Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Though I drive sensibly nowadays, the dumbest shit I have ever done while driving would have to be when I was on my red p's driving my 1986 1.6L corolla hatchback, it would either be

a) high speed offroading at my mates farm on the race track we made, including jumps at about 90kmph (yes I did get a bit airborne)

b) seeing 200kmph on the speedo with a bit of a tail wind

I think that most young drivers will inevitably do something reckless in their car no matter what they drive, yet we are taught nothing about what to do in emergency situations nor anything about a cars handling characteristics. Its pretty much assumed by the idealistic system currently in place that: no normal person would ever even think to speed; if you do not speed you will never be in an emergency situation. ever; if you happen to speed even 5kms over the limit your car suddenly becomes a lethal killing machine and it is a miracle if you do not kill yourself and everyone around you.

^^^ all the more reason why motoring associations and governments should advocate advanced driver training and NOT sit on their hands.

an advanced driver training course 1>2>3 isn't just about gear changes, taking the best line, knowing where your wheels are, braking, overtaking, corner speed, sliding/braking on a wet surface, slaloms yaddayadda...

it's also about driving according to what your car can do, maturity evolving from experience, consequences, thinking and processing etc etc

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Errr I think the ideas some of you are coming up with are just stupid - it's not the car, it's the driver. The changes some of you guys are talking about are unrealistic and simply not going to happen. The regulators would have to physically modify every car on the road to make it reasonable and fair to all.

Of course it's the driver, without a car he can't kill himself or other people, but would the story have been different if they were driving a Ford Focus? (don't say RS).

I can understand where birds is coming from too, Singapore is one of the world's strictest country, you can't even bring chewing gum into the country, but it works, and you know what they don't miss it either lol I have seen a number off JDM cars there too, bunch of ballers I hate them all.

Anyway they were talking about regulators today, would be an incredibly expensive proposition but just remember electric cars are just around the corner, you'll never know.

Once again, making it compulsory for cars to be limited otherwise face a huge fine or something would be cool. Taking cars away is too drastic i reckon, thats akin to a minimum 10 grand fine, kinda harsh don't you think?

They were talking about impounding and crunching cars to a pulp.

i can't believe some of the draconian suggestions some of you are making.

i do love these knee jerk reactions to isolated incidents fueled by unreliable sensationalist media sources such as the Herald Sun and "current affairs" tv shows - Port Arthur anyone?

Fact is people will always die on the roads and no amount of policing or law changing is going to reduce that to zero - there are too many inherent risks associated with driving or riding in a motor vehicle that cannot be completely eliminated (mainly due to the human factor).

This was a terrible tragedy for the victims families......no question....but I do find it hard to feel sorry for the victims themselves. Driver was drunk AND speeding in an urban area filled with road furniture. Passengers willingly got into an unregistered car with a drunk driver and not every passenger had a seatbelt. Any way you look at it this accident was waiting to happen.

Can only hope that a few people learn the lessons from this.

I think that most young drivers will inevitably do something reckless in their car no matter what they drive, yet we are taught nothing about what to do in emergency situations nor anything about a cars handling characteristics. Its pretty much assumed by the idealistic system currently in place that: no normal person would ever even think to speed; if you do not speed you will never be in an emergency situation. ever; if you happen to speed even 5kms over the limit your car suddenly becomes a lethal killing machine and it is a miracle if you do not kill yourself and everyone around you.

Very good description of the reality right there. The last line rings a bell with Ken Lay's rationale when it comes to speeding...making what he did sound like such a bad thing just so he wouldn't have to eat words over his campaign and the traffic laws...because the reality of it is that what he did wasn't actually that bad and is such a common mistake to make by most people. Then I love the idea that residential speed limits once upon a time used to be 60km/h...since been reduced to 50km/h...so can we retro-fine everyone for driving unsafe when the limits were posted at 60km/h? What if 50 is deemed too fast in the future? Then in a way we're all guilty of speeding now, it's just not against the law.

Can't say I know of many articles reporting accident fatality that involved a vehicle travelling at 54km/h in a 50 zone, you'll receive a fine for that one though.

/rant.

Oh yes! I thought I was obeying the speed limit when I was doing 55km/h along Toorak Rd a couple of years ago when the strips of shops were 60 zones. Flash! I did a U turn to see if there was a speed camera that had got me, during which I saw THREE other cars go past a speed camera and get flashed too. Apparently during the week they had installed a couple of 30cm x 30cm 40km/h signs, which me and my 3 passengers had to look quite hard to spot (they were behind trees/bushes). I wanted to challenge it but I was on my last 3 points and going to court would have required me to take the points in the event I lost the case. Surprise surprise, they now have giant LED signs displaying the 40 zone. Some people must have complained about it...

alcohol, surprise surprise. everything jumped on the speed factor, clearly without the alcohol the situation would have been entirely different. Yet it's clear that the message hasn't gotten through to enough people. the passengers must have known he had been drinking and should have refused to let him drive and at the minimum not get in the car. i know i wouldn't.

Edited by Peter89
if you do not speed you will never be in an emergency situation. ever;
Rubbish. I have been involved in 2 "accidents" where I wasn't speeding. First one, some idiot decided to turn left across the service lane of Brighton Rd. I knew I couldn't stop, so I accelerated, got clipped and turned around with a dozen cars bearing down on me. Second one, a bloody great Kenworth came off the Tulla Fwy at Boundary Rd / Flemington Rd while I was travelling to city on Flemington Rd (long time before City Link). Fortunately I caught him out the corner of my eye, swerved right, but he still hit me, picked up the car in the LH lane and deposited me across the tram tracks.
alcohol, surprise surprise. everything jumped on the speed factor, clearly without the alcohol the situation would have been entirely different. Yet it's clear that the message hasn't gotten through to enough people. the passengers must have known he had been drinking and should have refused to let him drive and at the minimum not get in the car. i know i wouldn't.

So in the end we can safely dust this one off as Natural Selection and rest assured that noone innocent was hurt.

I'd really like the news to just report it like that, maybe thats the angle people need to take to reinforce the point that its stupidity causing incidents like this, not the car, not licensing rules, nothing other then good ol stupidity.

Rubbish. I have been involved in 2 "accidents" where I wasn't speeding. First one, some idiot decided to turn left across the service lane of Brighton Rd. I knew I couldn't stop, so I accelerated, got clipped and turned around with a dozen cars bearing down on me. Second one, a bloody great Kenworth came off the Tulla Fwy at Boundary Rd / Flemington Rd while I was travelling to city on Flemington Rd (long time before City Link). Fortunately I caught him out the corner of my eye, swerved right, but he still hit me, picked up the car in the LH lane and deposited me across the tram tracks.

Err..I think the point Crackfox was making is that we have a law that assumes "if you do not speed you will never be in an emergency situation. ever;". In other words you are both in agreement :D

  • 1 year later...

Sorry to revive an old thread but my 2 cents...

What i dont understand is government spends all this money on parks why not spend it on say??........................... A few skip pan *Parks* that are monitered and worked by a few staff that look after the peace of track, Atleast then the entry fee's pays for the maintence and wages of staff you get more work and HEY lookie you get all the frustrated teenage kids come to this little skip pan place pay say 50-100 dollars for an hour to thrash your car around for fun and get it out of you... Personally i think its the governments fault that we dont have enough systems and *areas* where people can let off steam.. And dont get me wrong i dont agree with what people are doing on the roads...>>

Because honestly lets face it an 18 year old is all about blood pumping fun if say they get it drilled into them *If you do it on the road then you can kill yourself or some other human being* Or *You can do it at these little skip pan parks for a small entry fee any time of day and night and then go home no one is hurt* I think i know which one id pick and personally if anyone really picks the first option well to be honest with you im all for having them knee capped and put in a cell because im sick of hearing stuff like this... Ive had my close calls ive seen first hand what a P' plater can do in a 50 zone going around a corner in an OLLLLDDD station wagen while i was on my motorbike on the other line .. can do, i was in the hospitals for days.. Now you tell me if that kid could have had his fun at the skidpan instead of at that street would i have been addmitedd to hospital???

Sid

Edited by SpeedWhore

Drunk and trying to impress his friends in his car= disaster 9 times out of 10. I think learning about driving and the respect for safe driving should start early before they even get to drive a car. The earlier you shape a mind about safe driving the better because leaving it until their teens when they won't listen or think it'll never happen to them is half the problem.

I drove drunk once. About 6 months after getting my P's.

I was at a mates house for a piss up. Might have been a birthday or something. Walked to the maccas across the road (Wantirna Maccas) and they wouldnt server us because they closed up inside and we cant walk through the drive through. So I got in my car and drove since it was about 50 meters. Got food and everything and as I was leaving, didnt take any notice of the fact that Burwood Highway is a divided road (Even though I've lived less than 1km from it my whole life) and i turned onto the wrong side of the road. It took me a few seconds to work out what I'd done and I knew something was wrong. Luckily it was about 3-4am and when I realised what I'd done, the lights had gone green and I could drive back to my mate's place.

Havent driven drunk or after any alcohol since then. Scared the shit out of me. I felt like I was fine when I got in the car. Didnt even hesitate. A good thing that I had a chance to learn my lesson and be scared straight. I think most people just don't realise how easily alcohol can compromise their judgement. I didnt.

In a state of intoxication, you would be surprised how many know the risks/disciplinary action and still do it. When your body is dehydrated by inducing potent diuretics, your brain can quickly change your decision making and judgement. Life sucks because alcohol contributes to many accidents and deaths and innocent people are at the wrong place and time.

I know I shouldnt have done it in the first place. But when you're 18, drinking. trying to impress your mates and possibly because i hadn't been involved in any accidents yet, It's very easy to get carried away. Im not suggesting that everyone should try it once to be scared straight or anything. It's just that I would have considered my group of friends to be the 'sensible group' through school. but I know that at least 50% would have driven after a few drinks on their P's.

Suppose I was just lucky enough to not hurt myself or anyone else

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...