Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Rob, not trying to be a smartarse but even if these caps look similar to your ones can you stop someone else producing a 'similar' product ?

Or are your caps and design patented ?

You have a point....look at every H-beam conrod for RB's they are nearly all identical and made from 4340

Rob, not trying to be a smartarse but even if these caps look similar to your ones can you stop someone else producing a 'similar' product ?

Or are your caps and design patented ?

Its a moral issue as much as anything, the caps look identicle to me and everyone knows I desiged this system years ago.

We'll see what Spools attitude is to the situation and go from there,

Rob

WOW, you have balls posting pictures of something you have clearly just copied from me!!

Maybe its OK in China to copy anything and have no shame or morals about it but I sure didn't expect it from you.

Stop any production or use of those mains caps immediately and I hope you have a good lawyer and best you get him to get in touch with me smartly.

Rob

Hey RIPS just wondering if your design is patented. Seems as though there is not exactly a 100 different ways to produce a cap/girdle set up and just seems a bit rich to suggest that because you produced one first no one else can produce one.

As looking at both set ups it is pretty much a no brainer that both would be the most straight forward and logical way to manufacture the product. And not to take anything away from either of you guys for the efforts you put in but mate it is not exactly rocket science for any compatent machinest to produce one of these girdles. Just seems like the response from you is a bit of an overreaction on your part. But then again if you have gone to the trouble of registering your design with an international patent then that could be a different story but even if that is the case it would seem that a 10% veriation on the desighn would not be to difficult for spool to achieve if it is not already 10% different is quite difficult to tell from the pics posted. This is in no way meant to be having a dig at you just my personal take on what I have read.

Its a moral issue as much as anything, the caps look identicle to me and everyone knows I desiged this system years ago.

We'll see what Spools attitude is to the situation and go from there,

Rob

i don't want this to come across rude and im definately not taing sides but if it isn't patented you have a hard road ahead... funny thing is it may actually help you sell more in the long run.. spools version will sell to the same market as the rest of their gear. It is generally accepted as off the shelf china sourced product and they have priced it accordingly, yours on the other hand will still be the premium product and there are always customers after the branded premium item. The more widely known the concept is, generally the more sales be it low end or high end, the key is pricing yours as the easy upsell.

Sure it may be conceived as morally wrong but unfortunately that is business regardless of product type or industry. If the original manufacturer does not keep their pricing structure relevant then it opens up a market gap that is easily filled and SPOOL, NITTO etc are doing that with their whole range, who can blame them? they didn't open the gap... they only filled it before someone else.

agreed, with the above. lots of people think of similar ways around a problem, so it is products are going to look similar from time to time. Did RIPS sell one of their kits to Spool?

assumption is the mother of all f*ckups. no disrespect to either of Rob or Brad - both create great products, but even if it is the same as your Rob, what do you have to ensure only RIPS produces this kind of work?

Edited by DAN00H
Hey RIPS just wondering if your design is patented. Seems as though there is not exactly a 100 different ways to produce a cap/girdle set up and just seems a bit rich to suggest that because you produced one first no one else can produce one.

As looking at both set ups it is pretty much a no brainer that both would be the most straight forward and logical way to manufacture the product. And not to take anything away from either of you guys for the efforts you put in but mate it is not exactly rocket science for any compatent machinest to produce one of these girdles. Just seems like the response from you is a bit of an overreaction on your part. But then again if you have gone to the trouble of registering your design with an international patent then that could be a different story but even if that is the case it would seem that a 10% veriation on the desighn would not be to difficult for spool to achieve if it is not already 10% different is quite difficult to tell from the pics posted. This is in no way meant to be having a dig at you just my personal take on what I have read.

Well its not actually a no brainer to come up with the way I've done it and there's more than 1 other guy who'd designed and made caps a totally different way as it appeared to them that their idea would be best, it wasn't untill he'd had trouble with it that there was a discussion on here.

Once someone see's a finished product that has had a lot of time and money invested in it, its very easy to sit there and say, "Oh thats simple as, anyone could have come up with that and any compatent machinist could make those" that doesn't make it right to just blatently copy what someone else has spent alot of time working on.

Like I say, maybe it is more of a moral issue and we'll see what Spool has to say about it, if he doesn't give a flying f&*k and he's happy to just copy anyone's products and not give it a second thought, then we'll all know where we stand and go from there.

Rob

  • Like 1
if he doesn't give a flying f&*k and he's happy to just copy anyone's products

It could be worse, you could have an established product that someone not only has copied (and I mean 100% visual clone) but passes them off as *your* kits (doing damage by offering a substandard and faulty product) and costs you so far $120K in lost earnings over the past 2 years....but hey that's my story :(

It's times like this you need to adapt and roll with it. I do agree 1000% with Trent on this, it's all to do with market share and how it's divided, how often do we see this with Chinese turbos flooding the market. Garrett don't give a rats.

It could be worse, you could have an established product that someone not only has copied (and I mean 100% visual clone) but passes them off as *your* kits (doing damage by offering a substandard and faulty product) and costs you so far $120K in lost earnings over the past 2 years....but hey that's my story :(

It's times like this you need to adapt and roll with it. I do agree 1000% with Trent on this, it's all to do with market share and how it's divided, how often do we see this with Chinese turbos flooding the market. Garrett don't give a rats.

Actually, I will stay out of this. Rob is probably very upset as he put a lot of effort/money into his desgin.

I still think Spool isnt in the wrong.

Edited by cactus

beat everyone else to it and take your idea to China to implement :(

really - at the end of the day, its called competition. And remember, immitation is the sincerest form of flatery...

hang on... does RIPS actually do a 95mm stroker 3.4??? remember this girdle was created to accomodate said stroker, could just be lucky coincidence that it LOOKS like Robs...

Im curious now steve?

I think if Spool's Mains setup is a blatent copy (100%) than I can see why RIPS would want to persue legal action, but if it is slighty different than there is no point....A bit of competition in the market is a good thing for us as it helps stop way over inflated pricing.

I think the reason the china copy industry boomed is because people dont want to pay $20,000 bucks for a step 3 HKS stroker kit when it wouldnt cost half that to manufature.

So having more and more options especially quality gear from the likes of RIPS is going to be a good thing.

i think you will find the exclusivity clause on the some of above products from the ROC factory that was producing the kits for the original company is now over, i can tell you now the kits i was going to bring in come from the same factory as a huge US based stroker company just unbranded. Many factories wil subsidise the developement stage by offering a set exclusivity period after which the product become free to market just without the branding. Another scenario is qty, if the company fails to move sufficient quantity or a pre agreed qty then they are able to sell to anyone. If you paid the full tooling and development cost then yes it is wholly and solely exclusive.

As for your product it would be plain stupid not to produce it overseas for a fraction of the cost... higher margin for you, lower cost to consumer but more importantly it gives you room to keep the sell price relevant after the product plateaus. If your worried about quality then its moot as the factories i have seen have newer equipment and harder working staff than most local outfits.... sad truth.

Again this isnt aimed @ Spool or Rips as i dont know either of them its just my personal experience in these kind of matters.

2JZ; bore 86mm stroke 86mm

RB30;bore 86mm stroke 86mm

as for one company having no gain in copying another companies kit (regardless of who either of them are), the one who copies simply copies the final product. No r and d. No money and time spent on kits that didn't work or failed. If you've developed something yourself, you would know this :(

... I am not talking about companies copying designs for the same component, I am talking about your comparison between Spool's NISSAN RB30 stroker and the HKS TOYOTA 2JZ stroker. He cannot copy this design. It has nothing to do with developing something myself and understanding R+D.

... I am not talking about companies copying designs for the same component, I am talking about your comparison between Spool's NISSAN RB30 stroker and the HKS TOYOTA 2JZ stroker. He cannot copy this design. It has nothing to do with developing something myself and understanding R+D.

I won't go into big details here, but think of it as changing blocks. Then using rb journals instead of 2J.

Anyway I'm staying out of this thread now, this is between rips and spool

I know of another design about to come to market that incorporates the adapter with re-designed main caps and a stronger girdle. of course it looks similar to the designs posted already but is different in a few key areas and I know for a fact the guy making it has designed it himself. it's not un-usual for people to come to a similar conclusion to the same problem.

I also recently saw the one out of one of the first ever RB26/30's made. this RB26/30 was made at least 10 years ago (memory a bit hazy). it belonged to joe at SSS here in sydney and would be close to one of the first 26/30s made in the world especially in a 4WD application. it was hand made (not machined billet) and a fair bit different to the above designs but you can see where it was going.

anyway, I have no idea whether spool copied rips design or whether they did their own R+D and just came to the same solution. regardless of that without some patents in force it will be hard to legally stop them.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...