unmarked cars lately, hubcaps and all haha

and followed a mint white 32GTR with gold Volks through fadden and lower chisho yesterday

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/519/#findComment-4277609
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...