Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cheers fellas. Its been a long road the last 5 months!

Lol yeh I recall you asking a while ago too. I will do that mate. Im also curious to see what its like compared to a stock turbo'd rb25 with the boost screwed up.

The only downside to you getting this wrapped up and tuned, is there's going to be one less 'awsome' build thread to check out...

It would be interesting to see turbo get stuck behind the sc... twin charge!

GL

J.

I think the sprintex 2.8l is good for about 850-900hp.

Im not a fan of the chargers that have casted housing....look shit and are inherently weaker. I am a big fan of the extruded housings like kenne bell, sprintex, autorotor.... Nicer finish, more rigid housing allows for higher boost! :D

Edited by r33_racer
I think the sprintex 2.8l is good for about 850-900hp.

Im not a fan of the chargers that have casted housing....look shit and are inherently weaker. I am a big fan of the extruded housings like kenne bell, sprintex, autorotor.... Nicer finish, more rigid housing allows for higher boost! :D

It would be a very interesting project to see what one of these puppys would do to the driving characteristics of the race car Mik.

The setup as it is on the street car should give a close indication to what it would do on the race car, with the expectation of a bit more power and more punch out of the corners from the 4wd, but i am not sure if it would give a better time around QR. from memory its a power friendly/fast track so the punch out of corners is less of an advantage compared to say wakefield and its slow tight corners where being able to put some power down early helps a lot.

The setup as it is on the street car should give a close indication to what it would do on the race car, with the expectation of a bit more power and more punch out of the corners from the 4wd, but i am not sure if it would give a better time around QR. from memory its a power friendly/fast track so the punch out of corners is less of an advantage compared to say wakefield and its slow tight corners where being able to put some power down early helps a lot.

The race car is rwd as well and we dont live at qr titz, we also have lakeside, Morgan park etc to play with. both the equal of wakie as far as corners go.

Even qr responds to cars that can get the power down early out of the corners. Short of drag racing it is the most beneficial trait any track car can have.

The sprint track at QR would be the one best suited to the low down torque/power. It has some tight corners and its the main gauge for the time attack series here. The national track is the main power friendly course you would be thinking of. Its four drag strips linked with a few corners. If your car can half turn corners and has brutal straight line speed you can pretty much overtake everyone down the straights and hopefully stay ahead during the corners and you can win like that easily and methodically.

Noel, yes it would! Originally I was hoping to do this for the race car......but my father.... However if this turns out to be a top shit setup he would no doubt want to implement it on the race car. Atleast now I know what im doing (sort of) it would be pretty well twice as quick and easy to setup, if not even more so.

Yeh Steven, sorry our race car is virtually identical to my road car....97 S2 gtst. Good ole RWD!

Edited by r33_racer
The sprint track at QR would be the one best suited to the low down torque/power. It has some tight corners and its the main gauge for the time attack series here. The national track is the main power friendly course you would be thinking of. Its four drag strips linked with a few corners. If your car can half turn corners and has brutal straight line speed you can pretty much overtake everyone down the straights and hopefully stay ahead during the corners and you can win like that easily and methodically.

Noel, yes it would! Originally I was hoping to do this for the race car......but my father.... However if this turns out to be a top shit setup he would no doubt want to implement it on the race car. Atleast now I know what im doing (sort of) it would be pretty well twice as quick and easy to setup, if not even more so.

Yeh Steven, sorry our race car is virtually identical to my road car....97 S2 gtst. Good ole RWD!

i was always under the impression the race car was a GTR :D .

Noel, i was trying to get at being able to use the power out of the corners, so the power is there from the get go giving a fairly linear delivery vs the turbo/s where you have to get past the lag before you get the grip testing power surge. most turbo setups i have seen give more torque in the higher revs vs supercharger setups where its bulk midrange grunt, though its a little different now i know their race car is RWD and not 4WD. the improvement i can see from the supercharger there is that it doesnt have as prominant a power surge as the charger is already spun up and just waiting for the throttle/s to be opened, which should act more like a bigger capacity NA helping the RWD keep traction as opposed to a similar HP rated turbo.

i was always under the impression the race car was a GTR :D .

Noel, i was trying to get at being able to use the power out of the corners, so the power is there from the get go giving a fairly linear delivery vs the turbo/s where you have to get past the lag before you get the grip testing power surge. most turbo setups i have seen give more torque in the higher revs vs supercharger setups where its bulk midrange grunt, though its a little different now i know their race car is RWD and not 4WD. the improvement i can see from the supercharger there is that it doesnt have as prominant a power surge as the charger is already spun up and just waiting for the throttle/s to be opened, which should act more like a bigger capacity NA helping the RWD keep traction as opposed to a similar HP rated turbo.

Precisely mate. It will allow for a more gentle power delivery without the rush of turbo tyre shredding surge.

Thanks Ben. I wouldnt say perfectly though. There are some things I could do better now Ive done it. Hopefully whats done will suffice until something happens/goes wrong lol.

Since you guys brought it up ive been thinking about ways to do it to the race car. Ive come up with a few good ideas. Main issue is trying to fit the drive pulley in since the dry sump pump takes up the last of the room out the front of the balancer. But I think it would turn any race car into an animal if it works how it should! I could see a setup like this being perfect for drifters too. Bulk torque on tap instantly.

I have a few pictures from tonight showing a little more. The engine bay is pretty well finished apart from some more tidying of the lines/wires. The damn egt sensors wires are like 3metres long! Its just silly. I need to see if its possible to cut them down and redo the plugs. I want to change the catch can line plumbing too so it sits abit lower and neater.

post-12828-1279286406_thumb.jpg

post-12828-1279286755_thumb.jpg

post-12828-1279287036_thumb.jpg

post-12828-1279288387_thumb.jpg

post-12828-1279288617_thumb.jpg

post-12828-1279288759_thumb.jpg

post-12828-1279288800_thumb.jpg

So tomorrow I will see if my old throttle cable bracket will work with this new throttle body and if so then put the bonnet and front bar back on and go put some petrol in it and take it for a test drive around the block and see what it does or doesn't do! I will take some videos of it too and throw them up for everyone to see :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...